Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Control
Action Adventure 2019

Control

79%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
148 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
81 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
115 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
61 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
78 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
42 FPS
10.5ms Frame Time
16ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,485
Your CPU 27,896
Graphics Card
Required 27,787
Your GPU 26,331

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 42 47 57 78
1440p QHD 61 70 82 115
1080p Full HD 81 95 108 148

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 95
1920x1080 Low 148
1920x1080 Medium 108
1920x1080 Ultra 81
2560x1440 High 70
2560x1440 Low 115
2560x1440 Medium 82
2560x1440 Ultra 61
3840x2160 High 47
3840x2160 Low 78
3840x2160 Medium 57
3840x2160 Ultra 42

Performance Analysis: Control on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 delivers a strong performance profile in Control, with benchmark results showing clear resolution scaling and a definitive playability threshold at 60 FPS. The data indicates that this combination is capable of high refresh rate gameplay at mainstream resolutions, while 4K requires a significant reduction in visual fidelity to maintain smooth frame rates.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this combination provides a complete picture across three resolutions and four quality presets. All figures represent average FPS, as the data set does not include minimum or maximum frame time values.

At 3840x2160 (4K), the results show a clear hierarchy based on settings. The Low preset delivers an average of 77.6 FPS, which is the only playable setting at this resolution. Medium drops to 56.9 FPS, High falls further to 47 FPS, and the Ultra preset bottoms out at 41.8 FPS. The spread between Low and Ultra is 35.8 FPS, indicating that the GPU is the primary constraint at 4K, with each step up in quality costing a significant chunk of performance.

At 2560x1440 (1440p), the situation improves dramatically. The Low preset achieves 114.6 FPS, Medium reaches 81.5 FPS, High holds at 70.4 FPS, and Ultra manages 60.9 FPS. All four settings clear the 60 FPS playability threshold, with Ultra barely crossing it. The delta between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 53.7 FPS, showing that the scaling penalty for maximum quality is substantial but not prohibitive.

At 1920x1080 (1080p), the combo shows its strongest performance. Low produces 148.2 FPS, Medium yields 107.5 FPS, High delivers 94.9 FPS, and Ultra still manages 80.5 FPS. Every preset at 1080p is comfortably above 60 FPS, with even the most demanding setting leaving nearly 20.5 FPS of headroom. The gap between Low and Ultra here is 67.7 FPS, the largest absolute spread across all resolutions, which suggests that the CPU overhead is less of a factor at this resolution.

CPU and GPU Roles

The scaling patterns across resolutions and presets reveal a clear division of labor between the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060. At 4K, the GPU is unequivocally the bottleneck. The drop from 77.6 FPS at Low to 41.8 FPS at Ultra represents a 46% performance reduction, which is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario where shading complexity and memory bandwidth dominate. The RTX 5060's 8 GB of GDDR7 memory and 128-bit bus are likely contributing factors, though the data does not specify per-setting memory usage.

At 1440p, the balance shifts. The 114.6 FPS at Low versus 60.9 FPS at Ultra indicates that the GPU still carries the bulk of the workload, but the CPU's 8-core, 16-thread configuration with 96 MB of L3 cache is starting to show its capability. The Ryzen 7 5800X3D's high single-thread performance, evidenced by its 3dmark_single_thread score of 884, ensures that frame delivery remains consistent even as the GPU load increases.

At 1080p, the CPU becomes a more prominent factor. The 148.2 FPS Low result and 80.5 FPS Ultra result suggest that the RTX 5060 is capable of feeding frames faster than the CPU can process at lower settings. The Ryzen 7 5800X3D's passmark_single_thread score of 3234 and cinebench_r23_singlecore score of 1452 indicate strong per-core performance, which helps maintain high average FPS, but the diminishing returns from Low to Medium at 1080p (a 40.7 FPS drop) versus the smaller relative drop at 4K (a 20.7 FPS drop from Low to Medium) point to the GPU becoming less saturated as resolution decreases.

The resolution scaling itself tells the story. Moving from 1080p to 1440p at the same preset costs roughly 23-33% of the frame rate (e.g., 94.9 FPS to 70.4 FPS at High, a 25.8% reduction). Moving from 1440p to 4K costs an additional 33-35% (e.g., 70.4 FPS to 47 FPS at High). This non-linear scaling is typical of a GPU with a 128-bit memory interface, where bandwidth limitations become more pronounced at higher pixel counts.

How This Combo Ranks

In the broader benchmark database, this specific CPU-GPU combination ranks 1652 out of 3720 tested combos for Control. This places it in the top 44.4% of all configurations tested, which is a respectable position considering the RTX 5060 is a mid-range GPU and the Ryzen 7 5800X3D is a last-generation processor.

The CPU's percentileVsAllCpus of 80 indicates that the Ryzen 7 5800X3D outperforms 80% of all CPUs in the database on average benchmark scores. Its avgBenchmarkScore of 27896 is nearly identical to its nearest rivals, including the AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (deltaPct 0) and the Intel Core i9-10900K (deltaPct 0.1). This suggests that the CPU is not a limiting factor in most gaming scenarios.

The GPU's percentileVsAllGpus of 72 positions the RTX 5060 above 72% of all GPUs tested. Its avgBenchmarkScore of 26331 places it in close competition with the AMD Radeon 860M (deltaPct -0.3) and the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (deltaPct -0.3), though these rivals are likely in different market segments. The RTX 5060's performance in Control specifically appears stronger than its aggregate benchmark percentile might suggest, given that it achieves playable frame rates at 1440p Ultra.

The Verdict

Based on the measured data, this PC can run Control at playable frame rates across most configurations, with the 60 FPS threshold serving as the benchmark for smooth gameplay. The verdict by resolution is clear and unambiguous.

At 3840x2160, only the Low preset is playable, achieving 77.6 FPS average. The Medium preset at 56.9 FPS and High at 47 FPS fall short of the 60 FPS target, and Ultra at 41.8 FPS is not viable for smooth play. Users with 4K displays must accept significant visual compromises.

At 2560x1440, all four presets clear the threshold. High delivers 70.4 FPS, Medium provides 81.5 FPS, Low reaches 114.6 FPS, and Ultra just barely hits 60.9 FPS. This resolution offers the best balance of visual quality and performance, with Ultra being playable but with minimal headroom.

At 1920x1080, the system excels. Ultra runs at 80.5 FPS, High at 94.9 FPS, Medium at 107.5 FPS, and Low at 148.2 FPS. Every setting provides a comfortable margin above 60 FPS, making 1080p the resolution where this combo truly shines for high-refresh-rate monitors.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For users considering this configuration, the nearest rivals in the database provide context for expected performance. On the CPU side, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D's avgBenchmarkScore of 27896 is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (deltaPct 0), the Intel Core i9-10900K (deltaPct 0.1), and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 (deltaPct -0.1). The Intel Core i5-12600KF is marginally slower with a deltaPct of 0.3. Any of these CPUs would produce very similar frame rates in Control, assuming the same GPU.

On the GPU side, the RTX 5060's avgBenchmarkScore of 26331 is closely matched by the AMD Radeon 860M (deltaPct -0.3) and the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (deltaPct -0.3), though these are likely integrated or entry-level discrete GPUs. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary is slightly faster (deltaPct -0.8), while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is marginally slower (deltaPct 1.2). Users with any of these GPUs should expect similar FPS ranges in Control at equivalent settings.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Control at 4K with playable frame rates?

A: Yes, but only at the Low preset, which achieves an average of 77.6 FPS. The Medium preset at 56.9 FPS, High at 47 FPS, and Ultra at 41.8 FPS all fall below the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Q: What is the best settings preset at 1440p for this combo?

A: The Ultra preset is playable at 60.9 FPS, making it the best visual option that still clears the 60 FPS threshold. However, this leaves minimal headroom for frame drops.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 5800X3D compare to other CPUs in this system's performance class?

A: The Ryzen 7 5800X3D's avgBenchmarkScore of 27896 is within 0.3% of the AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Intel Core i9-10900K, and AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340, making these CPUs effectively interchangeable for gaming performance.

Q: Is the RTX 5060 a bottleneck at 1080p?

A: The data suggests the CPU becomes more relevant at 1080p, as the 148.2 FPS Low result shows the GPU can output very high frame rates, but the CPU's processing limits may prevent even higher results. The Ryzen 7 5800X3D's passmark_single_thread score of 3234 supports strong per-core performance.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: The difference is 53.7 FPS, with Low at 114.6 FPS and Ultra at 60.9 FPS. This represents a 46.8% reduction in average FPS for maximum visual quality.

Q: Does this combo rank highly among all tested configurations?

A: It ranks 1652 out of 3720 combos for Control, placing it in the top 44.4%. The CPU is in the 80th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs.

Best Settings per Resolution

The optimal preset for each resolution is the most demanding setting that maintains an average FPS at or above 60 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the Low preset is the only playable option, delivering 77.6 FPS average. While this is above the threshold, the margin is moderate, and users seeking higher visual fidelity would need to consider reducing resolution.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset achieves 60.9 FPS, which just meets the playability threshold. This provides the full visual experience with only 0.9 FPS of headroom, so users with variable refresh rate monitors may prefer the High preset at 70.4 FPS for a more stable experience.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset runs at 80.5 FPS, offering substantial headroom above the 60 FPS threshold. This is the recommended configuration for the best balance of visual quality and performance, with 20.5 FPS of buffer to accommodate demanding scenes.