Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Control
Action Adventure 2019

Control

74%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
118 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
65 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
89 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
49 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
60 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
33 FPS
13.3ms Frame Time
20ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,485
Your CPU 69,996
Graphics Card
Required 27,787
Your GPU 15,171

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 33 38 43 60
1440p QHD 49 56 64 89
1080p Full HD 65 75 84 118

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 75
1920x1080 Low 118
1920x1080 Medium 84
1920x1080 Ultra 65
2560x1440 High 56
2560x1440 Low 89
2560x1440 Medium 64
2560x1440 Ultra 49
3840x2160 High 38
3840x2160 Low 60
3840x2160 Medium 43
3840x2160 Ultra 33

Performance Analysis: Control on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and AMD Radeon RX 7600 pairing delivers a playable experience in Control, but the margin for error depends heavily on your target resolution. The data shows a system that can handle 1080p with all settings maxed out, while 1440p requires a compromise, and 4K is only viable at the lowest settings. This combination of an 8-core Zen 5 processor and a mid-range RDNA 3 GPU produces a balanced profile, though the GPU is clearly the limiting factor as resolution climbs.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the system clears the 60 FPS threshold with every preset tested. The Ultra preset produces an average of 65 FPS, making it the most demanding setting that remains playable. Since Ultra is the highest option available, this is the definitive best setting for Full HD—there is no reason to drop below it unless you have a high-refresh monitor that demands more headroom. High settings deliver 75 FPS average, Low hits 118 FPS, and Medium lands at 84 FPS, but the Ultra score of 65 FPS is sufficient for a smooth experience.

Moving to 2560x1440, the best playable setting is Medium, which produces an average of 64 FPS. This is a tight margin over the 60 FPS threshold, and the minimum FPS of 54 suggests occasional dips below that target. High settings drop to 56 FPS average, which falls short of the playable mark, while Ultra sits at 49 FPS. Low settings run at 89 FPS, but choosing Medium is the right call—it offers a substantial visual upgrade over Low while still averaging above 60 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the only playable option is Low, which averages exactly 60 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that stays at or above the target, but it is a razor-thin margin. Medium drops to 43 FPS average, High falls to 38 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 33 FPS. The data clearly indicates that 4K gaming with this combo requires sacrificing nearly all visual fidelity to maintain playable frame rates.

CPU and GPU Roles

The Ryzen 7 9700F is a high-end processor in general benchmarks, sitting in the 94th percentile of all CPUs and scoring 36,470 in passmark multithread. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X at 0.7% higher score and the Intel Core i7-14700KF at 0.2% lower, showing that the 9700F is competitive with much more expensive parts. This CPU is not the bottleneck in Control.

The RX 7600, by contrast, ranks in the 57th percentile of GPUs with a passmark g3d score of 16,634. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM at 0.2% higher score, placing it in the mid-range tier. The GPU is clearly the limiting factor as resolution increases.

The scaling data confirms this division of labor. At 1080p, the jump from Low to Ultra only drops the average FPS from 118 to 65, a 45% reduction. At 1440p, the same preset range goes from 89 to 49 FPS, a 45% reduction as well. But at 4K, the drop from Low to Ultra is far steeper: from 60 to 33 FPS, a 45% reduction again. The pattern is consistent—the GPU workload scales predictably with resolution, while the CPU has ample headroom.

The processor's single-thread score of 4,691 in passmark singlethread indicates strong per-core performance, which matters for Control's physics and AI systems. However, the fact that FPS scales almost linearly with resolution and preset suggests that the RX 7600's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 2,048 shading units are what determine the final frame rates. At 4K, the GPU simply runs out of bandwidth and compute capacity, regardless of how capable the CPU is.

Measured FPS Breakdown

1920x1080: Low settings produce an average of 118 FPS. Medium settings average 84 FPS, with a minimum of 71 and maximum of 97. High settings average 75 FPS. Ultra settings average 65 FPS. All presets remain above the 60 FPS playable threshold, with the minimum recorded FPS at Medium (71) still clearing the target.

2560x1440: Low settings average 89 FPS. Medium settings average 64 FPS, with a minimum of 54 and maximum of 73. High settings average 56 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. Ultra settings average 49 FPS. The only preset where the minimum FPS data is available (Medium, 54) shows that dips below 60 FPS are possible even when the average is above it.

3840x2160: Low settings average exactly 60 FPS. Medium settings average 43 FPS, with a minimum of 36 and maximum of 49. High settings average 38 FPS. Ultra settings average 33 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is 17 FPS, which is the largest single-preset jump at any resolution, indicating a steep scaling curve at 4K.

The data shows a consistent pattern: each resolution step up reduces average FPS by roughly 25-35% across comparable presets. For example, High at 1080p (75 FPS) drops to High at 1440p (56 FPS), a 25% reduction, then to High at 4K (38 FPS), a 32% further reduction. This is typical for a GPU-bound scenario where the RX 7600's 288.0 GB/s memory bandwidth becomes increasingly taxed at higher pixel counts.

The Verdict

This PC can run Control, but the playable envelope is narrower than the hardware specs might suggest. At 1920x1080, every preset from Low to Ultra clears the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra averaging 65 FPS. This is the resolution where the combo shines—you get the full visual experience without compromise.

At 2560x1440, the system is playable but only at Medium settings, which average 64 FPS. The minimum FPS of 54 at Medium means you will see occasional stutter, but the experience is acceptable. High settings at 56 FPS average are borderline and likely to feel inconsistent. If you own a 1440p monitor, plan to use Medium settings and accept some frame dips.

At 3840x2160, the system barely meets the playable threshold with Low settings averaging exactly 60 FPS. This is not a recommended configuration for 4K gaming—the visual quality at Low is significantly degraded, and there is no headroom for demanding scenes. The verdict is clear: 1080p is the sweet spot, 1440p is acceptable with settings compromises, and 4K is only technically playable.

The CPU's high benchmark percentile (94th) and the GPU's mid-range percentile (57th) confirm that this is a CPU-heavy system paired with a modest GPU. For Control specifically, the GPU is the deciding factor, and the data shows that the RX 7600 is adequate for 1080p Ultra and 1440p Medium, but nothing more demanding.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Control at 4K with high settings?

A: No. At 3840x2160 with High settings, the average FPS is 38, which is well below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Low settings are required for 4K playability, and they average exactly 60 FPS.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo?

A: 1920x1080 is the best resolution. At this setting, Ultra presets average 65 FPS, and all lower presets exceed 75 FPS. The system has no issues maintaining playable frame rates at Full HD.

Q: Does the Ryzen 7 9700F bottleneck the RX 7600 in Control?

A: The data does not indicate a CPU bottleneck. The 9700F scores in the 94th percentile of all CPUs with a passmark multithread score of 36,470. FPS scaling across resolutions follows GPU workload patterns, suggesting the RX 7600 is the limiting component.

Q: Is 60 FPS achievable at 1440p with Medium settings?

A: Yes, Medium settings at 2560x1440 average 64 FPS. However, the minimum FPS is 54, so there will be occasional dips below 60 FPS during intense scenes.

Q: How does the RX 7600 compare to its nearest GPU rival?

A: The RX 7600 has a passmark g3d score of 16,634, which is 0.2% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM (15,199). This places it in the 57th percentile of all GPUs.

Q: What is the highest preset that stays above 60 FPS at 1080p?

A: Ultra settings at 1920x1080 average 65 FPS, which is the highest preset tested and remains above the 60 FPS threshold. There is no higher setting available in the data.

How This Combo Ranks

This combination of AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and AMD Radeon RX 7600 ranks 2,608th out of 3,720 tested combos for Control, placing it in the lower portion of the benchmark database. This rank reflects the GPU's mid-range positioning (57th percentile) more than the CPU's high-end capabilities (94th percentile). The data shows that while the processor is competitive with parts like the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (0.7% higher score) and Intel Core i7-14700K (0.9% higher), the GPU holds the overall combo back.

The rank of 2,608 out of 3,720 means roughly 70% of tested systems perform better in Control. This is expected for a mid-range GPU pairing, as the RX 7600's 8 GB memory and 128-bit bus limit its performance at higher resolutions. The system is well-suited for 1080p gaming, where it beats the 60 FPS target at all presets, but it falls behind systems with more powerful GPUs at 1440p and 4K. For a builder focused on Full HD gaming with occasional 1440p at reduced settings, this combo is functional; for higher-resolution gaming, the data suggests looking at GPU upgrades before considering CPU changes.