Control

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 combination ranks 1959 out of 3720 tested combos for Control, placing it in the 47th percentile of all hardware pairings tested for this title. This mid-pack position reflects a pairing where the GPU, which sits in the 61st percentile of all GPUs, is the more limiting factor for this game, while the CPU, in the 81st percentile of all CPUs, provides ample headroom. The data indicates a system that is capable of delivering smooth frame rates at mainstream resolutions, but which requires careful settings management at higher resolutions to maintain playability.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s rank of 1959 out of 3720 tested combinations places it slightly below the median of all tested systems for Control. This is a telling statistic, as it suggests that while the individual components are solid mid-range performers, the combination does not push into the upper echelon of gaming performance for this specific title. The RTX 4060’s 61st percentile ranking among all GPUs indicates it is a competent but not top-tier graphics card, and Control’s demands at higher resolutions and presets expose this limitation.

In practical terms, the ranking means that a significant portion of tested combinations—roughly 47%—deliver better performance in Control. However, the data also shows that this combo comfortably handles the game at 1080p across all presets and at 1440p with medium-to-high settings. The rank is not a verdict on playability but rather a measure of raw performance headroom compared to other systems. A higher rank would indicate a system that could max out the game with ease, while this one requires a more selective approach to settings at higher resolutions.

The gap between the CPU’s high percentile (81) and the GPU’s more modest percentile (61) is a key takeaway. This imbalance suggests that the processor is not the bottleneck in most scenarios, and that upgrading the graphics card would yield more significant performance gains than upgrading the CPU. The benchmark data for the CPU, including a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23794 and a PassMark multithread score of 28053, illustrates a processor with substantial compute capability that is unlikely to hinder gameplay in Control.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Control at 4K resolution?

A: Yes, but only at Low settings, where it achieves an average of 72.4 FPS. At Medium settings, the average drops to 51.3 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playability threshold. High (43.5 FPS) and Ultra (41.5 FPS) are not playable at 4K.

Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming?

A: High settings at 2560x1440 produce an average of 68.2 FPS, making it the most demanding preset that remains at or above 60 FPS. Ultra settings at this resolution drop to 56.9 FPS, which is below the playable threshold.

Q: How does the RTX 4060 compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon 780M?

A: The RTX 4060 has an average benchmark score of 17639, which is 0.3% higher than the Radeon 780M’s score of 17588. This indicates nearly identical overall GPU performance, though the delta is negligible in real-world gaming.

Q: Is the Ryzen 7 5800XT a bottleneck for the RTX 4060 in Control?

A: No, the data indicates the CPU is not a limiting factor. The CPU’s 81st percentile ranking and strong multicore scores (Cinebench R23 multicore of 23794) suggest it has ample headroom. The GPU’s lower 61st percentile ranking means it is the primary constraint on frame rates.

Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1080p with Ultra settings?

A: The combination achieves an average of 75.9 FPS at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, which is above the 60 FPS playability threshold. This makes Ultra the recommended preset for 1080p.

Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 1440p at High settings?

A: At High settings, the average frame rate drops from 91.1 FPS at 1080p to 68.2 FPS at 1440p, a decrease of 22.9 FPS. This 25% reduction illustrates the scaling cost of increased resolution with this GPU.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data reveals a clear division of labor between the Ryzen 7 5800XT and the RTX 4060 in Control. At 1920x1080, the system shows strong performance across all presets, with the lowest average being 75.9 FPS at Ultra and the highest being 140.2 FPS at Low. This wide range—from 75.9 to 140.2 FPS—indicates that the GPU is the primary driver of performance, as the CPU has sufficient headroom to feed the graphics card at this resolution. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p shows a 64.3 FPS drop, which is a substantial reduction that can only be attributed to GPU workload.

Moving to 2560x1440, the pattern continues but with more strain on the GPU. The average frame rates range from 107.6 FPS at Low to 56.9 FPS at Ultra. The drop from Low to Ultra is 50.7 FPS, which is slightly less than at 1080p in absolute terms but represents a larger percentage decrease. At this resolution, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor, as the CPU’s role remains constant regardless of resolution. The fact that Low settings at 1440p (107.6 FPS) beat High settings at 1080p (91.1 FPS) suggests that the GPU has enough raw power to handle the higher resolution when visual effects are reduced.

At 3840x2160, the GPU’s limitations become starkly apparent. The average frame rates range from 72.4 FPS at Low to 41.5 FPS at Ultra. The 30.9 FPS difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is smaller than at lower resolutions, indicating that the GPU is hitting a performance ceiling where even reducing settings yields diminishing returns. The CPU’s role at 4K is minimal; the data shows that the processor’s compute capabilities, as evidenced by its 3DMark 16-thread score of 7683, are more than sufficient for the game’s logic and physics at any resolution.

The scaling between resolutions at the same preset further illustrates this point. At High settings, the frame rate drops from 91.1 FPS at 1080p to 68.2 FPS at 1440p (a 22.9 FPS drop) and then to 43.5 FPS at 4K (a 24.7 FPS drop from 1440p). This consistent degradation with resolution increase confirms that the GPU is the dominant factor in determining performance, with the CPU maintaining a stable baseline throughout.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the nearest rivals to the Ryzen 7 5800XT are the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H, the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, the AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, and the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X. The 7840H has an average benchmark score of 29868, which is 0% different from the 5800XT’s score of 29879. This means that in terms of overall CPU performance, the two are virtually identical. The 8845HS and 7840HS both have scores of 29955, which is 0.3% higher than the 5800XT, making them marginally faster. The Ryzen 5 9600X has a score of 29713, which is 0.6% lower. For gaming in Control, any of these CPUs would deliver nearly indistinguishable frame rates, as the game is not heavily CPU-bound with this class of processor.

On the GPU side, the nearest rivals to the RTX 4060 are the AMD Radeon HD 7790, the AMD Radeon 780M, the AMD Radeon Pro 560, and the AMD Radeon Pro 460. The HD 7790 has an average score of 17666, which is 0.2% higher than the RTX 4060’s 17639. The Radeon 780M scores 17588, which is 0.3% lower. The Radeon Pro 560 scores 17551 (0.5% lower), and the Radeon Pro 460 scores 17509 (0.7% lower). These deltas are all within a single percentage point, meaning that in Control, the RTX 4060 and these AMD alternatives would produce nearly identical frame rates at the same settings. This is surprising given the architectural differences, but the benchmark data consistently places them in the same performance tier.

For a user considering alternatives, the data suggests that swapping the Ryzen 7 5800XT for a Ryzen 7 7840H or 8845HS would yield no measurable change in Control’s frame rates. Similarly, replacing the RTX 4060 with a Radeon 780M would result in a performance change of less than 1%, which is imperceptible in practice. The practical implication is that this combo’s performance profile is well-established within its performance tier, and nearby hardware would behave in a highly similar manner.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system delivers its strongest performance. With Low settings, the average frame rate is 140.2 FPS. Moving to Medium, the average drops to 102.8 FPS, a reduction of 37.4 FPS. High settings produce 91.1 FPS, and Ultra settings yield 75.9 FPS. All four presets at 1080p clear the 60 FPS playability threshold, with even the most demanding preset providing a 15.9 FPS margin above the threshold.

At 2560x1440, the performance scales down as expected. Low settings produce an average of 107.6 FPS, which is 32.6 FPS lower than at 1080p. Medium settings average 77 FPS, a 25.8 FPS drop from 1080p. High settings average 68.2 FPS, which is 22.9 FPS lower than at 1080p. Ultra settings drop to 56.9 FPS, which is 19 FPS lower than at 1080p and falls below the 60 FPS threshold. The 1440p results show that three of the four presets remain playable, with Ultra being the exception.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is heavily taxed. Low settings average 72.4 FPS, which is still above the playability threshold. Medium settings drop to 51.3 FPS, a 21.1 FPS reduction from Low. High settings average 43.5 FPS, and Ultra settings produce 41.5 FPS. Only Low settings at 4K remain playable, and the margin above 60 FPS is 12.4 FPS. The difference between High and Ultra at 4K is just 2 FPS, indicating that the GPU has reached its performance limits at this resolution.

The overall pattern shows a consistent decrease in frame rates as both resolution and settings increase. The largest single drop occurs between Low and Medium at 1080p (37.4 FPS), while the smallest drop is between High and Ultra at 4K (2 FPS). This suggests that at lower resolutions, settings have a more pronounced effect on performance, while at higher resolutions, the GPU becomes the limiting factor regardless of settings.

The Verdict

The verdict for this system is clear: it can run Control at playable frame rates in most scenarios, but with important caveats at higher resolutions. At 1920x1080, all four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—achieve average frame rates above 60 FPS. The highest preset, Ultra, delivers 75.9 FPS, which is comfortably above the threshold. This makes 1080p the ideal resolution for this combo, allowing users to max out the game’s settings without concern.

At 2560x1440, three of the four presets remain playable. High settings produce 68.2 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold, and Low (107.6 FPS) and Medium (77 FPS) are also playable. Ultra settings at 1440p drop to 56.9 FPS, which is below the playable threshold. This means that 1440p users can enjoy the game at High settings, but should avoid Ultra for a consistent 60+ FPS experience.

At 3840x2160, only Low settings achieve a playable frame rate, with an average of 72.4 FPS. Medium (51.3 FPS), High (43.5 FPS), and Ultra (41.5 FPS) all fall below the 60 FPS threshold. This makes 4K gaming possible only with significant visual compromises. The data shows that the RTX 4060 lacks the raw power to handle Control at 4K with higher presets, and users seeking 4K at higher settings would need a more powerful GPU.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which achieves an average of 75.9 FPS. This is the recommended choice for 1080p, as it provides the best visual quality while maintaining a comfortable margin above the playability threshold. The data shows that there is no need to compromise on settings at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the best settings are High, which produce an average of 68.2 FPS. This preset offers a good balance between visual fidelity and performance. While Ultra is more demanding visually, it drops to 56.9 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target. High settings provide an 8.2 FPS margin above the threshold, making it the highest-quality option that remains playable.

At 3840x2160, the only playable preset is Low, which averages 72.4 FPS. Medium settings at 51.3 FPS fall short of the 60 FPS threshold, so users must accept Low settings for a playable experience at 4K. The 72.4 FPS average at Low provides a 12.4 FPS buffer, but the visual quality will be noticeably reduced compared to lower resolutions. For users prioritizing frame rate over detail, this is the only viable option at 4K.