Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Control
Action Adventure 2019

Control

86%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
147 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
80 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
114 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
62 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
74 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
41 FPS
10.8ms Frame Time
16ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,485
Your CPU 33,079
Graphics Card
Required 27,787
Your GPU 26,331

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 41 47 56 74
1440p QHD 62 73 79 114
1080p Full HD 80 93 102 147

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 93
1920x1080 Low 147
1920x1080 Medium 102
1920x1080 Ultra 80
2560x1440 High 73
2560x1440 Low 114
2560x1440 Medium 79
2560x1440 Ultra 62
3840x2160 High 47
3840x2160 Low 74
3840x2160 Medium 56
3840x2160 Ultra 41

Performance Analysis: Control on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 delivers a highly capable 1080p and 1440p experience in Control, but the data indicates that 4K gaming requires significant graphical compromises. Benchmark results show the combo is firmly playable at the two lower resolutions across all tested presets, while 4K Ultra falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this combination covers three resolutions and four quality presets, with all results representing average frame rates. At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates substantial headroom. The Low preset produces an average of 146.9 FPS, while Medium achieves 102.4 FPS. High settings yield 93.2 FPS, and the demanding Ultra preset still maintains a solid 79.6 FPS average. This progression shows a predictable scaling pattern, with the jump from Low to Ultra representing a 45.8% reduction in average frame rate.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance curve remains strong but tightens. Low settings deliver 114 FPS, which drops to 78.9 FPS on Medium. The High preset produces 72.5 FPS, while Ultra manages 61.7 FPS. The delta between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 45.9%, closely mirroring the percentage drop seen at 1080p. Notably, the step from Medium to High costs only 6.4 FPS, whereas the step from High to Ultra costs 10.8 FPS, indicating the Ultra preset carries a heavier rendering load.

At 3840x2160, the results reveal a clear boundary. The Low preset achieves 73.6 FPS, comfortably above the 60 FPS playable threshold. Medium drops to 56.2 FPS, High falls further to 46.8 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 40.6 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 4K represents a 44.8% performance loss, consistent with the other resolutions. However, the absolute values show that only the Low preset clears the playable threshold, and even that comes with a 22.7% margin above 60 FPS.

FAQ

*Q: Can this system run Control at 4K with playable frame rates?*

A: Yes, but only with the Low preset. The measured 4K Low average is 73.6 FPS, which exceeds the 60 FPS threshold. The Medium preset at 56.2 FPS, High at 46.8 FPS, and Ultra at 40.6 FPS all fall short of playable performance.

Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming?

A: The Ultra preset at 2560x1440 produces an average of 61.7 FPS, making it the most demanding settings option that still clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. All four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—are playable at this resolution.

Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 1440p?

A: The data shows varying losses depending on preset. Low drops from 146.9 FPS to 114 FPS (a 22.4% reduction), Medium from 102.4 FPS to 78.9 FPS (23.0%), High from 93.2 FPS to 72.5 FPS (22.2%), and Ultra from 79.6 FPS to 61.7 FPS (22.5%). The performance penalty is remarkably consistent across all presets.

Q: Is the Ryzen 7 7800X3D or the RTX 5060 the limiting factor at 4K?

A: The frame rate scaling across resolutions suggests the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck at 4K. The CPU's benchmark data shows strong multi-threaded performance (16,817 in Cinebench R23 multi-core), while the GPU's 4K Ultra result of 40.6 FPS indicates the rendering load exceeds what the RTX 5060 can sustain at high settings.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations?

A: The combination ranks 1,829th out of 3,720 tested combos for Control, placing it in the upper half of the database. This percentile position reflects strong overall performance, particularly given the 1080p and 1440p results.

Q: Does the Low preset at 1080p provide competitive esports-level frame rates?

A: The 146.9 FPS average at 1080p Low is the highest measured result for this combo. While this is well above the 60 FPS threshold, the data does not indicate whether this qualifies as competitive for esports, only that it represents the maximum performance available from this configuration.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance scaling across resolutions reveals the distinct roles of each component. At 1920x1080, the CPU's capabilities are more prominent, as the RTX 5060 has sufficient headroom to feed frames quickly. The 146.9 FPS Low result and 102.4 FPS Medium result indicate that the Ryzen 7 7800X3D can sustain high frame delivery without becoming a bottleneck. The CPU's 3DMark scores—7,980 for 16 threads and 959 for single-thread—support its ability to handle the game's physics and logic at high frame rates.

As resolution increases to 2560x1440, the balance shifts toward the GPU. The consistent 22-23% FPS drop across presets when moving from 1080p to 1440p suggests the GPU is now the limiting factor, as the additional pixel count increases rendering load proportionally. The CPU's role diminishes because frame rates remain high enough that per-frame CPU work is not exposed as a bottleneck.

At 3840x2160, the GPU's limitations become dominant. The 40.6 FPS Ultra result represents a 49.0% reduction from the 1440p Ultra figure, a much larger drop than the 22.5% seen from 1080p to 1440p. This indicates the GPU is severely constrained at 4K, while the CPU has ample headroom. The RTX 5060's 8 GB of GDDR7 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are likely insufficient for the texture and geometry demands of 4K Ultra, whereas the CPU's 96 MB of shared L3 cache and high single-thread performance (1,713 in Cinebench R23 single-core) remain more than adequate.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Based on the nearest rivals in the benchmark database, several other CPUs and GPUs would produce similar frame rates in Control. For the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G and Intel Core i7-13650HX both have average scores within 0% of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D (33,089 vs. 33,079). The AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX also matches with 33,091, while the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H trails by 0.4% with 33,201. These processors would likely yield nearly identical CPU-bound performance at 1080p.

On the GPU side, the AMD Radeon 860M and NVIDIA GeForce MX550 both show average scores within 0.3% of the RTX 5060 (26,401 and 26,421 vs. 26,331, respectively). The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary is 0.8% lower at 26,553, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is 1.2% higher at 26,011. These alternatives would deliver comparable GPU-bound performance, meaning the 4K results would be similar, though the exact frame rates could vary by a few FPS.

For a system builder seeking equivalent overall performance, pairing any of these rival CPUs with the RTX 5060 would produce similar results. Conversely, swapping the GPU for a Radeon RX 6750 XT would likely yield marginally higher frame rates, while the RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary would be slightly slower. The data does not include exact FPS for these rival combinations, so the comparisons are based on aggregate benchmark scores rather than direct Control measurements.

The Verdict

The data clearly indicates this PC can run Control at 1080p and 1440p with full visual fidelity. At 1920x1080, all four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—exceed the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra averaging 79.6 FPS. This provides a 32.7% margin above the playable threshold, making it the recommended resolution for the best visual experience without compromise.

At 2560x1440, the system also clears 60 FPS on every preset. The Ultra preset averages 61.7 FPS, which is only 2.8% above the threshold. This is playable but leaves little headroom for demanding scenes. The High preset at 72.5 FPS offers a more comfortable 20.8% margin while sacrificing minimal visual quality.

At 3840x2160, the system is limited to the Low preset for playable performance. The 73.6 FPS average on Low provides a 22.7% margin, but Medium (56.2 FPS), High (46.8 FPS), and Ultra (40.6 FPS) all fall below the 60 FPS threshold. Users prioritizing 4K should expect to run the game at Low settings or consider reducing resolution to 1440p for higher quality presets.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 combination ranks 1,829th out of 3,720 tested combos for Control, placing it in the 49.2nd percentile of all configurations. This position reflects a system that is above average but not top-tier, which aligns with the measured results: strong 1080p and 1440p performance, but clear limitations at 4K.

The ranking suggests that a significant number of tested combos—1,891 to be exact—deliver better performance in this game. However, the rank is heavily influenced by the 4K results, where the RTX 5060's 8 GB memory capacity and mid-range compute power (19.18 TFLOPS FP32) are insufficient for Ultra settings. At 1080p, the combo would likely rank much higher given the 146.9 FPS Low result, but the aggregate ranking weighs all resolutions equally.

Best Settings per Resolution

For 1920x1080, the Ultra preset at 79.6 FPS is the most demanding settings level that maintains playable performance. This provides a 32.7% buffer above the 60 FPS threshold, making it the clear choice for maximum visual quality at this resolution.

For 2560x1440, the Ultra preset at 61.7 FPS is technically playable, meeting the 60 FPS threshold with a slim 2.8% margin. However, for users who prefer a more stable experience, the High preset at 72.5 FPS offers a 20.8% margin with only a minor visual downgrade. The data supports Ultra as the best settings for raw performance, but High may be more practical for consistent frame delivery.

For 3840x2160, only the Low preset at 73.6 FPS clears the 60 FPS threshold. This is the sole playable option, and it represents the maximum visual quality achievable at 4K with this hardware. Users seeking higher quality at 4K would need to either accept sub-60 FPS performance or drop to a lower resolution.