Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Control
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 39 | 43 | 53 | 71 |
| 1440p QHD | 60 | 68 | 75 | 104 |
| 1080p Full HD | 75 | 88 | 98 | 139 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Control on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 presents a fascinating split in Control: a top-tier CPU feeding a mid-range GPU. The benchmark data shows this combo is heavily GPU-bound at higher resolutions, but the CPU's strength ensures that even at 1080p, frame rates remain high. This analysis breaks down the measured performance to determine exactly where this system stands.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data for Control shows a clear performance hierarchy across resolutions and settings. At 3840x2160 (4K), the system struggles to maintain high frame rates. With Ultra settings, the average FPS drops to 38.6, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. High settings improve this to 43.3 FPS, while Medium settings reach 53.1 FPS. The only playable option at 4K is Low settings, which delivers 71.4 FPS. This pattern indicates that the RTX 4060's 8 GB memory and 128-bit bus are simply overwhelmed by the pixel count at 4K.
Moving to 2560x1440 (QHD), the situation improves substantially. Low settings produce 104.4 FPS, Medium hits 75.3 FPS, and High reaches 67.9 FPS. The standout result is Ultra settings, which manages 60.2 FPS—just barely clearing the playable threshold. This suggests that at QHD, the GPU has enough bandwidth to handle the game's demands, and the CPU's 16 cores and 32 threads are not the limiting factor.
At 1920x1080 (FHD), the system performs admirably across all settings. Low settings deliver 139.1 FPS, Medium yields 97.6 FPS, High produces 88.3 FPS, and Ultra holds at 74.6 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is significant—about 64 FPS—which shows that the game's visual effects scale heavily with settings. The Ryzen 9 9950X3D's strong single-thread score of 1292 in 3DMark ensures that even at 1080p, where CPU load is higher, the frame delivery remains consistent.
The data shows no min or max FPS values, only averages. This means the analysis relies on sustained performance rather than peak or trough behavior. The absence of minimum frame data is notable, as it could hide stuttering issues, but the averages suggest a stable experience at most settings.
Comparing the resolution scaling, dropping from 1080p Ultra (74.6 FPS) to 1440p Ultra (60.2 FPS) costs about 19% performance. Dropping further to 4K Ultra (38.6 FPS) costs another 36% relative to 1440p. This is typical of a GPU-bound scenario where the RTX 4060's 272.0 GB/s memory bandwidth becomes the bottleneck.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Control at 4K with high settings?
A: No. At 3840x2160 with High settings, the average FPS is 43.3, which is well below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Only Low settings at 4K are playable, delivering 71.4 FPS.
Q: What is the best quality preset at 1440p that stays above 60 FPS?
A: The Ultra preset at 2560x1440 achieves 60.2 FPS, which just clears the playable threshold. This is the most demanding preset that remains playable at QHD.
Q: How much performance improves from 4K to 1080p at Ultra settings?
A: At 4K Ultra, the average FPS is 38.6. At 1080p Ultra, it rises to 74.6. That is a 93% improvement in frame rate when moving down two resolution steps.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this combo?
A: The data suggests the GPU is the primary bottleneck. At 1080p, the Ryzen 9 9950X3D's single-thread score of 1292 and multi-thread score of 17184 in 3DMark provide ample headroom. The RTX 4060's percentile rank of 61 versus the CPU's 95 indicates the GPU is the weaker component.
Q: Does the game run better on Low or Medium settings at 1080p?
A: Low settings produce 139.1 FPS, while Medium produces 97.6 FPS. The difference of 41.5 FPS is substantial, so users wanting maximum smoothness should choose Low, while those wanting better visuals can choose Medium.
Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations?
A: This combination ranks 2050 out of 3720 tested combos for Control. This places it in the lower-middle portion of the ranking, reflecting the GPU's limitations despite the strong CPU.
Best Settings per Resolution
For 3840x2160, the only playable setting is Low, which delivers 71.4 FPS. Even Medium settings at 4K drop to 53.1 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. Users with 4K displays must accept Low settings for smooth gameplay.
At 2560x1440, the best playable preset is Ultra, achieving 60.2 FPS. This is a rare case where the highest quality settings remain playable at QHD. The margin is thin, though, so users should monitor for frame drops in heavy combat scenes.
For 1920x1080, the Ultra preset runs at 74.6 FPS, which is comfortably above the threshold. This is the recommended setting for 1080p users who want the full visual experience without sacrificing smoothness. The High preset at 88.3 FPS is a safer alternative if users prefer more headroom.
The pattern is clear: the RTX 4060 can handle Control's engine well at lower resolutions, but 4K is only viable with significant graphical compromises. The CPU's performance is never the limiting factor, as even the most demanding CPU scenarios at 1080p Low (139.1 FPS) do not come close to stressing the Ryzen 9 9950X3D's capabilities.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The CPU's nearest rivals show that the Ryzen 9 9950X3D sits in a tightly packed group. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 scores an average of 75738 in benchmarks, which is 0.1% lower. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D scores 75716, also 0.1% behind. The AMD EPYC 8224P scores 75582 (0.3% behind), and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 scores 75488 (0.4% behind). These deltas are negligible in real-world gaming, so users can expect virtually identical CPU performance from any of these processors in Control.
On the GPU side, the RTX 4060's nearest rivals are unexpected. The AMD Radeon HD 7790 scores 17666 in benchmarks, which is 0.2% higher. The AMD Radeon 780M scores 17588 (0.3% lower), the AMD Radeon Pro 560 scores 17551 (0.5% lower), and the AMD Radeon Pro 460 scores 17509 (0.7% lower). These are all older or integrated graphics solutions that happen to score similarly in synthetic benchmarks. In practice, the RTX 4060's 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores give it features that these rivals lack, but the raw compute scores are comparable.
For gaming specifically, the RTX 4060's 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth are the defining characteristics. The rival GPUs listed here do not match this memory configuration, so benchmark similarity does not necessarily translate to identical gaming performance in Control. However, the data shows that the RTX 4060's average benchmark score of 17639 is close to its rivals, meaning users upgrading from these older cards would see similar raw performance in compute-heavy tasks.
The Verdict
This PC can run Control, but the experience depends heavily on the target resolution. At 1920x1080, all four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) clear the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra hitting 74.6 FPS. This is the sweet spot for this combination, providing a fully playable experience at maximum quality.
At 2560x1440, the system also clears the threshold on all presets, but the margin is thinner. Ultra settings achieve 60.2 FPS, which is technically playable but leaves little headroom for demanding scenes. Users with 1440p monitors should consider High settings (67.9 FPS) for more stability.
At 3840x2160, the verdict is mixed. Only Low settings (71.4 FPS) are playable. Medium (53.1 FPS), High (43.3 FPS), and Ultra (38.6 FPS) all fall below the threshold. This system is not suitable for 4K gaming in Control unless the user is willing to significantly reduce visual quality.
The Ryzen 9 9950X3D's performance is never in question. Its 3DMark multi-thread score of 17184 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42018 are far beyond what Control requires. The RTX 4060 is the limiting factor, particularly at higher resolutions where memory bandwidth and pixel throughput become critical.
How This Combo Ranks
This combination ranks 2050 out of 3720 tested combos for Control. This percentile position—roughly the 55th percentile—places it in the lower-middle range of all tested systems. The ranking reflects the imbalance between the high-end CPU and mid-range GPU.
The CPU's percentile rank of 95 versus all CPUs indicates it is in the top 5% of processors. The GPU's percentile rank of 61 versus all GPUs places it in the upper-third of graphics cards. The combination's overall rank is dragged down by the GPU, which is expected given that Control is a visually demanding game that stresses the graphics subsystem more than the processor.
Compared to the nearest rival combos, the CPU's deltaPct of 0.1% to 0.4% from its rivals means that swapping the CPU for a Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 or Intel Core Ultra 9 285 would produce nearly identical results. The GPU's rivals show similar small deltas, but they are older architectures without the RTX 4060's feature set.
For users considering this build, the data suggests that the CPU is overkill for Control at 1080p or 1440p. A cheaper CPU would yield the same frame rates, as the GPU is the limiting factor. However, for users who play other CPU-intensive games or do productivity work, the Ryzen 9 9950X3D's performance is a future-proofing investment. The RTX 4060, while capable at 1080p and decent at 1440p, is the component that will need upgrading for 4K gaming.