Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Control
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 33 | 41 | 43 | 62 |
| 1440p QHD | 51 | 54 | 67 | 87 |
| 1080p Full HD | 67 | 76 | 86 | 120 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Control on Your System
The Intel Core i7-14700KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti pairing produces a system that handles Control well at 1080p and 1440p, but struggles at 4K. The CPU is a top-tier performer, ranking in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU sits in the 59th percentile. This means the RTX 3060 Ti is the primary limiting factor for high-resolution gaming, but the processor's headroom ensures that the GPU is the bottleneck in most scenarios. Benchmark data confirms this is a balanced 1080p/1440p machine for this title, with 4K requiring significant settings compromises.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The nearest rivals for the Intel Core i7-14700KF show that its average benchmark score of 70163 is nearly identical to several other high-end processors. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F scores 69996, a difference of only 0.2%, making it a direct performance equivalent. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX is also close at 69875 (0.4% slower), and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X trails by 0.9% with a score of 69515. On the Intel side, the Core Ultra 7 265K scores 70879, which is 1% higher. For gaming workloads, any of these CPUs would deliver virtually indistinguishable frame rates in Control, as the game is not heavily multi-threaded at these performance levels.
For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, the data shows it is closely matched with several AMD options. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 scores 16014, just 0.7% below the RTX 3060 Ti's 16129 average. The AMD Radeon Pro 5600M and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT are 1.4% faster, scoring 16351 and 16361 respectively. Interestingly, the AMD Radeon R9 370X is only 1.7% slower with a score of 15862, though this is an older architecture. In practice, users with an RX 5700 XT or RX 9060 would see nearly the same FPS in Control as the RTX 3060 Ti, assuming similar driver performance. The RTX 3060 Ti does have a slight edge in ray tracing workloads due to its dedicated RT cores, but for standard rasterization, these alternatives are within the margin of error.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark results clearly show that the GPU dictates performance in Control across all settings and resolutions. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 119.9 FPS, which is the highest frame rate recorded. Dropping to 1080p Ultra reduces performance to 66.6 FPS, a 44% decrease, indicating that the GPU is doing the heavy lifting as settings scale. The CPU's role becomes more apparent when comparing resolutions at the same settings. At 1080p High, the frame rate is 76 FPS, while at 1440p High it falls to 53.7 FPS. This 29% drop is entirely due to the GPU's inability to maintain the same output at a higher pixel count, confirming that the RTX 3060 Ti is the bottleneck even at 1080p High.
The scaling from 1440p to 4K reinforces this conclusion. At 1440p Medium, the system hits 66.7 FPS, but at 4K Medium it drops to 43.3 FPS, a 35% reduction. At 4K Ultra, the frame rate falls to 33 FPS, which is nearly half of the 1440p Medium result. The processor's performance is more than sufficient for this game, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44167 and Geekbench multi-core score of 21462. The data suggests that even at 1080p Low with 119.9 FPS, the CPU is not limiting performance, as the GPU is still the primary constraint. For users seeking higher frame rates, overclocking or upgrading the GPU would yield far more benefit than changing the processor.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that maintains at least 60 FPS is Low, which produces an average of 61.8 FPS. The Medium preset falls short at 43.3 FPS, and High drops to 40.9 FPS. Ultra is the worst performer at 33 FPS. For a smooth 4K experience, users must accept Low settings, which still delivers a playable frame rate but sacrifices visual fidelity.
At 2560x1440, the situation improves significantly. The Medium preset achieves 66.7 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS threshold with some headroom. This is the best playable setting, as High drops to 53.7 FPS and Ultra to 51.3 FPS. Low is also playable at 87.4 FPS, but Medium offers a better balance of visual quality and performance. Users with 1440p monitors should target Medium for a comfortable experience.
At 1920x1080, the system has enough performance to run the game at the maximum Ultra preset, which averages 66.6 FPS. This is above the 60 FPS threshold, though not by a large margin. High runs at 76 FPS, Medium at 85.8 FPS, and Low at 119.9 FPS. For 1080p users, Ultra is the recommended setting, as it provides the best visuals while still maintaining playable frame rates. If users prefer more headroom for demanding scenes, High at 76 FPS is a safer choice.
The Verdict
This PC can run Control, but the playable settings vary dramatically by resolution. At 1920x1080, the verdict is clear: all four settings presets are playable, with Ultra delivering 66.6 FPS. This is the ideal resolution for this combo, offering the full visual experience without compromises. At 2560x1440, the system achieves playable performance on Low and Medium, with Medium providing 66.7 FPS. The High and Ultra presets fall below the 60 FPS line, so users must stick to Medium for a smooth experience. At 3840x2160, only the Low preset clears 60 FPS, hitting 61.8 FPS. The Medium, High, and Ultra presets are not playable at 43.3, 40.9, and 33 FPS respectively.
For a 1080p gamer, this setup is excellent, delivering high frame rates even at Ultra. For 1440p, it is capable but requires a settings reduction to Medium. For 4K, the system is only marginally playable on the lowest settings, which may not be worth the visual downgrade for most users. The data suggests that this pairing is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K being a stretch. The RTX 3060 Ti's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for this game at lower resolutions, but the 4K Ultra preset demands more than the GPU can deliver.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Control at 1440p with High settings?
A: No. At 2560x1440 with High settings, the average FPS is 53.7, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The Medium preset at 66.7 FPS is the highest playable option at this resolution.
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Control?
A: 1920x1080 is the best resolution, as it is the only one where the Ultra preset maintains a playable frame rate, averaging 66.6 FPS. All other resolutions require a settings reduction to stay above 60 FPS.
Q: How does the CPU affect performance in Control?
A: The Intel Core i7-14700KF is not a limiting factor. Its benchmark scores, including a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44167, show it has ample headroom. The GPU is the bottleneck at all resolutions and settings tested.
Q: Is the RTX 3060 Ti comparable to the RX 5700 XT in this game?
A: Yes. The RTX 3060 Ti has an average benchmark score of 16129, while the RX 5700 XT scores 16361, making it 1.4% faster. In real-world gaming, the difference is negligible, and both would produce similar frame rates in Control.
Q: What FPS can I expect at 4K Low settings?
A: At 3840x2160 with Low settings, the average FPS is 61.8, which just clears the 60 FPS threshold. This is the only playable setting at 4K, as Medium drops to 43.3 FPS.
Q: Does the Ultra preset at 1080p provide a stable experience?
A: The Ultra preset at 1920x1080 averages 66.6 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold. However, it has only 6.6 FPS of headroom, so demanding scenes might cause dips. The High preset at 76 FPS offers more safety margin.
How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core i7-14700KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti combination ranks 2501 out of 3720 tested combos for Control. This places it in the lower-middle range of all tested systems, which reflects the GPU's mid-range standing. The CPU is a high-end part, ranking in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, but the GPU's 59th percentile ranking pulls the overall combo down. This ranking indicates that while the processor is overqualified for this game, the GPU limits the system to mid-range performance. For context, the combo's ranking suggests that many systems with faster GPUs, even paired with weaker CPUs, would outperform it in Control. The data confirms that this is not a top-tier setup for this game, but it is perfectly adequate for 1080p and 1440p play. Users considering this combo should prioritize a GPU upgrade if they want to improve performance in Control, as the CPU has significant headroom.