Control

The Intel Core i5-12400 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 delivers a high-performance configuration for Control, a 2019 Action Adventure title. Benchmark data shows this combination is capable of running the game at maximum settings across all tested resolutions, with average frame rates ranging from 69 FPS at 4K Ultra to 135 FPS at 1080p Ultra. The system ranks in the 92nd percentile of tested combos for this game, placing it at 314 out of 3,720 configurations.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance scaling across resolutions and presets reveals a clear division of labor between the Intel Core i5-12400 and the RTX 4080. At 1920x1080, the data shows the GPU is not the primary constraint in most scenarios. Moving from Low to Ultra settings at 1080p drops the average frame rate from 231 FPS to 135 FPS, a reduction of 96 FPS. This 41.6% performance penalty from preset scaling indicates that the RTX 4080 has ample headroom at this resolution, and the CPU's six P-cores with 12 threads are capable of feeding the GPU adequately even at lower graphical loads.

At 2560x1440, the scaling pattern shifts. The average frame rate at Low settings is 186 FPS, which drops to 102 FPS at Ultra. The percentage drop from Low to Ultra at 1440p is 45.2%, slightly larger than at 1080p. This suggests that as resolution increases, the GPU begins to take on more of the workload, but the i5-12400 still provides sufficient single-thread performance to avoid becoming a bottleneck. The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 910 and Passmark single-thread score of 3,456 support this interpretation, as Control benefits from strong per-core performance.

The 3840x2160 results demonstrate the most pronounced GPU dependency. At 4K, the average frame rate ranges from 126 FPS at Low to 69 FPS at Ultra. The scaling from Low to Ultra represents a 45.2% reduction, similar to 1440p. However, the absolute frame rates are much lower, indicating that the RTX 4080's 16 GB of GDDR6X memory and 716.8 GB/s bandwidth are being utilized more heavily. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 34,457 and 48.74 TFLOPS FP32 performance are the dominant factors at this resolution.

Comparing resolution scaling at the same preset reinforces this analysis. At Ultra settings, the average FPS drops from 135 at 1080p to 102 at 1440p (a 24.4% reduction) and then to 69 at 4K (a 32.4% reduction from 1440p). The increasing percentage loss as resolution rises confirms that the RTX 4080 becomes the limiting factor at higher pixel counts, while the i5-12400's role diminishes. At Medium settings, the frame rates are 175 FPS, 132 FPS, and 89 FPS for 1080p, 1440p, and 4K respectively, showing a similar pattern of GPU-bound scaling at higher resolutions.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the Intel Core i5-12400 provide context for its CPU-level performance. The AMD EPYC 7643 has an average benchmark score of 18,697, which is 0.1% higher than the i5-12400's 18,683 average. This places the EPYC 7643 effectively at parity, though it is a very different class of processor. The Intel Core i7-1355U scores 18,730, 0.3% higher, and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 scores 18,811, 0.7% higher. These close scores suggest that in CPU-bound scenarios, these processors would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Control, despite their different architectures and market positions.

On the lower side, the Intel Core i3-14100F has an average score of 18,519, which is 0.9% lower than the i5-12400. This small delta means the i3-14100F would likely produce very similar results in most gaming scenarios, though the i5-12400 maintains a slight edge. The i5-12400's percentile rank of 72 among all CPUs indicates it sits above the majority of processors, but these rivals show that the performance envelope is tight at this level.

For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is the closest rival with an average score of 54,209, just 0.1% higher than the RTX 4080's 54,247. This negligible difference means users would observe virtually identical frame rates in Control when comparing these two cards. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54,828, which is 1.1% higher, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55,698, 2.6% higher. Interestingly, these AMD cards score higher on the aggregate benchmark, but the RTX 4080's 76 RT cores and 304 Tensor cores may provide advantages in specific workloads that the aggregate score does not fully capture.

The AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55,757, 2.7% higher than the RTX 4080. These rivals indicate that the RTX 4080 is positioned in a competitive performance band where small percentage differences translate to minor FPS variations. For Control specifically, the data shows that all these GPUs would deliver playable frame rates at every resolution and preset combination tested.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the i5-12400 and RTX 4080 combination delivers exceptional performance across all presets. The Low preset achieves an average of 231 FPS, while Medium reaches 175 FPS with a minimum of 149 FPS and a maximum of 201 FPS. High settings produce 156 FPS average, and Ultra maintains 135 FPS. All presets at 1080p clear the 60 FPS playable threshold by a substantial margin, with even the most demanding Ultra preset running at more than double the threshold.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain high but show the expected reduction from increased pixel count. Low settings average 186 FPS, Medium averages 132 FPS with a range of 113 to 152 FPS, High averages 118 FPS, and Ultra averages 102 FPS. The minimum recorded frame rate at Medium settings is 113 FPS, which still comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS threshold. The data indicates smooth performance throughout, with no preset dropping below the playable threshold.

At 3840x2160, the RTX 4080's capabilities are pushed further. Low settings average 126 FPS, Medium averages 89 FPS with a minimum of 76 FPS and maximum of 103 FPS, High averages 79 FPS, and Ultra averages 69 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K is the most demanding scenario tested, yet it still maintains an average above the 60 FPS threshold. The Medium preset's minimum of 76 FPS shows that even in demanding scenes, the frame rate stays well above playable levels. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 4K represents a 45.2% performance reduction, consistent with the pattern observed at lower resolutions.

The Verdict

The data shows that this PC configuration can run Control at or above 60 FPS at every resolution and preset combination tested. At 3840x2160, all four presets are playable, with the Ultra preset achieving 69 FPS average, which serves as the best settings at this resolution. The High preset at 79 FPS and Medium at 89 FPS provide additional headroom if higher frame rates are preferred over maximum visual quality.

At 2560x1440, all presets are playable with Ultra settings averaging 102 FPS. This represents the sweet spot for this configuration, as the visual fidelity of Ultra settings is combined with frame rates that exceed 100 FPS. The Medium preset's minimum of 113 FPS ensures consistent performance even in the most demanding scenes.

At 1920x1080, all presets are playable, with Ultra settings averaging 135 FPS. This resolution offers the highest frame rates, with Low settings reaching 231 FPS for users with high refresh rate displays. The verdict is clear: this combination can run Control at maximum settings at any resolution from 1080p to 4K without dropping below the 60 FPS threshold.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Control at 4K Ultra settings?

A: Yes, the data shows an average of 69 FPS at 3840x2160 Ultra settings, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best resolution for this configuration?

A: At 2560x1440 Ultra settings, the average frame rate is 102 FPS, which balances visual quality with high performance. This is the most demanding preset that stays comfortably above 60 FPS with significant headroom.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 compare to the RTX 4080 SUPER?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 54,209, which is 0.1% higher than the RTX 4080's 54,247. In practical terms, the performance difference in Control is negligible.

Q: Is the CPU a bottleneck at 1080p?

A: The data shows frame rates up to 231 FPS at 1080p Low settings, indicating the i5-12400 provides sufficient performance to keep the GPU well-fed. The CPU's single-thread benchmark scores support this conclusion.

Q: What is the minimum frame rate recorded?

A: The lowest minimum frame rate recorded is 76 FPS at 4K Medium settings, which remains above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations?

A: This combination ranks 314 out of 3,720 tested combos, placing it in the top 8.4% of all configurations for Control.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which achieves an average of 69 FPS. This provides the maximum visual quality while maintaining playable performance. Users prioritizing higher frame rates could select High at 79 FPS or Medium at 89 FPS, but Ultra is the best choice for visual fidelity.

At 2560x1440, Ultra settings are the best option, averaging 102 FPS. This delivers the highest visual quality while maintaining frame rates well above the 60 FPS threshold. The data shows that even the most demanding scenes at this resolution would remain smooth.

At 1920x1080, Ultra settings average 135 FPS, making it the best choice for this resolution. The high frame rate provides an excellent experience on standard 60 Hz displays and leaves room for higher refresh rate monitors. The Ultra preset at 1080p offers the best balance of visual quality and performance across all tested configurations.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i5-12400 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 combination ranks 314 out of 3,720 tested configurations for Control, placing it in the top 8.4% of all systems tested. This high ranking reflects the strong performance demonstrated across all resolutions and presets. The CPU's 72nd percentile ranking among all CPUs and the GPU's 86th percentile ranking among all GPUs contribute to this strong overall position.

The rank of 314 out of 3,720 indicates that while this is a high-performing configuration, there are 313 tested combinations that achieve better performance in Control. These would likely include systems with higher-end CPUs paired with the same or more powerful GPUs, or configurations with multiple GPUs. However, the data shows that this combination's performance is sufficient to run Control at maximum settings at all tested resolutions, which is the practical benchmark for playability. The combination's rank demonstrates that it performs well above average, but the specific frame rate data provides the most relevant information for determining whether this system meets an individual user's performance expectations.