Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Control
Action Adventure 2019

Control

89%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
151 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
84 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
112 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
63 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
76 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
41 FPS
10.3ms Frame Time
15ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,485
Your CPU 35,365
Graphics Card
Required 27,787
Your GPU 26,331

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 41 49 54 76
1440p QHD 63 71 82 112
1080p Full HD 84 97 107 151

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 97
1920x1080 Low 151
1920x1080 Medium 107
1920x1080 Ultra 84
2560x1440 High 71
2560x1440 Low 112
2560x1440 Medium 82
2560x1440 Ultra 63
3840x2160 High 49
3840x2160 Low 76
3840x2160 Medium 54
3840x2160 Ultra 41

Performance Analysis: Control on Your System

The Intel Core i7-12700KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 delivers a playable experience in Control, but the margin of comfort depends heavily on the resolution you target. At 1080p and 1440p, this combo clears the 60 FPS threshold at every preset, while 4K requires dropping to Low settings to stay smooth. The data shows a clear pattern: this is a 1440p-class pairing that can handle 4K only with significant visual compromises.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combination is overwhelmingly fast. Low settings produce an average of 151 FPS, which is the highest figure recorded across all resolutions and presets. Medium settings still deliver 106.6 FPS, High settings reach 96.6 FPS, and even the most demanding Ultra preset maintains an average of 84.1 FPS. Every preset at 1080p runs far above the 60 FPS playable threshold, leaving substantial headroom for background tasks or future driver overhead.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance remains strong but the scaling begins to show. Low settings average 112.1 FPS, which is a 25.8% drop from the 1080p Low result. Medium settings average 81.6 FPS, High settings average 70.7 FPS, and Ultra drops to 63.2 FPS. The Ultra result is notable — it barely clears the 60 FPS line, with only a 3.2 FPS margin of safety. This means 1440p Ultra is technically playable but leaves little room for stutters or demanding combat sequences.

At 3840x2160, the picture changes dramatically. Low settings average 75.6 FPS, which is still comfortably above 60 FPS. Medium settings fall to 53.7 FPS, High settings average 48.9 FPS, and Ultra drops to 40.9 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium at 4K is 21.9 FPS, indicating a steep performance cliff when the render load increases beyond the minimum preset. None of the min or max FPS values are recorded in the data, so the analysis relies solely on average frame rates, but the trend is unambiguous: 4K requires Low settings to maintain playability.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance scaling across resolutions reveals how the RTX 5060 becomes the dominant constraint as resolution rises. At 1080p, the CPU has more room to feed frames, and the GPU is the primary limiter even at Low settings — the 151 FPS result suggests the i7-12700KF can push well beyond what the GPU can render at higher presets. This is consistent with the CPU's benchmark standing: it sits at the 85th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 35365, placing it within 0.2% of the Intel Core i7-12700K.

At 1440p, the GPU load increases, but the CPU still has enough headroom to keep the system balanced. The transition from Low to Ultra at 1440p costs 48.9 FPS (from 112.1 to 63.2), which is a proportional response to the increased GPU workload. The CPU's role is less prominent here, as the RTX 5060's Blackwell 2.0 architecture with 3840 shading units and 448.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth handles the fill rate demands without bottlenecking.

At 4K, the GPU is unequivocally the limiting factor. The RTX 5060's 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus is taxed heavily at 3840x2160. The 40.9 FPS Ultra result is 45.9% below the 1080p Ultra figure, a much larger drop than the 2.25x pixel count would suggest. This indicates that memory bandwidth and rasterization throughput, not CPU performance, determine the outcome. The i7-12700KF's 12 cores and 20 threads are more than sufficient for Control's engine at any resolution; the data shows no scenario where the CPU's 3.60 GHz base and 5.00 GHz boost clocks create a bottleneck.

FAQ

*Q: Can this PC run Control at 60 FPS on a 4K monitor?*

A: Only at Low settings. The measured average at 3840x2160 Low is 75.6 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS threshold. Medium settings average 53.7 FPS, which falls below the playable threshold, and High and Ultra are progressively worse at 48.9 FPS and 40.9 FPS respectively.

Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming?

A: Ultra is the best preset that stays at or above 60 FPS. It averages 63.2 FPS at 2560x1440, which is just above the playable threshold. High averages 70.7 FPS, Medium averages 81.6 FPS, and Low averages 112.1 FPS, but Ultra offers the highest visual quality without dropping below 60 FPS.

Q: How does the RTX 5060 compare to its nearest rivals in raw GPU benchmarks?

A: The RTX 5060 has an average benchmark score of 26331, placing it at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs. It is 0.3% slower than the AMD Radeon 860M (26401) and the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (26421), 0.8% slower than the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary (26553), and 1.2% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT (26011). These are narrow margins, indicating the RTX 5060 sits in a tight performance cluster.

Q: Is the i7-12700KF a strong match for this game?

A: Yes. The CPU's average benchmark score of 35365 places it at the 85th percentile among all CPUs. It is effectively tied with the Intel Core i7-13700T (35403, -0.1%), Intel Core i5-13600T (35305, +0.2%), Intel Core 5 213PE (35428, -0.2%), and Intel Core i7-12700K (35287, +0.2%). For Control, the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions, so the CPU's strong single-thread and multi-thread scores provide no noticeable constraint.

Q: What FPS can I expect at 1080p with High settings?

A: The measured average is 96.6 FPS. This is well above the 60 FPS threshold and leaves headroom for High settings without any concern. Ultra at 1080p averages 84.1 FPS, so even the most demanding preset is comfortable.

*Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations for Control?*

A: It ranks 1646th out of 3720 tested combos, placing it in the middle of the distribution. This is a solid but not exceptional ranking; it reflects the balanced nature of the pairing, where the GPU's 72nd percentile standing and the CPU's 85th percentile standing combine to deliver consistently playable frame rates at 1080p and 1440p.

The Verdict

The data is clear: this PC can run Control at 60 FPS, but only under specific conditions. At 1920x1080, every preset — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — exceeds 60 FPS, with averages ranging from 84.1 FPS to 151 FPS. This is the resolution where the combo performs best, and Ultra settings are fully playable with a comfortable margin.

At 2560x1440, all four presets also clear 60 FPS, but Ultra is the boundary case. The average of 63.2 FPS is only 3.2 FPS above the playable threshold, so while it qualifies, it is the least safe option. High at 70.7 FPS provides more stability, and Medium and Low are increasingly comfortable.

At 3840x2160, the verdict is restrictive. Only Low settings average above 60 FPS at 75.6 FPS. Medium at 53.7 FPS, High at 48.9 FPS, and Ultra at 40.9 FPS all fall short. If 4K is the target, the user must accept Low settings or reduce the resolution.

How This Combo Ranks

Among the 3720 tested combos for Control, this pairing ranks 1646th. This places it in the 55.7th percentile of tested configurations, which is a middle-of-the-pack result. The ranking reflects the RTX 5060's position relative to other GPUs: it sits at the 72nd percentile globally, but the nearest rivals — the AMD Radeon 860M, NVIDIA GeForce MX550, AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary, and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT — are all within a 1.2% performance delta. This tight clustering means the RTX 5060 is not an outlier in either direction, and the combo's rank is largely determined by the CPU's strong showing at the 85th percentile.

The data indicates that the i7-12700KF is not the limiting factor in this pairing. Its benchmark scores are within 0.2% of the i7-12700K, and its multi-thread score of 28838 in Cinebench R23 demonstrates ample headroom for Control's engine. The GPU, with its 8 GB memory capacity and 128-bit bus, is the component that dictates the 4K performance ceiling.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which averages 84.1 FPS. This is the recommended setting for the best visual quality without sacrificing playability.

At 2560x1440, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, averaging 63.2 FPS. This is the maximum visual quality option, but the narrow margin above 60 FPS suggests users who prioritize stability over visuals might prefer High at 70.7 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Low, averaging 75.6 FPS. This is the only playable option at 4K, and it requires significant visual compromises. Users targeting 4K should consider whether the graphical downgrade to Low is acceptable, or whether 1440p Ultra provides a better balance of image quality and frame rate.