Control

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 combination delivers a dominant performance in Control, placing this pairing in the 91st percentile of all tested combos for the game. With a rank of 336 out of 3,720 tested configurations, this system sits firmly in the upper echelon of gaming hardware, outclassing the vast majority of alternatives. The benchmark data confirms that this pairing is not merely capable of running the game, but rather obliterates the 60 FPS playability threshold at every resolution and preset tested, making it an exceptional choice for high-refresh-rate and high-resolution gameplay.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank of 336 out of 3,720 tested combinations places it in the top 9% of all configurations evaluated for Control. This is a stellar result, indicating that the pairing of the Ryzen 7 5800X3D with the RTX 4080 is exceptionally well-suited for this title. The data suggests that this system will provide a buttery-smooth experience without requiring any compromises in visual fidelity.

Looking at the individual components, the RTX 4080 sits in the 86th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 54,247. Its nearest rival, the RTX 4080 SUPER, scores 54,209, putting the two cards within 0.1% of each other, effectively making them performance equals in synthetic tests. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB trails with a score of 55,698, which is 2.6% behind the RTX 4080, while the AMD Radeon 8060S is 2.7% behind with a score of 55,757. This places the RTX 4080 in a highly competitive position, just behind the top-tier cards in its class.

On the CPU side, the Ryzen 7 5800X3D achieves an 80th percentile ranking among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 27,896. Its nearest rivals are closely matched: the AMD Ryzen 7 6800U scores 27,887 (0% difference), the Intel Core i9-10900K scores 27,872 (0.1% behind), and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 scores 27,932 (0.1% ahead). The Intel Core i5-12600KF is 0.3% behind with a score of 27,799. These margins are negligible, indicating that the 5800X3D's CPU performance is competitive with, but not decisively ahead of, several modern alternatives. However, in Control, the game's engine appears to leverage the CPU's strengths effectively, as evidenced by the high combo ranking.

The synergy between these two components is clear. The RTX 4080's raw graphics horsepower, combined with the 5800X3D's strong multi-threaded and single-threaded capabilities, ensures that neither component becomes a significant bottleneck in this title. The result is a system that consistently delivers high frame rates, even at demanding 4K resolutions with maximum settings.

FAQ

*Q: Can this PC run Control at 4K resolution with maximum settings?*

A: Yes, it can. The benchmark data shows an average of 69 FPS at 3840x2160 resolution with Ultra settings, which is above the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Q: What is the best setting to use at 1440p for the highest visual quality while maintaining smooth gameplay?

A: At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset is the best choice, delivering an average of 102 FPS. This is well above the 60 FPS threshold, allowing for maximum visual fidelity without sacrificing performance.

Q: How much performance difference is there between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: The difference is significant. At 1920x1080, the Low preset averages 216 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 135 FPS. This represents a 60% performance drop when moving from the lowest to the highest settings, but both are far above the playability threshold.

Q: Is the RTX 4080 significantly faster than its direct competitor, the RTX 4080 SUPER, in synthetic benchmarks?

A: No, the difference is minimal. The RTX 4080 scores 54,247 on average, while the RTX 4080 SUPER scores 54,209, a delta of only 0.1%. In practical terms, they perform nearly identically in synthetic tests.

Q: Does the CPU hold back the GPU in this game?

A: The data suggests not. The combo ranks in the 91st percentile, and the CPU's benchmark scores are competitive with its nearest rivals. The system achieves very high frame rates at all resolutions, indicating that the CPU is providing adequate support to the GPU.

Q: What is the average FPS at 1440p with Medium settings?

A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the system achieves an average of 132 FPS, with a minimum of 113 FPS and a maximum of 152 FPS, providing a consistently smooth experience.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark results reveal a clear shift in workload between the CPU and GPU as resolution changes. At 1920x1080, the system is heavily GPU-bound, with the CPU's capabilities being less critical to overall performance. The data shows a massive leap from 135 FPS at Ultra to 216 FPS at Low settings, a 60% increase, indicating that the GPU is the primary limiter even at lower settings. The CPU, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, is more than sufficient to feed the RTX 4080 at this resolution, as evidenced by the high frame rates across all presets.

Moving to 2560x1440, the GPU's workload increases, but the system remains capable of delivering exceptional performance. The average frame rates range from 186 FPS at Low to 102 FPS at Ultra. The scaling between presets is more moderate than at 1080p, suggesting that the GPU is becoming a more significant factor, but the CPU still has ample headroom to avoid becoming a bottleneck. The 5800X3D's large 96 MB L3 cache likely helps maintain consistent frame pacing in this action-adventure title.

At 3840x2160, the GPU's role becomes paramount. The frame rates drop to between 126 FPS at Low and 69 FPS at Ultra. The gap between Low and Ultra settings narrows to 45%, indicating that the GPU is now the dominant constraint. The CPU's performance is less impactful at this resolution, as the sheer pixel count places an immense load on the RTX 4080's 9,728 shading units. The data shows that the 5800X3D is more than capable of keeping up with the GPU's demands, as even at 4K Ultra, the system maintains an average of 69 FPS, confirming that the CPU is not a limiting factor.

The scaling between resolutions highlights the balanced nature of this combo. From 1080p to 1440p, the average FPS across all settings drops by approximately 25-30%, and from 1440p to 4K, it drops by another 30-35%. This consistent scaling indicates that the system's performance is predictable and well-balanced, with no sudden bottlenecks emerging as resolution increases.

The Verdict

This PC can absolutely run Control, and it does so with exceptional headroom. The benchmark data confirms that all four tested presets — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — are playable at every resolution tested. The verdict by resolution is unequivocal: at 3840x2160, the system achieves 69 FPS at Ultra settings, which clears the 60 FPS threshold. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset delivers 102 FPS, and at 1920x1080, it reaches 135 FPS. This means that users can play the game at maximum visual fidelity at all resolutions without ever dropping below the playability threshold.

The lowest recorded performance across all tests is 69 FPS at 4K Ultra, which is still comfortably above the 60 FPS target. For gamers seeking the highest possible frame rates, the system can push well beyond 200 FPS at 1080p with Low settings, making it suitable for high-refresh-rate monitors. The data indicates that this combination is not just playable, but it excels in every scenario, offering a premium gaming experience with no compromises. Whether you prioritize visual quality or raw performance, this system delivers.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system delivers outstanding performance across all settings. The Low preset produces an average of 216 FPS, while the Medium preset averages 175 FPS, with a minimum of 149 FPS and a maximum of 201 FPS. The High preset achieves 156 FPS on average, and the Ultra preset maintains an average of 135 FPS. All presets are far above the 60 FPS threshold, ensuring a highly responsive and smooth experience.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance remains exceptional. The Low preset averages 186 FPS, while the Medium preset delivers 132 FPS on average, with a minimum of 113 FPS and a maximum of 152 FPS. The High preset reaches 118 FPS, and the Ultra preset still manages an average of 102 FPS. The minimum frame rates at Medium settings indicate that even in demanding scenes, the system stays well above the playability threshold.

At 3840x2160, the system continues to impress. The Low preset averages 126 FPS, while the Medium preset delivers 89 FPS on average, with a minimum of 76 FPS and a maximum of 103 FPS. The High preset achieves 79 FPS, and the Ultra preset maintains an average of 69 FPS. Even at 4K with maximum settings, the system never dips below 69 FPS on average, confirming its ability to handle the most demanding scenarios.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the best choice, delivering an average of 135 FPS. This setting provides the highest visual quality while maintaining a frame rate that is more than double the 60 FPS threshold, making it ideal for high-refresh-rate displays.

For 2560x1440, the Ultra preset is again recommended, with an average of 102 FPS. This allows gamers to experience the game at its highest visual fidelity while still enjoying a smooth and responsive experience, comfortably above the playability threshold.

At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset remains the optimal setting, achieving an average of 69 FPS. While this is the lowest average frame rate recorded in the test suite, it still clears the 60 FPS threshold, ensuring that 4K gaming at maximum settings is fully playable. For those who desire even higher frame rates at 4K, the High preset offers 79 FPS, but the Ultra preset provides the best balance of visual quality and performance, given that it remains above the playability threshold.