Control

The Intel Core i7-12700KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti delivers a top-tier performance experience in Control, ranking in the 90th percentile of all tested combinations. With an average FPS of 131.1 at 1080p Ultra settings and 63.9 at 4K Ultra, this combo comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS playability threshold at every resolution and preset tested. The data confirms that this system is overqualified for the game’s demands, providing substantial headroom for high-refresh-rate monitors and future content.

How This Combo Ranks

Out of 3,720 tested hardware combinations in Control, this specific pairing ranks 374th. This places it comfortably within the top 10% of all configurations, indicating that the i7-12700KF and RTX 5070 Ti combination is significantly more powerful than the vast majority of systems used to play this title. The rank reflects the combined capability of both components, and the measured FPS data supports this high standing.

The CPU itself sits in the 85th percentile when compared against all processors, with an average benchmark score of 35,365. Its closest rivals in synthetic testing are the Intel Core i7-13700T (scoring 35,403, a delta of -0.1%), the Intel Core i5-13600T (scoring 35,305, a delta of 0.2%), the Intel Core 5 213PE (scoring 35,428, a delta of -0.2%), and the Intel Core i7-12700K (scoring 35,287, a delta of 0.2%). These negligible deltas mean that from a pure processing standpoint, swapping to any of these CPUs would produce virtually identical frame rates in Control.

On the graphics side, the RTX 5070 Ti ranks in the 86th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 49,957. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (scoring 50,001, a delta of -0.1%), the Intel Arc A550M (scoring 49,737, a delta of 0.4%), the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (scoring 50,951, a delta of -2%), and the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (scoring 48,477, a delta of 3.1%). In practical terms, the RX 6900 XT would be the closest competitor, trailing by only 2%, while the RX 6800 XT is 3.1% slower. These rival comparisons indicate that the combo’s rank is driven by the GPU’s strong relative standing, with the CPU providing ample support.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data from the measured FPS reveals a clear pattern: the GPU is the dominant factor in Control at all resolutions, with the CPU playing a supporting but sufficient role. At 1920x1080, the difference between Low and Ultra settings is 235.9 FPS versus 131.1 FPS, a gap of 104.8 FPS. This substantial drop demonstrates that even at lower resolutions where CPU load is relatively higher, the graphics card’s workload scaling with settings is the primary performance driver.

As resolution increases to 2560x1440, the same pattern holds. Low settings yield 176.2 FPS, while Ultra drops to 96.1 FPS, a difference of 80.1 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p at High settings shows a reduction from 150.3 FPS to 113.0 FPS, a 24.8% decrease that is almost entirely attributable to the GPU handling more pixels. The CPU’s role becomes even less pronounced at 3840x2160, where the Ultra preset manages 63.9 FPS compared to 122.9 FPS at Low, a 59 FPS swing.

The CPU’s capability is not the bottleneck in any scenario. The i7-12700KF’s multi-threaded performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28,838 and a single-core score of 4,071, is more than adequate for Control’s engine. The game does not appear to stress the processor beyond its limits, as evidenced by the smooth scaling of FPS with GPU-bound settings. The combination of 12 cores and 20 threads ensures that background tasks and game logic do not interfere with frame pacing. In essence, the RTX 5070 Ti’s raw throughput dictates the frame rate, while the i7-12700KF ensures the GPU is never starved of data.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of performance across three resolutions and four quality presets. All figures represent average FPS, as minimum and maximum values were not recorded in the dataset.

At 1920x1080, the combo performs exceptionally well across the board. The Low preset achieves 235.9 FPS, which is extraordinarily high and suitable for competitive play or 240Hz displays. Medium settings yield 166.2 FPS, High settings produce 150.3 FPS, and Ultra settings still deliver 131.1 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a consistent 44.8% performance reduction, but even the most demanding preset remains far above the 60 FPS threshold.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains strong. Low settings produce 176.2 FPS, which drops to 128.1 FPS at Medium. High settings achieve 113.0 FPS, and Ultra settings deliver 96.1 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p at each preset is roughly 25-30%, which is typical for a resolution increase that adds 77% more pixels. The Ultra preset at this resolution still provides a 60.2% margin above the playable threshold.

At 3840x2160, the demands of 4K resolution become evident. Low settings yield 122.9 FPS, which is still highly playable. Medium settings produce 84.6 FPS, and High settings achieve 76.0 FPS. The Ultra preset drops to 63.9 FPS, which is the lowest recorded figure in the dataset but still clears the 60 FPS playability bar by a 6.5% margin. The relative performance drop from 1440p to 4K at Ultra settings is 33.5%, showing that the RTX 5070 Ti’s 16 GB of GDDR7 memory and 896.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient to handle the additional pixel load without catastrophic frame loss.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Based on the nearestRivals data for both components, several alternative configurations would produce nearly identical results in Control. On the CPU side, the Intel Core i7-13700T, Intel Core i5-13600T, Intel Core 5 213PE, and Intel Core i7-12700K all have average benchmark scores within 0.2% of the i7-12700KF. For gaming purposes, these differences are imperceptible, and any of these processors paired with the RTX 5070 Ti would yield the same measured FPS figures within a rounding error.

For the GPU, the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT is the closest match, with an average score 2% higher than the RTX 5070 Ti. This would translate to roughly 1-3 FPS difference in Control at 4K Ultra, moving from 63.9 FPS to approximately 65 FPS. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 and Intel Arc A550M have scores within 0.4% of the RTX 5070 Ti, meaning they would perform almost identically in this game. The AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT trails by 3.1%, which would equate to about 2 FPS lower at 1080p Ultra, dropping from 131.1 FPS to roughly 129 FPS.

It is important to note that these rival comparisons are based on aggregate benchmark scores, not game-specific tests. However, given the strong correlation between synthetic GPU benchmarks and Control’s rendering workload, these alternatives represent realistic substitutes. Users with any of these GPUs paired with a comparable 12th or 13th generation Intel Core i7 or i5 processor should expect frame rates within a few percent of the numbers presented here.

Best Settings per Resolution

For each resolution, the best settings are defined as the most demanding preset that maintains an average FPS at or above the 60 FPS playability threshold. The data shows that this combo can run the maximum Ultra preset at every resolution tested.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the clear choice, delivering 131.1 FPS. This is not only above the 60 FPS threshold but also high enough for 120Hz or 144Hz monitors, providing a smooth and responsive experience. There is no reason to lower settings at this resolution unless aiming for 240Hz displays, where the Low preset’s 235.9 FPS would be necessary.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset again wins, with an average of 96.1 FPS. This is 60% above the playability threshold, offering excellent visual fidelity with plenty of headroom for demanding scenes or recording software. The High preset at 113.0 FPS is also viable for users prioritizing higher refresh rates, but Ultra remains the best overall balance.

At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset is still the recommended choice, achieving 63.9 FPS. This is a slim 6.5% margin above the 60 FPS threshold, so users may want to consider the High preset at 76.0 FPS for a more comfortable buffer. However, for those who prioritize maximum visual quality and have a VRR display, Ultra at 4K is playable. The Medium preset at 84.6 FPS offers a middle ground for those who want more headroom without sacrificing too much detail.

The Verdict

This PC configuration can run Control exceptionally well at all tested resolutions and settings. The verdictByResolution data confirms that every single resolution and preset combination clears the 60 FPS playability threshold.

At 1920x1080, the system achieves a minimum of 131.1 FPS at Ultra settings, which is more than double the playability threshold. The 2560x1440 resolution is equally impressive, with the Ultra preset delivering 96.1 FPS, providing a 60.2% margin above the threshold. Even the most demanding scenario, 3840x2160 at Ultra, maintains 63.9 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS requirement.

The only caveat is the slim margin at 4K Ultra. While 63.9 FPS is technically playable, it leaves little room for frame drops in intense combat sequences or when using certain in-game effects. Users with 4K displays who prioritize a locked 60 FPS experience might prefer the High preset at 76.0 FPS for a more consistent frame rate. Overall, however, this combo is more than capable of delivering a fully playable, high-fidelity experience in Control across the board.

FAQ

*Q: Can this system run Control at 4K Ultra settings?*

A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 63.9, which is above the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Q: What is the best resolution and settings combination for a 144Hz monitor?

A: At 2560x1440, the High preset delivers 113.0 FPS, and the Ultra preset achieves 96.1 FPS, both of which are suitable for 144Hz displays. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset reaches 131.1 FPS.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 Ti compare to the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT in this game?

A: Based on average benchmark scores, the RX 6900 XT is 2% faster than the RTX 5070 Ti. This would translate to approximately 1-2 FPS difference in Control at any given resolution and settings combination.

Q: Is the Intel Core i7-12700KF a bottleneck for the RTX 5070 Ti?

A: No. The CPU’s benchmark scores, including a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28,838, indicate it has ample processing power. The FPS scaling between resolution and settings changes suggests the GPU is the primary performance limiter.

Q: What is the lowest FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The lowest average FPS in the dataset is 63.9, achieved at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings. All other combinations produce higher frame rates, with the highest being 235.9 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings.

Q: Are there any settings at 1080p that exceed 200 FPS?

A: Yes, the Low preset at 1920x1080 achieves an average of 235.9 FPS. The Medium preset at 166.2 FPS and High preset at 150.3 FPS are also notably high, but only the Low preset exceeds 200 FPS.