Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Control
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 60 | 66 | 78 | 106 |
| 1440p QHD | 89 | 99 | 113 | 158 |
| 1080p Full HD | 114 | 135 | 152 | 210 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Control on Your System
The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 delivers a consistently playable experience in Control, with average frame rates comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold across every resolution and preset combination tested. The data shows a system that scales predictably, offering high refresh rate performance at 1080p and maintaining solid 4K gameplay even at maximum settings.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, this combo is overwhelmingly fast. The average frame rate at Low settings hits 210.2 FPS, which drops to 152.1 FPS at Medium and 134.6 FPS at High. Even the most demanding Ultra preset produces an average of 113.9 FPS. These numbers indicate that the system is far from being stressed at this resolution; the bottleneck has shifted almost entirely to the CPU, allowing the RTX 5070 to operate well below its full capacity.
Moving to 2560x1440 shows a noticeable but expected decline in performance. The Low preset still delivers an excellent 157.9 FPS average. Medium settings average 112.7 FPS, while High settings produce 98.7 FPS. The Ultra preset remains highly playable with an average of 89.2 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p is roughly linear, with the Ultra preset dropping by about 21.7% (from 113.9 to 89.2 FPS), which is typical for a game that begins to lean more heavily on the GPU at higher resolutions.
At 3840x2160, the system remains fully capable of running the game, though the margins tighten. The Low preset still achieves a strong 106.3 FPS average. Medium settings average 77.6 FPS, and High settings come in at 66.2 FPS. The Ultra preset is the only configuration that approaches the 60 FPS line, averaging exactly 60.2 FPS. This is a marginal pass, but it is a pass nonetheless, meaning that even the most visually demanding settings are technically playable at 4K. The performance gap between Low and Ultra at this resolution is substantial, a 43.4% reduction, highlighting the GPU's growing dominance in determining frame rate.
The absence of min and max FPS data in the results means the analysis relies solely on average frame rates. This is a limitation, as it does not capture potential frame-time spikes or stutters, but the consistent averages across all presets suggest a stable experience. The data indicates that the RTX 5070's 12 GB of GDDR7 memory and 672.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for Control's demands at all tested settings.
CPU and GPU Roles
The division of labor between the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 shifts predictably as resolution increases. At 1920x1080, the CPU's role is more prominent. The 265K, with its 20 cores and 20 threads, is more than capable of feeding the GPU, which is evidenced by the high frame rates that exceed 200 FPS at Low settings. In this scenario, the GPU is not the limiting factor; the system's performance is more likely constrained by the game engine's single-threaded aspects, though the data does not isolate this.
At 2560x1440, the balance begins to tip toward the GPU. The frame rate differences between presets become more pronounced, with Ultra (89.2 FPS) being significantly slower than Low (157.9 FPS). This widening gap suggests that the RTX 5070's rendering load is increasing, and its performance characteristics are becoming the primary driver of the final frame rate. The CPU still has ample headroom, but it is no longer the sole determinant of performance.
The trend culminates at 3840x2160, where the GPU is unequivocally the bottleneck. The difference between Low (106.3 FPS) and Ultra (60.2 FPS) is a massive 46.1 FPS, demonstrating that the RTX 5070 is working near its limit at the highest settings. The CPU's influence is minimal at this resolution; the 265K's job is to simply keep up with the GPU's output, which it does without issue. The data shows that for a player aiming for maximum visual fidelity at 4K, the RTX 5070 is the component that determines the experience, while the CPU is a capable supporting player that does not hold the system back.
FAQ
*Q: Can this PC run Control at 4K with all settings maxed out?*
A: Yes, but just barely. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with the Ultra preset is 60.2 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold by a slim margin. It is technically playable, but there is very little headroom for demanding scenes.
Q: What is the best settings preset for a high refresh rate monitor at 1440p?
A: The data shows that the Ultra preset at 2560x1440 averages 89.2 FPS, which is well above 60 FPS. This makes it the best choice for a 1440p monitor with a refresh rate up to 144Hz, as it provides a fluid experience without sacrificing visual quality.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for this game at 1080p?
A: At 1920x1080, the CPU is the more influential component. The RTX 5070 is capable of producing over 210 FPS at Low settings, indicating that it is not fully utilized. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K's single-core performance, as indicated by its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2020, becomes the limiting factor in achieving even higher frame rates.
Q: How does the performance scale when moving from 1080p to 1440p?
A: The performance drop is significant but not drastic. For the Ultra preset, the average FPS falls from 113.9 at 1080p to 89.2 at 1440p, a decrease of approximately 21.7%. This is a typical scaling pattern, as the GPU's workload increases with the number of pixels rendered.
*Q: Is 12 GB of VRAM enough for Control at 4K Ultra settings?*
A: Based on the measured data, yes. The system achieves a 60.2 FPS average at 3840x2160 with the Ultra preset. While the data does not directly measure VRAM usage, the fact that the game runs at this setting without the frame rate collapsing suggests the 12 GB frame buffer is sufficient for Control's textures and effects.
Q: Does the system maintain a playable frame rate at all resolutions?
A: Yes. According to the verdict data, all four settings presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are marked as playable at every resolution tested, including 3840x2160. The lowest average FPS recorded is 60.2 FPS at 4K Ultra, which still meets the playable threshold.
The Verdict
This PC can unequivocally run Control at every resolution and preset combination tested. The data confirms that all settings at all three resolutions are playable, meaning they average above the 60 FPS threshold. At 1920x1080, the system is overkill, delivering over 200 FPS on Low and 113.9 FPS on Ultra, making it ideal for high refresh rate gaming. At 2560x1440, the experience remains excellent, with the Ultra preset averaging 89.2 FPS, offering a perfect balance of visual quality and smoothness.
The most critical test is at 3840x2160, where the Ultra preset averages 60.2 FPS. This is a pass, but it is a narrow one. Players who want to maintain a rock-solid 60 FPS at 4K with no dips might consider the High preset, which offers an average of 66.2 FPS, providing a more comfortable margin. For those who prioritize frame rate over visual fidelity, the Low preset at 4K yields a very smooth 106.3 FPS. In summary, the combination of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K and RTX 5070 is a versatile pairing that handles Control with ease, from esports-level frame rates at 1080p to a playable 4K experience on the highest settings.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Looking at the nearest rivals for the CPU, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K's performance is closely matched by several other processors. The data shows that the Intel Core i7-14700KF has an average benchmark score that is 1% higher, making it a nearly identical performer for this game. Similarly, the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is just 1.3% behind, suggesting it would deliver a very similar experience in Control. On the higher end, the Intel Xeon 6511P scores 0.2% lower and the Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 is 0.7% lower, all of which are within a negligible performance margin. A system built with any of these CPUs would produce frame rates very close to those measured here.
On the GPU side, the RTX 5070's nearest rivals are not typical gaming cards. The AMD Radeon Pro 580 shows a score that is 0.1% higher, while the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 is 0.8% higher. The AMD Radeon Pro 5300 is 1.2% lower, and the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile is 2% lower. These are professional or mobile workstation parts, but based on their benchmark scores, they would exhibit similar raw performance levels in Control, though their driver optimizations for gaming may differ. For a gaming-focused comparison, these numbers suggest that the RTX 5070's performance tier is well established, and no direct consumer gaming rival within this specific delta range is listed.
How This Combo Ranks
In the broader context of all tested system combinations for Control, this pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 ranks 682nd out of 3720 combinations. This places it in the top 18.3% of all tested systems, which is a strong showing. The high rank reflects the balance between the powerful 20-core CPU and the capable RTX 5070 GPU. While it is not the absolute top-tier configuration, it sits comfortably above the median, indicating that it outperforms the vast majority of other system builds in this game. The combination's ability to achieve playable frame rates at 4K Ultra while also delivering over 200 FPS at 1080p Low demonstrates a wide performance envelope that contributes to its high standing.