Control

The Intel Core i5-12400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT is a potent combination for Control, placing in the 1233rd position out of 3720 tested combos. This percentile placement indicates a strong, above-average system, though the data reveals that achieving a flawless experience depends heavily on the chosen resolution and preset. The benchmark results show a system capable of high refresh rates at mainstream resolutions, but one that requires careful settings management to maintain smooth gameplay at 4K.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank of 1233 out of 3720 tested configurations places it in the upper third of all systems tested, signalling a well-balanced pairing that should handle demanding titles. While the ranking is strong, it is not at the very pinnacle of performance, suggesting that other combinations of high-end components will outperform it. The CPU's percentile ranking against all processors is 73, while the GPU’s percentile against all graphics cards is 85, which indicates that the graphics card is the more dominant component in this pairing. The data implies that this system is built for high-fidelity gaming, but perhaps not for the absolute highest frame rates at maximum settings in the most demanding scenarios. The system’s overall performance is a reflection of the GPU’s strong standing, with the CPU providing sufficient support to avoid being a significant bottleneck at most resolutions.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data for Control reveals a clear shift in system dynamics as resolution increases. At 1920x1080, the processor plays a more significant role, as frame rates are high enough to expose CPU limitations in certain scenes. The jump from Low to Ultra settings at this resolution is substantial, from 176.8 FPS down to 96.3 FPS, showing that the GPU is still the primary driver of graphical fidelity. However, the CPU's influence is more apparent here than at higher resolutions. Moving to 2560x1440, the GPU's workload increases, and the CPU's relative importance diminishes slightly, as the frame rate ceiling is lowered. At 3840x2160, the GPU is the definitive bottleneck, with the CPU providing ample headroom. The scaling between 1440p and 4K is steep; for example, High settings drop from 84.6 FPS to 57.7 FPS, a significant decline that underscores the GPU's dominance at higher pixel counts. The data shows a typical progression: the CPU matters most at 1080p, while the GPU becomes the sole limiting factor at 4K.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a detailed look at performance across all settings. At 1920x1080, the system delivers exceptional performance. Low settings average 176.8 FPS, which is incredibly smooth. Medium settings maintain a high pace at 126.7 FPS, while High settings still produce a very playable 111.3 FPS. Even at Ultra, the average frame rate remains high at 96.3 FPS, ensuring a fluid experience for high-refresh-rate monitors. At 2560x1440, the system continues to perform admirably. Low settings achieve 133.4 FPS, and Medium settings are not far behind at 95.2 FPS. High settings yield a solid 84.6 FPS, and Ultra settings maintain a comfortable 75 FPS, all of which are well above the 60 FPS playability threshold.

The 4K resolution presents a more challenging scenario. At 3840x2160, Low settings are very playable, with an average of 93.4 FPS. Medium settings dip to 62.7 FPS, which is still above the playable threshold but with less headroom. High settings average 57.7 FPS, falling just short of the 60 FPS target. Ultra settings are the most demanding, producing an average of 48.3 FPS. The data clearly shows that while the system is capable at 4K, it requires a compromise on graphical presets to maintain a consistently smooth frame rate.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU's nearest rivals in terms of average benchmark score include the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS and the Intel Core 3 201E, with a 0% and -0.1% deltaPct respectively, indicating virtually identical synthetic performance. The Intel Core i5-1335U is also close, with a 0.3% deltaPct. These processors would behave similarly in CPU-bound scenarios. For the GPU, the closest rivals are the NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile and the Intel Arc A550M, with deltaPct values of 1.5% and -2.5% respectively. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 are also in the same performance bracket, with -3% deltaPct. This suggests that a system with one of these alternative GPUs would produce very similar frame rates in Control, assuming the CPU does not become a limiting factor. The data implies that these alternative components are excellent substitutes for users looking for comparable performance.

FAQ

*Q: Can this PC run Control at 60 FPS on a 4K monitor?*

A: Yes, but not on the highest settings. The data shows that at 3840x2160, the Medium preset achieves an average of 62.7 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The High and Ultra presets fall below this threshold, with averages of 57.7 FPS and 48.3 FPS respectively.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 2560x1440 resolution?

A: According to the verdictByResolution data, the Ultra preset is the best playable option at 2560x1440, maintaining an average of 75 FPS. This allows for maximum graphical fidelity while still providing a smooth experience.

Q: How much of a performance difference is there between Low and Ultra settings at 1920x1080?

A: The difference is significant. At Low settings, the average frame rate is 176.8 FPS, while at Ultra settings, it drops to 96.3 FPS. This represents an 80.5 FPS difference, showing the substantial impact of graphical presets on performance.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for this game at 4K?

A: The benchmark data indicates that the GPU is the primary factor at 3840x2160. The frame rates are consistently limited by the graphics card's rendering capabilities, as evidenced by the steep performance drop when increasing settings. The CPU has sufficient power to keep up, but the GPU's workload is the main constraint.

Q: What is this combo's rank compared to other tested systems?

A: The combo ranks 1233rd out of 3720 tested combinations. This places it in the upper third of all systems, indicating strong overall performance that is better than a majority of other configurations.

*Q: The RX 6800 XT's nearest rivals include the RTX 5070 Ti and RX Vega 64. Would these GPUs perform similarly in Control?*

A: Yes, based on their similar average benchmark scores (with deltaPct values of -3% for both), these GPUs are expected to produce very comparable frame rates in Control. Systems using these alternatives would likely see nearly identical performance, assuming other components are not bottlenecks.

The Verdict

This PC can absolutely run Control and deliver a great experience at most settings. The verdictByResolution data confirms that at 1920x1080, all presets from Low to Ultra are playable, with the Ultra preset averaging 96.3 FPS. At 2560x1440, the system again clears the 60 FPS threshold on all presets, with Ultra averaging 75 FPS. The situation changes at 3840x2160, where only the Low and Medium presets are playable. The Medium preset manages an average of 62.7 FPS, while High and Ultra fall short. Therefore, the system is fully capable of running Control at 1080p and 1440p with maximum settings, and at 4K with reduced settings.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average frame rate of 96.3 FPS. This allows for the highest visual quality while maintaining a comfortable margin above the playability threshold. For 2560x1440, the best preset is also Ultra, which averages 75 FPS, providing a fully maxed-out experience. At 3840x2160, the most demanding playable preset is Medium, with an average of 62.7 FPS. This is the only way to achieve a playable frame rate at 4K, as the High and Ultra presets cannot maintain 60 FPS. The data suggests prioritizing the Medium preset at 4K to balance visual fidelity with smooth gameplay.