Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Control
Action Adventure 2019

Control

77%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
101 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
55 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
76 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
42 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
51 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
28 FPS
15.9ms Frame Time
24ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,485
Your CPU 33,079
Graphics Card
Required 27,787
Your GPU 20,556

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 28 32 36 51
1440p QHD 42 48 54 76
1080p Full HD 55 63 71 101

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 63
1920x1080 Low 101
1920x1080 Medium 71
1920x1080 Ultra 55
2560x1440 High 48
2560x1440 Low 76
2560x1440 Medium 54
2560x1440 Ultra 42
3840x2160 High 32
3840x2160 Low 51
3840x2160 Medium 36
3840x2160 Ultra 28

Performance Analysis: Control on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D paired with the Intel Arc B570 delivers a sharply resolution-dependent experience in Control, with the benchmark data showing a clear ceiling at 1080p and a rapid falloff as pixel count climbs. At 1920x1080, the combination produces a solidly playable frame rate across most presets, but by 2560x1440 only the lowest settings remain viable, and at 3840x2160 no preset reaches the 60 FPS threshold. This is a pairing that favors esports-style responsiveness over high-fidelity 4K gaming, and the measured numbers quantify exactly where the line sits.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for Control with this hardware reveals a consistent pattern across all three tested resolutions. At 1920x1080, the average frame rates are 101 FPS on Low, 71 FPS on Medium, 63 FPS on High, and 55 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset shows a minimum of 61 FPS and a maximum of 82 FPS, indicating that even the lower bounds of performance stay comfortably above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The High preset averages 63 FPS, which is just barely playable, while Ultra dips to 55 FPS, falling short of the target.

Moving to 2560x1440, the averages drop substantially. Low settings yield 76 FPS, which is still well above the threshold, but Medium falls to 54 FPS with a minimum of 46 FPS and a maximum of 62 FPS. High averages 48 FPS, and Ultra averages 42 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium at this resolution is 22 FPS, a significant jump that suggests the Medium preset introduces a heavy GPU workload. The minimum frame rate of 46 FPS on Medium indicates noticeable stutters during demanding scenes, making it a risky choice for smooth gameplay.

At 3840x2160, the results are largely unplayable. Low settings average 51 FPS, which is close but still below 60. Medium averages 36 FPS with a minimum of 31 FPS and a maximum of 42 FPS. High averages 32 FPS, and Ultra averages 28 FPS. The drop from Low to Medium at 4K is 15 FPS, showing that even a single step up in visual quality cuts performance by nearly a third. The Ultra preset at 28 FPS is essentially a slideshow, and the data clearly indicates that 4K is not a viable option for this combo.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark results show a clear shift in bottleneck behavior depending on resolution. At 1920x1080, the CPU appears to be the limiting factor at lower settings, as the frame rates scale steeply from 101 FPS on Low to 71 FPS on Medium and 63 FPS on High. This 38 FPS drop between Low and High suggests that the GPU is being fed enough data to work hard, but the CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads are not the constraint. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D's strong single-thread performance, evidenced by its 3DMark single-thread score of 959, helps maintain high frame rates at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the GPU begins to take a more dominant role. The frame rate difference between Low and High is 28 FPS (76 vs 48), which is a smaller absolute drop than at 1080p but still significant. The GPU's 10 GB of GDDR6 memory and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth are being taxed more heavily, and the Arc B570's 11.52 TFLOPS FP32 throughput starts to show its limits. The scaling between 1080p and 1440p on the same preset — for example, High drops from 63 to 48 FPS — indicates a 24% performance penalty from the resolution increase alone.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is overwhelmingly the bottleneck. The frame rates across all presets are below 60 FPS, and the drop from Low (51 FPS) to Ultra (28 FPS) is a 45% reduction. This is a classic GPU-bound scenario where the Intel Arc B570's 160-bit memory bus and 80 ROPs are insufficient for the pixel throughput required at 4K. The CPU's role is negligible here, as even the Low preset cannot reach 60 FPS, meaning the GPU is the sole constraint.

FAQ

*Q: Can this PC run Control at 1920x1080 with High settings?*

A: Yes, the measured average FPS is 63 at 1080p High, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. The data shows no minimum FPS recorded for this preset, but the average suggests a stable experience.

Q: What is the best playable setting at 2560x1440?

A: The only preset that averages above 60 FPS is Low, with an average of 76 FPS. Medium averages 54 FPS, so it falls below the playable threshold.

Q: Is 4K playable with this hardware?

A: No. Even at Low settings, the average FPS is 51, which is below 60. The best average across all 4K presets is 51 FPS, so no setting achieves a playable frame rate.

Q: How does the GPU's memory bandwidth affect performance in this game?

A: The Intel Arc B570 has 380.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is a key factor at higher resolutions. The sharp FPS drops from 1080p to 1440p and then to 4K suggest that memory bandwidth is a limiting factor, particularly on Medium and High presets.

Q: What is the frame rate range on Medium settings at 1080p?

A: The average is 71 FPS, with a minimum of 61 FPS and a maximum of 82 FPS. This shows a tight range that stays above the 60 FPS threshold throughout.

Q: Does the CPU matter more at lower resolutions?

A: The data suggests yes. At 1080p, the frame rates are high (up to 101 FPS on Low), and the CPU's strong single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 959) helps drive these numbers. At 4K, the GPU is clearly the bottleneck, as even Low settings fail to hit 60 FPS.

The Verdict

The verdict is clear: this PC can run Control at 1920x1080 with High settings, averaging 63 FPS, and at 2560x1440 with Low settings, averaging 76 FPS. At 4K, no preset clears the 60 FPS threshold, with the best average being 51 FPS on Low. The data shows that 1080p is the sweet spot for this combination, offering playable frame rates up to High quality. At 1440p, the user must drop to Low settings to maintain smooth gameplay, while 4K is simply not viable. The measured results align with the verdict data, which lists 1080p High as the best playable setting and 1440p Low as the only playable option at that resolution.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the nearest rivals for the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D's average benchmark score of 33079 is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G (33089), the Intel Core i7-13650HX (33089), and the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (33091), all with a deltaPct of 0. The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H is slightly ahead at 33201, with a deltaPct of -0.4, meaning it is 0.4% faster. In practical terms, any of these CPUs would deliver near-identical frame rates in Control, as the game is not heavily CPU-bound at higher resolutions.

For the GPU, the Intel Arc B570's average benchmark score of 20556 is closely matched by the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20534, deltaPct 0.1), the Intel Arc A750 (20582, deltaPct -0.1), and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X (20662, deltaPct -0.5). The Quadro M4000M is slightly behind at 20480, with a deltaPct of 0.4. This means that swapping the Arc B570 for an RTX 3070 Mobile or an Arc A750 would produce very similar FPS numbers in Control, with differences of less than 1%. Users with these alternative GPUs should expect the same resolution-dependent behavior.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the best playable preset is High, which averages 63 FPS. This is the most demanding setting that stays at or above 60 FPS, as Ultra drops to 55 FPS. Medium also qualifies at 71 FPS, but High offers better visual quality while still meeting the threshold. At 2560x1440, the only playable preset is Low, with an average of 76 FPS. Medium falls short at 54 FPS, so Low is the sole option for maintaining smooth gameplay. At 3840x2160, no preset reaches 60 FPS, so there is no recommended setting. The closest is Low at 51 FPS, but it still fails the playability criterion.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D + Intel Arc B570 combination ranks 2995 out of 3720 tested combos in Control, placing it in the lower 20% of all configurations. This ranking reflects the GPU's limitations at higher resolutions, as the CPU is quite capable — the Ryzen 7 7800X3D ranks in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, while the Arc B570 sits in the 65th percentile among GPUs. The combo's overall rank is dragged down by the GPU's inability to handle 1440p and 4K workloads, despite the CPU's strong performance. For a game like Control that scales heavily with GPU power, this pairing is best suited for 1080p gaming, where the data shows it can deliver a smooth experience on High settings.