Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Control
Action Adventure 2019

Control

62%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
140 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
77 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
106 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
58 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
71 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
39 FPS
11.4ms Frame Time
17ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,485
Your CPU 25,517
Graphics Card
Required 27,787
Your GPU 17,639

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 39 45 51 71
1440p QHD 58 67 75 106
1080p Full HD 77 88 99 140

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 88
1920x1080 Low 140
1920x1080 Medium 99
1920x1080 Ultra 77
2560x1440 High 67
2560x1440 Low 106
2560x1440 Medium 75
2560x1440 Ultra 58
3840x2160 High 45
3840x2160 Low 71
3840x2160 Medium 51
3840x2160 Ultra 39

Performance Analysis: Control on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 pairing delivers a solid Control experience across most common display configurations, though 4K requires careful settings management. The 8-core, 16-thread Zen 3 CPU combined with the Ada Lovelace GPU produces playable frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, while 2160p remains viable only at the lowest preset. This analysis uses measured data from the benchmark database to break down optimal settings, component roles, and how this combo compares to other tested configurations.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset delivers an average of 77 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold with comfortable headroom. The data shows no reason to drop below Ultra at this resolution, as even the most demanding settings remain fluid. The Medium preset hits 99 FPS average, Low reaches 140 FPS, and High lands at 88 FPS, but Ultra at 77 FPS is the clear recommendation for maximum visual fidelity without sacrificing smoothness.

Moving to 2560x1440, High is the best playable setting with an average of 67 FPS. This stays above the 60 FPS line, but Ultra dips to 58 FPS average, which falls short of the playable threshold. Medium runs at 75 FPS and Low at 106 FPS, but High offers the best balance of image quality and performance. The data suggests that at 1440p, the GPU becomes the limiting factor when pushing beyond High, as the 8 GB VRAM buffer and 128-bit memory bus start to constrain texture-heavy scenes.

At 3840x2160, only Low remains playable, averaging 71 FPS. Medium falls to 51 FPS, High drops to 45 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 39 FPS. The jump from Low to Medium represents a 20 FPS loss, indicating that the RTX 4060 simply cannot sustain higher presets at 4K. Players with 4K displays should stick to Low for a responsive experience, accepting reduced detail levels to maintain frame rates above the 60 FPS target.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals a clear shift in bottleneck behavior across resolutions. At 1080p, the Ryzen 7 5700 provides ample headroom, as evidenced by the scaling from Low to Ultra: 140 FPS down to 77 FPS represents a 45% performance drop driven almost entirely by GPU workload. The CPU's 16 threads and strong single-core performance keep frame pacing consistent even at high settings, where the RTX 4060's 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 throughput becomes the primary constraint.

At 1440p, the GPU's role intensifies. The gap between Low (106 FPS) and Ultra (58 FPS) widens to 45%, but the absolute frame rates drop roughly 24-25% compared to 1080p at equivalent settings. This scaling pattern indicates the RTX 4060 is the limiting factor, as the CPU's workload per frame remains similar while the GPU pixel throughput requirements increase. The 67 FPS High result versus 58 FPS Ultra shows that the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for High but insufficient for Ultra texture loads at this resolution.

At 2160p, the GPU dominates entirely. The CPU's role becomes nearly negligible, as even Low settings produce 71 FPS while Medium drops to 51 FPS. This 20 FPS delta between presets demonstrates that the RTX 4060's shading units, TMUs, and ROPs are saturated, regardless of CPU capability. The Ryzen 7 5700's 3.70 GHz base and 4.60 GHz boost clocks provide sufficient geometry processing, but the 4K pixel count overwhelms the GPU's 118.1 GPixel/s pixel rate.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Control at 1440p with maximum settings?

A: No. The Ultra preset at 2560x1440 averages 58 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. High settings average 67 FPS and remain the best playable option at this resolution.

Q: What is the best 4K setting for this combo?

A: Low is the only playable preset at 3840x2160, averaging 71 FPS. Medium drops to 51 FPS, High to 45 FPS, and Ultra to 39 FPS, all below the 60 FPS target.

Q: How does the RTX 4060 compare to its nearest rival in overall GPU benchmarks?

A: The RTX 4060's average benchmark score of 17639 is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon HD 7790's 17666, a difference of -0.2%. The AMD Radeon 780M trails by 0.3%, while the Radeon Pro 560 and Pro 460 sit 0.5% and 0.7% behind respectively.

Q: Is the Ryzen 7 5700 significantly faster than its closest CPU competitors?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700's average benchmark score of 25517 is within 0.3% of all four nearest rivals. The Intel Xeon D-2752TER scores 25530 (-0.1%), AMD Ryzen 5 7640U scores 25485 (+0.1%), AMD Ryzen 5 6600H scores 25550 (-0.1%), and AMD Ryzen 7 5825U scores 25446 (+0.3%).

Q: What frame rates can I expect at 1080p Medium settings?

A: The Medium preset at 1920x1080 averages 99 FPS, with minimum and maximum readings of 84 and 114 FPS respectively. This provides a smooth experience with substantial headroom above the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: Does this combo rank highly among all tested configurations for Control?

A: The combo ranks 2008 out of 3720 tested combinations, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the database. This reflects the RTX 4060's mid-range positioning rather than the CPU, which sits at the 78th percentile among all CPUs.

The Verdict

The data confirms this system can run Control effectively at 1080p and 1440p, with limitations at 4K. At 1920x1080, all four presets clear 60 FPS, with Ultra averaging 77 FPS — this is the recommended configuration for full visual quality. At 2560x1440, High settings average 67 FPS and represent the best playable experience, while Ultra falls short at 58 FPS. At 3840x2160, only Low achieves playable performance at 71 FPS; Medium, High, and Ultra all fail to reach the 60 FPS threshold.

The playable settings per resolution align with the verdict data: 1080p supports High, Low, Medium, and Ultra; 1440p supports High, Low, and Medium; 4K supports only Low. For gamers prioritizing visual fidelity, the 1080p Ultra preset offers the best combination of quality and smoothness. For 1440p users, High strikes the optimal balance. 4K owners should accept Low settings or consider a more powerful GPU, as this combo cannot maintain playable frame rates with higher detail levels.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The Ryzen 7 5700's nearest CPU rivals show that performance is tightly clustered. The Intel Xeon D-2752TER scores 25530, just 0.1% below the Ryzen, making it a near-identical match for CPU-bound scenarios. The AMD Ryzen 5 7640U scores 25485 at 0.1% above, while the AMD Ryzen 5 6600H scores 25550 at 0.1% below. The AMD Ryzen 7 5825U scores 25446, 0.3% above. All four alternatives would deliver virtually indistinguishable frame rates in Control, as the game's CPU demands are modest relative to these processors' capabilities.

On the GPU side, the RTX 4060's nearest rivals present an interesting comparison. The AMD Radeon HD 7790 scores 17666, just 0.2% higher, though its older architecture may lack modern feature support. The AMD Radeon 780M scores 17588 at 0.3% below, representing an integrated solution that would perform similarly in raw compute but likely struggle with memory bandwidth in demanding scenes. The AMD Radeon Pro 560 and Pro 460 score 17551 and 17509 respectively, 0.5% and 0.7% below, offering comparable average performance but with professional-grade drivers that may affect gaming behavior differently.

For Control specifically, these GPU alternatives would produce nearly identical frame rates at each resolution and preset, as the average benchmark scores translate to similar rasterization throughput. However, the RTX 4060's 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth provide an advantage in texture-heavy scenes that these rivals may not match.

How This Combo Ranks

Among 3720 tested CPU-GPU combinations for Control, this pairing ranks 2008th, placing it in the 46th percentile. This mid-pack positioning reflects the RTX 4060's 61st percentile standing among all GPUs, while the Ryzen 7 5700 sits at the 78th percentile among CPUs. The combination's rank suggests that the GPU is the primary constraint in most scenarios, as the CPU offers above-average headroom that the GPU cannot fully utilize at higher resolutions.

The 1080p results demonstrate this imbalance: the system achieves 77 FPS at Ultra, which is respectable but not exceptional for a CPU in the 78th percentile. At 4K, the rank becomes even more GPU-limited, with only 39 FPS at Ultra. Gamers considering this combo should understand that the Ryzen 7 5700 has significant untapped potential for more demanding GPUs, while the RTX 4060 represents the performance ceiling for this particular pairing. Upgrading the GPU would yield larger gains than upgrading the CPU, based on the observed scaling patterns across resolutions and presets.