Control

The Intel Core i5-14400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER combination delivers a commanding performance in Control, placing in the 83rd percentile for both the CPU and GPU relative to all tested hardware. With a combo rank of 639 out of 3,720 tested configurations, this system sits comfortably in the top tier for this title, demonstrating that it can handle the game's demands across the board. The data shows that this pairing is not merely adequate but exceptionally well-suited to Control's action-heavy environments and physics-driven combat.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank of 639 out of 3,720 tested combinations places it in the top 17% of all systems evaluated for Control. This is a strong showing, though not an elite top-100 placement, indicating that while the hardware is powerful, there are faster configurations available for those seeking absolute maximum frame rates. The CPU's percentile of 83 versus all CPUs, combined with the GPU's identical 83rd percentile versus all GPUs, suggests a balanced pairing where neither component is a significant bottleneck. This balance is crucial for a game like Control, which can be demanding on both the processor for AI and physics calculations and the graphics card for rendering its destructible environments.

Benchmark results indicate that the Core i5-14400F, with its 10 cores and 16 threads, delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,645 and a single-core score of 3,055, which are solid figures for a mid-range desktop processor. On the graphics side, the RTX 4070 SUPER produces a PassMark G3D score of 29,995 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 205,624, confirming its capability as a high-end 1440p and capable 4K card. The combination of these scores in a real-world game scenario results in the measured FPS figures that place this system well above the 60 FPS playable threshold at every resolution tested, which is the primary takeaway for gamers.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the nearest rivals by average benchmark score, the Intel Core i5-14400F is essentially performance-identical to several other processors. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U is a mere 0.1% faster, and the Intel Core i9-11900 is 0.2% faster, while the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS is 0.2% slower. In practical terms, these differences are imperceptible in gaming, so any of these CPUs would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Control when paired with the same GPU. The Intel Core i7-12800H is 0.5% faster, again a negligible margin. For users considering a platform change, these rivals would behave effectively the same as the i5-14400F in this title.

On the GPU side, the RTX 4070 SUPER is similarly matched with its nearest rivals. The NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB is 0.1% slower, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile is also 0.1% slower. The NVIDIA Quadro M6000 is 0.2% slower, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is 1% slower. Notably, the RTX 4090 Mobile being slower than the desktop RTX 4070 SUPER in this benchmark dataset confirms the performance of the desktop card. These rival GPUs would produce nearly identical FPS in Control, meaning that swapping the RTX 4070 SUPER for any of these would yield a very similar experience, with differences well within the margin of error for benchmark testing.

FAQ

Q: What is the best settings preset for this PC at 4K resolution?

A: Based on the measured data, the best settings preset at 3840x2160 is "Ultra," which achieves an average of 60 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that still clears the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: Can this system maintain 60 FPS at 1440p with all settings maxed out?

A: Yes. At 2560x1440 with "Ultra" settings, the system produces an average of 89 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold. Even the "High" preset at this resolution yields 102 FPS.

Q: How does the RTX 4070 SUPER compare to the RTX 4090 Mobile in this game?

A: The benchmark data shows that the RTX 4070 SUPER has a 1% higher average benchmark score than the RTX 4090 Mobile, indicating that the desktop card is slightly faster for this title.

Q: What is the maximum average FPS achievable at 1080p?

A: The highest average FPS at 1920x1080 is achieved with the "Low" preset, which delivers 214 FPS. The "Ultra" preset at 1080p still produces a very high 118 FPS.

*Q: Is the Core i5-14400F a bottleneck for the RTX 4070 SUPER in Control?*

A: Given the high frame rates across all resolutions, the data does not indicate a significant bottleneck. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking and its close performance to rivals like the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U and Core i9-11900 suggest it provides ample processing power for this game.

Q: Are all settings presets playable at every resolution?

A: Yes, the verdict data indicates that at 3840x2160, 2560x1440, and 1920x1080, all four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable, meaning they all achieve an average of at least 60 FPS.

The Verdict

This PC configuration is unequivocally capable of running Control at a high level. The verdict by resolution confirms that at every tested resolution—3840x2160, 2560x1440, and 1920x1080—all settings presets are playable. At 4K, the system achieves 60 FPS on the "Ultra" preset, which is the maximum visual quality setting. At 1440p, the "Ultra" preset delivers a comfortable 89 FPS, and at 1080p, it reaches 118 FPS. This means users can enjoy the game with the highest graphical fidelity at 4K and still maintain a smooth 60 FPS experience, or prioritize higher refresh rates at lower resolutions.

The data shows that the system clears the 60 FPS threshold with significant headroom at 1440p and 1080p, making it ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors. Even at the demanding 4K resolution, the "High" preset yields 69 FPS, and the "Medium" preset reaches 78 FPS, providing options for those who prefer higher frame rates over maximum visual fidelity. This is a well-balanced system that delivers a smooth and visually impressive experience for Control without requiring any compromises at standard gaming resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the system's performance ranges from an average of 60 FPS on "Ultra" to 110 FPS on "Low." The "High" preset averages 69 FPS, while "Medium" averages 78 FPS with a minimum of 66 and a maximum of 90. This shows a clear scaling pattern where each step down in settings provides a significant FPS boost, with the jump from "Ultra" to "High" being 9 FPS and from "High" to "Medium" being another 9 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates are substantially higher. The "Ultra" preset averages 89 FPS, "High" averages 102 FPS, and "Medium" averages 115 FPS with a minimum of 98 and a maximum of 133. The "Low" preset reaches an average of 162 FPS. The difference between "Ultra" and "Low" is 73 FPS, showcasing the GPU's headroom at this resolution. For 1920x1080, the system is even more prolific, with "Ultra" averaging 118 FPS, "High" at 135 FPS, and "Medium" at 152 FPS with a minimum of 130 and a maximum of 175. The "Low" preset averages 214 FPS, which is excellent for competitive or high-refresh-rate play. The consistent scaling across all three resolutions indicates a well-optimized game engine and a capable hardware combination.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is "Ultra," which achieves an average of exactly 60 FPS. This is the highest quality setting available and provides a playable experience at 4K. For 2560x1440, the "Ultra" preset is also the best choice, delivering an average of 89 FPS, which provides smooth gameplay with ample headroom above the 60 FPS threshold. At 1920x1080, the "Ultra" preset again is the best option, producing an average of 118 FPS. This allows for maximum visual quality at 1080p while still maintaining frame rates high enough for most high-refresh-rate monitors.

The data suggests that players do not need to compromise on visual settings at any resolution. The system is powerful enough to run Control at its maximum preset, "Ultra," at all tested resolutions while maintaining at least 60 FPS. This is a rare and desirable outcome, as it allows users to experience the game exactly as the developers intended, with all graphical features enabled, without worrying about performance drops below the playable threshold. Whether gaming on a 4K television, a 1440p monitor, or a 1080p display, this configuration provides an excellent experience.