Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Control
Action Adventure 2019

Control

80%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
101 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
55 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
76 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
42 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
51 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
28 FPS
15.9ms Frame Time
24ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,485
Your CPU 35,909
Graphics Card
Required 27,787
Your GPU 20,556

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 28 32 36 51
1440p QHD 42 48 54 76
1080p Full HD 55 63 71 101

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 63
1920x1080 Low 101
1920x1080 Medium 71
1920x1080 Ultra 55
2560x1440 High 48
2560x1440 Low 76
2560x1440 Medium 54
2560x1440 Ultra 42
3840x2160 High 32
3840x2160 Low 51
3840x2160 Medium 36
3840x2160 Ultra 28

Performance Analysis: Control on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X paired with the Intel Arc B570 delivers a highly variable experience in Control, one that hinges almost entirely on the resolution and quality preset chosen. Benchmark data shows a system capable of smooth, high-refresh gameplay at 1080p, but one that rapidly loses ground as pixel count climbs. The combination ranks in the 80th percentile of all tested combos for this title, yet the measured frame rates reveal a clear performance ceiling that directly contradicts its overall standing.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo demonstrates its strongest performance. With Low settings, the average frame rate reaches 101 FPS, providing a substantial headroom above the 60 FPS playability threshold. Moving to Medium settings, the average drops to 71 FPS, with a minimum of 61 FPS and a maximum of 82 FPS, indicating that even the lowest recorded frames stay playable. High settings are still viable, averaging 63 FPS, which just clears the 60 FPS line. However, the Ultra preset pushes the average down to 55 FPS, falling below the playable threshold and showing that the most demanding settings are too much for this hardware at 1080p.

Stepping up to 2560x1440 reveals a significant performance penalty. The Low preset averages 76 FPS, which is still comfortably playable, but the margin shrinks considerably. Medium settings average 54 FPS, with a minimum of 46 FPS and a maximum of 62 FPS, meaning the experience will frequently dip below 60 FPS. High settings drop to an average of 48 FPS, and Ultra falls to 42 FPS. The data clearly shows that only the lowest settings are viable at this resolution, with a steep drop-off occurring between Low and Medium.

At 3840x2160, the combo struggles to maintain playable frame rates across all presets. Low settings yield an average of 51 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target. Medium averages 36 FPS, with a minimum of 31 FPS and a maximum of 42 FPS. High settings average 32 FPS, and Ultra averages just 28 FPS. The data indicates that 4K gaming is not a realistic option for this hardware pairing, as even the lowest settings fail to hit the playable threshold.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance scaling across resolutions and presets points to the Intel Arc B570 as the primary bottleneck in this configuration. The Ryzen 7 7700X, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, provides ample processing power; its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 19088 and single-core score of 1987 suggest it is not the limiting factor in a game like Control. The dramatic frame rate drops when moving from 1080p to 1440p and then to 4K—where the average at High settings falls from 63 FPS to 48 FPS to 32 FPS—are classic signs of GPU-bound performance. The GPU's rendering workload increases exponentially with pixel count, and the Arc B570's capabilities are quickly exhausted.

The preset scaling further confirms this. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 46 FPS (from 101 to 55 FPS), a substantial gap that shows the GPU is heavily taxed by the graphical features enabled in higher presets. At 1440p, this gap narrows to 34 FPS (from 76 to 42 FPS), and at 4K it narrows to 23 FPS (from 51 to 28 FPS). This diminishing difference between presets at higher resolutions is a hallmark of a GPU that is already saturated; the extra work required by Ultra settings cannot be accommodated because the GPU is already at its limit. The CPU, meanwhile, is likely idle or underutilized, as it easily keeps up with the frame generation demands at all tested settings.

FAQ

*Q: Can this PC run Control at 60 FPS on a 1080p monitor?*

A: Yes, but only with specific settings. Benchmark results show the High preset averages 63 FPS, and the Medium preset averages 71 FPS with a minimum of 61 FPS. The Ultra preset falls short at 55 FPS.

Q: What is the best quality preset at 1440p that remains playable?

A: The data shows that only the Low preset is playable at 2560x1440, averaging 76 FPS. All other presets, including Medium at 54 FPS, fall below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: Is 4K gaming possible with this hardware combination?

A: No. At 3840x2160, even the Low preset averages only 51 FPS, which is below the playable threshold. The Ultra preset averages just 28 FPS, making the game unplayable at this resolution.

Q: How does the Arc B570's performance compare to its closest rival, the Intel Arc A750?

A: The Arc B570's average benchmark score is 20556, while the Arc A750 scores 20582. This represents a -0.1% delta, indicating the two GPUs perform nearly identically in synthetic benchmarks. The Ryzen 7 7700X, with an average score of 35909, is 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core 7 250H, which scores 35728.

*Q: Does the CPU or GPU limit performance in Control?*

A: The GPU is the clear limiting factor. The frame rates drop sharply with increasing resolution, which is a GPU-bound characteristic. The Ryzen 7 7700X's high multi-threaded and single-threaded benchmark scores suggest it is not the bottleneck.

Q: What is the minimum FPS at Medium settings and 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080 with Medium settings, the minimum recorded FPS is 61, with an average of 71 FPS and a maximum of 82 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X and Intel Arc B570 combination is ranked 2995 out of 3720 tested combos for Control. This places it in the 80th percentile of all configurations, which might suggest strong performance. However, the measured FPS data tells a more nuanced story. The high rank is likely influenced by the CPU's strong overall benchmark scores, which contribute to the combo's aggregate performance. The GPU, while ranking in the 65th percentile against all GPUs, is the weaker link. The rank of 2995 indicates that while this is not a bottom-tier setup, it is also far from the top. A significant number of other tested combinations—725 in total—perform better, which aligns with the fact that the combo cannot handle 4K and struggles at 1440p beyond Low settings. The rank reflects a system that is adequate for 1080p gaming but lacks the headroom for higher resolutions or maximum settings.

The Verdict

This PC can run Control, but its playability is strictly limited by resolution and settings. According to the verdict data, at 1920x1080, the playable settings are High, Low, and Medium, with the best playable setting being High at an average of 63 FPS. At 2560x1440, only Low is playable, averaging 76 FPS. There are no playable settings at 3840x2160. The system meets the 60 FPS threshold for 1080p gaming with high-quality visuals, and it can achieve smooth performance at 1440p only by sacrificing graphical fidelity to the lowest preset. For 4K, the hardware is simply not sufficient.

Best Settings per Resolution

For 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, which delivers an average of 63 FPS. While Low and Medium also clear the threshold, High offers the best visual quality while maintaining playability. For 2560x1440, the only preset that achieves the playable threshold is Low, with an average of 76 FPS. No playable options exist for 3840x2160, as even Low fails to reach 60 FPS.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the CPU and GPU provide insight into what similar hardware would perform like. The Ryzen 7 7700X has an average benchmark score of 35909. Its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845, scores 35802, a mere 0.3% difference. The Intel Core 7 250H scores 35728 (0.5% slower), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 scores 35719 (0.5% slower). These CPUs would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Control, assuming the same GPU is used.

On the GPU side, the Intel Arc B570 has an average score of 20556. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534, which is 0.1% slower. The Intel Arc A750 scores 20582, a -0.1% difference, meaning it is essentially a performance twin. The AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20662 (-0.5%), and the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20480 (0.4%). A system built with any of these GPUs alongside the 7700X would produce very similar results in Control, with the Arc A750 being the most direct equivalent. The data suggests that swapping the B570 for an A750 would not change the gaming experience in any meaningful way.