Control

The Intel Core i5-12400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti delivers a performance profile in Control that is defined by a strong CPU foundation and a GPU capable of extreme frame rates. The processor, scoring 19,039 on average and sitting in the 73rd percentile of all CPUs, is closely matched by the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (0% delta) and the Intel Core 3 201E (-0.1% delta), indicating that similar CPUs would not bottleneck the experience. On the GPU side, the RTX 5070 Ti, with an average benchmark score of 49,957 and an 86th percentile ranking, is bracketed by the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (-0.1% delta) and the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (-2% delta), meaning that systems with those graphics cards would produce nearly identical frame rates. The data confirms that this combination is not just playable but overwhelmingly capable, with the measured FPS showing that the title’s demands are met with significant headroom across all tested configurations.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The benchmark data provides a clear picture of which alternative hardware would replicate this combo’s behavior in Control. For the CPU, the Intel Core i5-12400F’s nearest rivals are remarkably close in aggregate performance. The AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS scores 19,047, a delta of 0% from the i5-12400F’s 19,039, suggesting that a system built around that mobile chip would deliver nearly identical frame pacing and CPU-bound results. The Intel Core 3 201E is just 0.1% slower, while the Intel Core i5-1335U is 0.3% faster, all within a negligible margin. This implies that any of these processors would provide the same level of support for the RTX 5070 Ti, ensuring that the GPU remains the primary driver of performance in most scenarios.

For the GPU, the nearest rival data is more varied but still indicates that the RTX 5070 Ti’s performance class is well-defined. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has an average score of 50,001, a delta of -0.1% from the RTX 5070 Ti’s 49,957, meaning that a system with that older card would produce nearly identical FPS in Control. The Intel Arc A550M is 0.4% slower, while the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT is 2% faster and the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT is 3.1% slower. In practical terms, a gamer with an RX 6900 XT would see a slight FPS advantage, but the differences are small enough that the overall experience—high frame rates at all resolutions—would be comparable. The data suggests that the RTX 5070 Ti is positioned in a performance tier where minor swings in synthetic scores translate to only a few frames per second in real-world gameplay.

How This Combo Ranks

Looking at the combo’s standing among all tested hardware configurations, the i5-12400F + RTX 5070 Ti combination ranks 389th out of 3,720 tested combos for Control. This places it in the top 10.5% of all systems, a strong result that indicates the pairing is well above average for this title. The rank reflects the balance between the CPU’s 73rd percentile standing and the GPU’s 86th percentile standing, with the GPU clearly being the more dominant component. The high rank is corroborated by the measured FPS data, which shows that even the most demanding preset at 4K (Ultra, 65 FPS average) clears the 60 FPS playability threshold, and lower resolutions produce frame rates that are multiples of that baseline. The data implies that this combo is not just marginally playable but is positioned to handle Control with substantial performance reserves, making it a strong choice for high-refresh-rate monitors at 1440p and solid 4K experiences.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data reveals a clear scaling pattern across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the Low preset averages 232 FPS, which is exceptionally high and indicates that the CPU is not a limiting factor at this resolution. Moving to Medium drops the average to 165 FPS (min 140, max 190), High to 146 FPS, and Ultra to 127 FPS. The delta between Low and Ultra is 105 FPS, showing that graphical settings have a substantial impact but that even the highest preset remains far above playable thresholds. At 2560x1440, the trend continues: Low averages 176 FPS, Medium 125 FPS (min 106, max 143), High 111 FPS, and Ultra 96 FPS. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is consistent, with each preset losing roughly 25-30% of its frame rate, which is typical for a resolution increase of that magnitude.

At 3840x2160, the GPU begins to show its limits, though it still performs admirably. Low averages 119 FPS, Medium 84 FPS (min 72, max 97), High 75 FPS, and Ultra 65 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra at 4K shows a 54 FPS spread, with the Ultra preset barely clearing the 60 FPS threshold. The min FPS data for Medium at 4K (72 FPS) is particularly telling, as it indicates that even in demanding scenes, the frame rate does not dip below playable levels. The data shows that the RTX 5070 Ti’s 16 GB of GDDR7 memory and 896.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient to handle 4K textures without stuttering, and the GPU’s 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 compute ensures that the game’s physics and particle effects are rendered smoothly.

FAQ

*Q: Is the Intel Core i5-12400F a bottleneck for the RTX 5070 Ti in Control?*

A: No. The CPU’s benchmark scores (e.g., 12,380 in Cinebench R23 multi-core) and its 73rd percentile ranking indicate that it provides ample processing power. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 232 FPS, which shows that the CPU can feed the GPU effectively without holding it back.

Q: What is the best preset to use at 4K for a consistent 60+ FPS experience?

A: The Ultra preset at 3840x2160 averages 65 FPS, making it the best visually demanding option that stays above the 60 FPS threshold. The High preset is also viable at 75 FPS, but Ultra offers higher fidelity without sacrificing playability.

Q: How much of a performance difference is there between 1440p and 1080p?

A: At Ultra settings, 1440p averages 96 FPS while 1080p averages 127 FPS, a 31 FPS difference. For the Low preset, the gap is larger: 176 FPS at 1440p versus 232 FPS at 1080p, a 56 FPS difference, indicating that lower settings amplify the resolution scaling.

*Q: Does the RTX 5070 Ti’s 16 GB VRAM matter for Control?*

A: The data shows that at 4K Ultra, the combo maintains 65 FPS with no min FPS data suggesting drops, which implies that the 16 GB memory capacity is sufficient for the game’s textures and assets at maximum settings.

Q: How does this combo compare to systems with the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT?

A: The RX 6900 XT has a benchmark score that is 2% higher than the RTX 5070 Ti, so it would produce slightly higher FPS in Control. However, the difference is minor, and both GPUs would deliver playable frame rates at all resolutions and presets.

*Q: Is the i5-12400F’s 6-core/12-thread configuration adequate for modern titles like Control?*

A: Yes, the 12,380 score in Cinebench R23 multi-core and the 19,039 average benchmark score show that the CPU handles multi-threaded workloads effectively. The game’s performance is not CPU-limited in the measured data, as evidenced by the high FPS at 1080p.

CPU and GPU Roles

The division of labor between the i5-12400F and RTX 5070 Ti in Control shifts predictably with resolution. At 1920x1080, the CPU plays a more significant role, as evidenced by the 232 FPS average on Low settings. This high frame rate is only achievable if the CPU can process game logic and draw calls quickly enough, and the i5-12400F’s 4.40 GHz boost clock and 18 MB L3 cache are sufficient for this task. However, the GPU is still the dominant factor, as the 105 FPS drop from Low to Ultra at 1080p shows that the RTX 5070 Ti’s rendering capabilities are the primary constraint.

At 2560x1440, the GPU’s workload increases, and the CPU’s influence wanes. The frame rates drop by approximately 25-30% across all presets compared to 1080p, which is a direct result of the higher pixel count stressing the GPU’s 96 ROPs and 280 TMUs. The CPU continues to provide consistent performance, with no signs of bottlenecking, as the 96 FPS average at Ultra is still well above the playable threshold. At 3840x2160, the GPU is unequivocally the limiting factor. The 4K resolution demands more from the 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 896.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, resulting in a 65 FPS average at Ultra. The CPU’s role is reduced to maintaining stability, which it does effectively, as the min FPS at 4K Medium (72 FPS) does not indicate any CPU-induced stuttering.

The scaling between presets also highlights the GPU’s dominance. At 4K, the difference between Low (119 FPS) and Ultra (65 FPS) is 54 FPS, while at 1080p, the same comparison yields a 105 FPS difference. This suggests that at higher resolutions, the GPU is so heavily taxed that even reducing settings has a smaller absolute impact, whereas at lower resolutions, the GPU has more headroom to exploit. The data implies that for this combo, the RTX 5070 Ti is the component to upgrade for better 4K performance, while the i5-12400F is a stable foundation that will not need replacing for this game.

Best Settings per Resolution

For each resolution, the most demanding preset that maintains an average of at least 60 FPS is the Ultra setting. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset achieves an average of 127 FPS, which is more than double the playability threshold and provides a smooth experience on high-refresh-rate monitors. At 2560x1440, Ultra still delivers 96 FPS, which is ideal for 144Hz displays and leaves ample headroom for demanding scenes. At 3840x2160, Ultra averages 65 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS threshold but with less margin than lower resolutions.

The data for Medium presets provides additional context. At 4K, Medium averages 84 FPS with a min of 72 FPS, which is a safer choice for those who prioritize frame rate stability over visual fidelity. However, since Ultra is still playable, there is no need to compromise. The High preset at 4K (75 FPS) is also viable, but the Ultra preset offers the best visual experience without dropping below 60 FPS. For all resolutions, the verdict is clear: the combo can handle the maximum settings, making the choice of preset a matter of preference rather than a performance necessity.

The Verdict

The data unequivocally shows that this PC can run Control at all tested resolutions and settings. The verdict by resolution confirms that 3840x2160, 2560x1440, and 1920x1080 all have playable settings at the Ultra preset, with average FPS of 65, 96, and 127, respectively. The Ultra preset is the best choice at every resolution, as it provides the highest visual quality while staying above the 60 FPS threshold. The minimum FPS data, available for Medium presets, shows that frame dips are not a concern, with 4K Medium min FPS at 72 and 1440p Medium min FPS at 106. The combo’s 389th rank out of 3,720 tested systems further reinforces that this is a high-performing configuration. For gamers seeking a definitive answer: the i5-12400F and RTX 5070 Ti deliver a flawless Control experience, with the only limitation being the display’s refresh rate, as the GPU can push frame rates well beyond 60 FPS at 1080p and 1440p.