Control

Control is a demanding action-adventure title, and the pairing of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 produces a surprisingly capable, though resolution-sensitive, experience. Benchmark data for this combination shows a system that can comfortably handle high-refresh 1080p gaming, remains smooth at 1440p with maximum settings, but requires careful preset selection at 4K to maintain playability. The measured results are based on actual in-game testing, and the following analysis breaks down exactly where this combo excels and where it hits its limits.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the extensive benchmark database, this specific CPU-GPU pairing ranks 1665th out of 3720 tested combos for Control. That places it in the upper-middle tier of all possible configurations, meaning it outperforms a majority of systems but is not at the extreme high end. To put this in perspective, the ranking reflects a balanced setup where neither component is drastically holding back the other, though the GPU’s 8 GB memory and mid-range positioning do set a ceiling for ultra-high-resolution performance.

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X itself sits in the 81st percentile among all CPUs tested, with an average benchmark score of 29123. Its nearest rivals in raw CPU performance include the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H (scoring 29093, a delta of 0.1%), the Intel Xeon Phi 7210 (29245, delta -0.4%), and the Intel Core i5-13500HX (29270, delta -0.5%). These margins are razor-thin, meaning the 5800X is essentially neck-and-neck with several modern laptop and desktop chips in synthetic workloads. The CPU’s 8-core, 16-thread configuration with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz provides ample headroom for gaming, and its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15476 confirms strong multi-threaded performance.

On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 lands in the 72nd percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 26331. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 860M (26401, delta -0.3%), the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (26421, delta -0.3%), and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary (26553, delta -0.8%). Interestingly, the RTX 5060 also edges out the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT (26011, delta 1.2%). These deltas are small, but they indicate that the RTX 5060 performs in the same league as some older high-end cards and newer integrated graphics solutions, which is notable given its 8 GB GDDR7 memory and 128-bit bus.

In the context of Control specifically, the combo’s rank of 1665 out of 3720 suggests that roughly 45% of tested systems deliver higher frame rates. That is a respectable position, especially considering that many of those higher-ranked combos likely feature more expensive GPUs. The data indicates that this pairing is well-matched for mainstream gaming, with the CPU rarely bottlenecking the GPU at the resolutions tested.

CPU and GPU Roles

Understanding which component dominates in Control requires examining how frame rates scale across resolutions and presets. The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern: the GPU becomes the limiting factor as resolution increases, while the CPU’s influence is more pronounced at lower resolutions where frame rates are higher.

At 1920x1080, the RTX 5060 is pushed hard, but the Ryzen 7 5800X has enough single-thread performance to keep up. The average FPS ranges from 149 at Low settings to 82 at Ultra settings. The jump from Low to Medium is a drop of 43 FPS (149 to 106), while Medium to High drops another 12 FPS (106 to 94), and High to Ultra drops 12 FPS (94 to 82). This scaling suggests that at 1080p, the GPU’s shading units and texture rate are the primary drivers of performance, but the CPU is not causing significant stalls. The 5800X’s single-core Cinebench R23 score of 1574.5 and Geekbench single-core score of 2032 indicate it can handle high-FPS scenarios without becoming a bottleneck.

At 2560x1440, the GPU’s workload increases, and the frame rate drops proportionally. Low settings yield 113 FPS, Medium 80 FPS, High 71 FPS, and Ultra 62 FPS. The delta between Low and Ultra is 51 FPS, which is larger than at 1080p (where the delta was 67 FPS). This indicates that at 1440p, the GPU is still the dominant factor, but the CPU’s role diminishes slightly as frame rates lower. The 5800X’s multi-threaded capabilities (Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15476) are more than sufficient for this resolution, and the bottleneck is clearly the RTX 5060’s raw rasterization performance.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is heavily strained. Low settings produce 76 FPS, Medium 54 FPS, High 48 FPS, and Ultra 42 FPS. The drop from Low to Medium is 22 FPS, and from Medium to High is 6 FPS. This shows that at 4K, the RTX 5060’s 8 GB memory and 128-bit bus become significant constraints. The CPU’s role is minimal here; even a much weaker processor would likely deliver similar frame rates because the GPU is maxed out. The Ryzen 7 5800X’s performance is essentially irrelevant at 4K in this game, as the GPU is the clear limiting factor.

The resolution scaling from 1080p to 1440p to 4K shows a consistent pattern: the RTX 5060 loses roughly 25-30% performance when moving from 1080p to 1440p, and another 30-40% when moving from 1440p to 4K, depending on the preset. This is typical for a mid-range GPU, and it confirms that Control is more GPU-bound than CPU-bound, especially at higher resolutions. The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads are not heavily utilized by this game, which is common for action-adventure titles that rely more on single-thread performance.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of performance across all resolutions and settings. Here is the exact breakdown:

3840x2160 (4K):

• Low settings: 76 FPS average (no min/max data)
• Medium settings: 54 FPS average, with 46 FPS minimum and 62 FPS maximum
• High settings: 48 FPS average (no min/max data)
• Ultra settings: 42 FPS average (no min/max data)

At 4K, only Low settings clear the 60 FPS threshold. Medium settings dip below 60 FPS on average, and the minimum of 46 FPS indicates noticeable stuttering during intense scenes. High and Ultra settings are not playable for smooth gameplay, with averages well below 60 FPS.

2560x1440 (1440p):

• Low settings: 113 FPS average (no min/max data)
• Medium settings: 80 FPS average, with 68 FPS minimum and 92 FPS maximum
• High settings: 71 FPS average (no min/max data)
• Ultra settings: 62 FPS average (no min/max data)

At 1440p, all settings are playable, but Ultra barely clears 60 FPS with an average of 62. The minimum FPS data for Medium (68 FPS) suggests that even during demanding moments, the frame rate stays above the playable threshold. High settings offer a comfortable margin at 71 FPS, and Low settings provide a high-refresh experience at 113 FPS.

1920x1080 (1080p):

• Low settings: 149 FPS average (no min/max data)
• Medium settings: 106 FPS average, with 90 FPS minimum and 122 FPS maximum
• High settings: 94 FPS average (no min/max data)
• Ultra settings: 82 FPS average (no min/max data)

At 1080p, the combo excels. Even Ultra settings deliver 82 FPS on average, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold. Low settings push toward 150 FPS, making this ideal for high-refresh monitors. The minimum FPS of 90 at Medium settings indicates excellent frame pacing, with no significant drops below 60 FPS.

The data shows a clear hierarchy: 1080p is the sweet spot for this combo, 1440p is fully playable with some headroom at lower presets, and 4K requires sacrificing visual quality to maintain smooth performance.

The Verdict

Can this PC run Control? Yes, but the answer depends heavily on resolution and settings. The verdict by resolution is clear:

• 3840x2160 (4K): Only Low settings are playable, with an average FPS of 76. Medium, High, and Ultra all fall below 60 FPS, making them unsuitable for smooth gameplay. If you have a 4K monitor, you must use Low settings to get a playable experience.

• 2560x1440 (1440p): All four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable, with averages of 113, 80, 71, and 62 FPS respectively. Ultra just barely clears the 60 FPS threshold, so you can enjoy maximum visual fidelity at 1440p, though you may notice occasional dips in demanding scenes.

• 1920x1080 (1080p): All presets are playable, with averages of 149, 106, 94, and 82 FPS for Low, Medium, High, and Ultra. This is the resolution where the combo shines, offering smooth performance even at maximum settings.

The verdict is straightforward: if you own a 1080p monitor, this system is excellent for Control. At 1440p, it is fully capable, and at 4K, it is limited to low settings. The RTX 5060’s 8 GB memory is a potential concern for future titles, but for Control, it is sufficient at 1080p and 1440p.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run Control at 4K with high settings?

A: No. At 3840x2160 with High settings, the average FPS is 48, which is well below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Only Low settings at 4K achieve a playable average of 76 FPS.

Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The data shows that 1920x1080 delivers the best performance, with Ultra settings averaging 82 FPS. At 2560x1440, Ultra settings average 62 FPS, which is still playable but with less headroom.

Q: How does the RTX 5060 compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT?

A: The RTX 5060 has an average benchmark score of 26331, while the RX 6750 XT scores 26011. This gives the RTX 5060 a 1.2% advantage, which is a negligible difference in real-world gaming.

Q: Is the Ryzen 7 5800X a bottleneck for the RTX 5060 in Control?

A: At 1080p and 1440p, the CPU is not a significant bottleneck, as frame rates scale consistently with GPU load. At 4K, the GPU is the clear limiting factor, and the CPU’s performance is largely irrelevant.

Q: What are the minimum FPS values for Medium settings?

A: At 3840x2160, Medium settings have a minimum FPS of 46. At 2560x1440, the minimum is 68 FPS. At 1920x1080, the minimum is 90 FPS. These values indicate frame pacing quality.

Q: Does the combo rank high among all tested systems?

A: It ranks 1665th out of 3720 tested combos for Control. This places it in the upper half of systems, but not in the top tier.

Best Settings per Resolution

Based on the measured FPS data and the 60 FPS playable threshold, here are the most demanding presets that maintain smooth performance at each resolution:

• 3840x2160 (4K): The best playable setting is Low, with an average FPS of 76. Medium settings average 54 FPS, which falls below the threshold, so Low is the only option for 4K gaming.

• 2560x1440 (1440p): The best playable setting is Ultra, with an average FPS of 62. This is a tight margin, but it clears the 60 FPS requirement. If you prefer more headroom, High settings average 71 FPS, but Ultra is technically playable.

• 1920x1080 (1080p): The best playable setting is Ultra, with an average FPS of 82. This provides a comfortable buffer above 60 FPS, ensuring smooth gameplay even during intense combat sequences. For higher refresh rates, Low settings deliver 149 FPS, but Ultra is the recommended maximum preset.

In summary, this combo is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming. At 1080p, you can max out the game and enjoy smooth performance. At 1440p, you can also max out settings, but the frame rate is closer to the edge. At 4K, you must drop to Low settings to maintain playability, which sacrifices significant visual fidelity. The Ryzen 7 5800X provides solid CPU performance, while the RTX 5060 is a capable mid-range GPU that handles Control well at mainstream resolutions.