Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Control
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 31 | 35 | 39 | 56 |
| 1440p QHD | 46 | 53 | 59 | 83 |
| 1080p Full HD | 63 | 69 | 84 | 115 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Control on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Intel Arc B580 combination delivers a playable Control experience at 1080p and 1440p, but fails to reach the 60 FPS threshold at 4K in any preset. At 1080p, the system clears 60 FPS even at Ultra settings, while 1440p requires dropping to Low for a comfortable margin. The data shows a clear performance ceiling at 4K, where even Low settings fall short of playability.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combination produces its strongest results. Low settings average 115.3 FPS, representing the highest frame rate recorded across all resolutions and presets. Medium settings average 83.5 FPS, High settings average 69.4 FPS, and Ultra settings average 63 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 52.3 FPS, indicating that the preset scaling has a substantial impact on performance at this resolution.
Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates drop noticeably. Low settings average 83.2 FPS, which remains well above the playable threshold. Medium settings average 59.3 FPS, just below the 60 FPS mark. High settings average 53.1 FPS, and Ultra settings average 46.4 FPS. The transition from 1080p to 1440p at Low settings costs 32.1 FPS, a reduction of roughly 28 percent. At Ultra settings, the same resolution step reduces performance from 63 FPS to 46.4 FPS, a 16.6 FPS loss.
At 3840x2160, the system struggles across all presets. Low settings average 56 FPS, the only 4K preset to approach playability. Medium settings average 38.9 FPS, High settings average 34.6 FPS, and Ultra settings average 31.4 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is 24.6 FPS, showing that the GPU becomes the limiting factor as resolution increases. The data indicates that no preset at 4K achieves the 60 FPS playable threshold, with even the best-case Low preset falling 4 FPS short.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark data reveals a shifting balance between CPU and GPU responsibilities depending on resolution. At 1080p, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D has enough headroom to let the Arc B580 stretch its legs, as evidenced by the 115.3 FPS result at Low settings. The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, paired with 96 MB of shared L3 cache, provide sufficient processing power to avoid bottlenecking the GPU at lower resolutions.
At 1440p, the GPU begins to assert more influence over the final frame rate. The scaling from 1080p Low (115.3 FPS) to 1440p Low (83.2 FPS) shows a 32.1 FPS drop, which aligns with the increased pixel count. The CPU's role diminishes as the GPU works harder to fill the additional pixels. This pattern continues at 4K, where even Low settings produce only 56 FPS, a 59.3 FPS reduction from 1080p Low. The Arc B580's 12 GB of GDDR6 memory and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient to maintain high frame rates at this resolution.
Preset scaling also highlights the GPU's dominance at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 52.3 FPS, suggesting the CPU can feed the GPU effectively across all presets. At 1440p, the same preset gap narrows to 36.8 FPS, and at 4K it narrows further to 24.6 FPS. This compression indicates that the GPU is increasingly saturated as resolution rises, with the CPU playing a smaller role in determining final performance.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that maintains 60 FPS or higher is Ultra, which averages 63 FPS. This is the optimal choice for visual quality at this resolution, as it provides a 3 FPS margin above the playable threshold. All four presets — Low at 115.3 FPS, Medium at 83.5 FPS, High at 69.4 FPS, and Ultra at 63 FPS — clear the 60 FPS mark, giving users full flexibility to prioritize frame rate or visual fidelity.
At 2560x1440, only Low settings achieve the playable threshold, averaging 83.2 FPS. Medium settings fall just short at 59.3 FPS, High settings average 53.1 FPS, and Ultra settings average 46.4 FPS. The recommendation is to run Low settings for a smooth experience, accepting reduced visual quality in exchange for a 23.2 FPS buffer above the minimum requirement.
At 3840x2160, no preset reaches 60 FPS. Low settings come closest at 56 FPS, followed by Medium at 38.9 FPS, High at 34.6 FPS, and Ultra at 31.4 FPS. The data indicates that 4K gaming is not viable with this combination, as even the least demanding preset fails to meet the playable threshold by 4 FPS.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination ranks 2854 out of 3720 tested combos in Control, placing it in the lower 23 percent of all configurations. This ranking reflects the Arc B580's position as a mid-range GPU rather than a high-end solution. The GPU's percentile versus all GPUs is 68, while the CPU's percentile versus all CPUs is 83, indicating that the processor is significantly stronger than the graphics card in this pairing.
The rank of 2854 suggests that most other tested combinations deliver better performance in Control. This is consistent with the 4K results, where the system fails to reach playable frame rates. The CPU's strong benchmark scores — including a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16817 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2426 — do not compensate for the GPU's limitations at higher resolutions. The data positions this combo as a 1080p-focused configuration, with marginal 1440p capability at reduced settings.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The GPU's nearest rivals provide context for its performance level. The AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP has an average score of 23061, a delta of -0.2 percent compared to the Arc B580's 23021 average. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 scores 22895, a 0.6 percent delta. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 scores 23172, a -0.7 percent delta, and the NVIDIA P106-100 scores 23249, a -1 percent delta. These figures indicate that the Arc B580 performs within a narrow band around these cards, with all deltas within 1 percent.
On the CPU side, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D's nearest rivals are closely matched. The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G and Intel Core i7-13650HX both score 33089, a 0 percent delta. The AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX scores 33091, also a 0 percent delta. The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H scores 33201, a -0.4 percent delta. These CPUs would produce virtually identical frame rates in Control when paired with the Arc B580, as the GPU remains the performance bottleneck.
The Verdict
This PC can run Control at 1920x1080 with all presets exceeding 60 FPS, making it fully playable at that resolution. The Ultra preset at 63 FPS is the recommended configuration, offering the highest visual quality while maintaining a playable frame rate. At 2560x1440, the system is playable only at Low settings, with an average of 83.2 FPS. Users who prioritize resolution over visual fidelity can use this configuration, but those seeking higher quality settings should consider reducing resolution to 1080p.
At 3840x2160, the system cannot run Control at playable frame rates under any preset. The best result is Low settings at 56 FPS, which falls 4 FPS short of the 60 FPS threshold. The verdict by resolution confirms this analysis: 1080p supports High, Low, Medium, and Ultra settings; 1440p supports only Low; and 4K supports no playable settings. The combination of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Arc B580 is a capable 1080p gaming setup for Control, with limited 1440p capability and no 4K viability.