Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Control
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 42 | 44 | 52 | 72 |
| 1440p QHD | 57 | 65 | 74 | 106 |
| 1080p Full HD | 75 | 92 | 101 | 142 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Control on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 combination delivers a playable experience in Control at 1080p and 1440p, but 4K requires a significant settings compromise. At 1920x1080, the combo achieves 75 FPS on Ultra, making it fully capable of maxing out the game. At 2560x1440, High settings produce 65.1 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS threshold, while Ultra falls just short at 57.4 FPS. The 4K resolution is the weak point: only Low settings reach a playable 72.1 FPS, with Medium dropping to 52.1 FPS and High/Ultra falling below 45 FPS.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The benchmark data for Control shows a clear performance hierarchy across resolutions and presets. At 3840x2160, the average frame rates are tightly clustered and generally low. The Low preset delivers 72.1 FPS, which is the only 4K configuration that remains above the 60 FPS playability threshold. Medium drops to 52.1 FPS, a 20 FPS reduction from Low. High sits at 44.1 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 42.1 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is exactly 30 FPS, indicating that the visual fidelity upgrades at this resolution extract a heavy toll from the RTX 4060.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance picture improves substantially. The Low preset reaches 105.9 FPS, providing a comfortable margin for high-refresh-rate displays. Medium delivers 73.7 FPS, and High achieves 65.1 FPS. Ultra falls to 57.4 FPS, just 2.6 FPS below the 60 FPS threshold. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1440p is a 48.5 FPS drop, showing that the highest preset costs nearly half the Low preset's frame rate. Notably, the difference between High and Ultra at this resolution is only 7.7 FPS, suggesting that the Ultra preset's additional demands yield diminishing returns.
At 1920x1080, the combo shows its strongest performance. The Low preset produces 142.2 FPS, which is exceptionally smooth. Medium delivers 101.2 FPS, and High reaches 91.6 FPS. Ultra still maintains 75 FPS, comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold. The total spread from Low to Ultra at 1080p is 67.2 FPS, with the step from High to Ultra costing 16.6 FPS. This resolution is clearly where the RTX 4060 can stretch its legs, as even the most demanding preset leaves headroom for consistent frame pacing.
The minimum and maximum FPS values are not provided in the dataset, so the analysis relies on average frame rates. The average values alone indicate that the combo's performance is consistent enough at 1080p and 1440p to avoid major stutters, while the 4K results suggest a more strained experience where frame time spikes are more likely.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals that the GPU is the dominant constraint for this combo in Control, particularly at higher resolutions. The scaling between resolutions demonstrates this clearly. At 1920x1080, the Ryzen 7 7700X has ample headroom, as the RTX 4060 is the limiting factor for pushing frame rates. The 8-core, 16-thread processor with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz is more than sufficient for the game's logic and physics at this resolution, as evidenced by the high average FPS across all presets.
When moving from 1080p to 1440p, the average FPS drops by approximately 30-40% depending on the preset. For example, High settings fall from 91.6 FPS to 65.1 FPS, a 26.5 FPS reduction. This magnitude of decline is typical of a GPU-bound scenario, where the increased pixel count directly impacts the rendering workload. The CPU's role diminishes further at 4K, where the FPS drops are even more pronounced. Ultra settings go from 75 FPS at 1080p to 42.1 FPS at 4K, a 43.9% reduction, reinforcing that the RTX 4060's 8 GB of VRAM and 128-bit memory bus are the primary bottlenecks.
The settings presets also illustrate the GPU's dominance. At 1080p, moving from Low to Ultra costs 67.2 FPS, which is a massive swing that points to the GPU's shading units and texture units being fully utilized. The CPU's 32 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory support help maintain stable frame delivery, but the benchmark results indicate that the processor is not the limiting factor at any resolution. The Ryzen 7 7700X's single-thread performance, evidenced by its 3DMark single-thread score of 1090, is sufficient to keep up with the RTX 4060's output.
At 4K, the GPU's role becomes even more critical. The fact that Low settings at 4K (72.1 FPS) outperform Ultra at 1440p (57.4 FPS) shows that the resolution and preset combination matters more than raw CPU power. The data suggests that users aiming for 4K should focus on reducing graphical load rather than upgrading the processor, as the RTX 4060 is clearly the binding constraint.
Best Settings per Resolution
For 3840x2160, the only playable setting is Low, which achieves 72.1 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS at this resolution. Medium falls short at 52.1 FPS, so there is no room for visual upgrades without sacrificing smoothness. The 30 FPS gap between Low and Medium at 4K is steep, making Low the clear choice for 4K gaming on this hardware.
At 2560x1440, High settings deliver 65.1 FPS, which is the best playable option. This preset clears the 60 FPS threshold with a 5.1 FPS margin, providing a good balance between visual quality and performance. Ultra is not viable at 57.4 FPS, so users must accept High as the ceiling. Low and Medium are also playable at 105.9 FPS and 73.7 FPS respectively, but High offers the best visual experience without dropping below 60 FPS.
For 1920x1080, Ultra settings are fully playable at 75 FPS. This is the most demanding preset available, and the combo handles it with a 15 FPS margin above the threshold. High (91.6 FPS), Medium (101.2 FPS), and Low (142.2 FPS) are all also viable, but Ultra is the recommended choice for maximum fidelity. The data shows no reason to compromise at this resolution, as even the heaviest settings leave ample headroom.
The Verdict
This PC can run Control, but the experience varies sharply by resolution. At 1920x1080, the verdict is unequivocal: all four presets — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — clear the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra achieving 75 FPS. This is the optimal resolution for this combo, offering full visual fidelity without any performance concerns. At 2560x1440, the combo is also playable, but only up to High settings (65.1 FPS). Ultra misses the mark at 57.4 FPS, so users must choose between High quality and sub-60 FPS Ultra. At 3840x2160, the verdict is more limited: only Low settings (72.1 FPS) are playable. Medium, High, and Ultra all fall below 60 FPS, with the latter two sitting in the low-40s range, which is not a smooth experience for an action-adventure game.
The playable threshold is defined as 60 FPS, and the data shows that the combo can meet this at 1080p and 1440p with the right settings. For 4K, the RTX 4060's limitations are exposed, and users should expect to run the game at Low to maintain playability. The overall verdict is that this is a solid 1080p and 1440p machine for Control, but not a 4K-capable one.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Looking at the nearest rivals for the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X sits close to several other processors in average benchmark score. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is just 0.3% slower, making it a near-identical match for gaming workloads. The Intel Core 7 250H and AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 are both 0.5% slower, and the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H is 0.7% slower. These processors would deliver essentially the same frame rates in Control, as the CPU is not the bottleneck at any resolution tested.
For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060's nearest rivals are surprisingly older or integrated graphics. The AMD Radeon HD 7790 has an average score that is 0.2% higher, while the AMD Radeon 780M is 0.3% slower. The AMD Radeon Pro 560 is 0.5% slower, and the AMD Radeon Pro 460 is 0.7% slower. These deltas are minimal, meaning that in practice, these GPUs would produce nearly identical performance in Control. However, it is important to note that the RTX 4060's feature set, such as its RT cores and tensor cores, may provide additional benefits in games that support those technologies, but the raw frame rate data shows these rivals are closely matched.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 ranks 1997 out of 3720 tested combos for Control. This places it in the 46th percentile of all tested combinations, meaning it outperforms a slight majority of systems but sits below the median in terms of overall capability. This ranking reflects the GPU's mid-tier positioning — the RTX 4060 has a percentile rank of 61 among all GPUs, while the CPU ranks in the 85th percentile. The combo's overall rank is dragged down by the GPU, which is the limiting factor in this pairing.
In practical terms, this ranking means the combo is better than average for running Control, but it is not a high-end system. The data indicates that the Ryzen 7 7700X has significant headroom, as its benchmark scores (e.g., Cinebench R23 multi-core at 19088) are much stronger than what the RTX 4060 can leverage in this game. Users with this combo should prioritize GPU-bound settings adjustments, as upgrading the GPU would yield far more performance than upgrading the CPU. The 1997th rank out of 3720 combos is a solid mid-pack result, confirming that this system is a competent but not exceptional choice for Control.