Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Control
Action Adventure 2019

Control

67%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
124 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
68 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
94 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
52 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
63 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
35 FPS
12.8ms Frame Time
19ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,485
Your CPU 25,005
Graphics Card
Required 27,787
Your GPU 21,035

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 35 40 45 63
1440p QHD 52 59 67 94
1080p Full HD 68 78 88 124

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 78
1920x1080 Low 124
1920x1080 Medium 88
1920x1080 Ultra 68
2560x1440 High 59
2560x1440 Low 94
2560x1440 Medium 67
2560x1440 Ultra 52
3840x2160 High 40
3840x2160 Low 63
3840x2160 Medium 45
3840x2160 Ultra 35

Performance Analysis: Control on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 delivers a playable experience in Control, but the quality ceiling varies sharply with resolution. At 1080p, this combo clears the 60 FPS threshold at every preset, while 1440p requires a drop to Medium settings, and 4K is only viable at Low. The measured frame rates show a system that is well-balanced for 1080p gaming, but which quickly runs into GPU limits as pixel count rises.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160 (4K), the RTX 5050 is clearly the bottleneck. The High preset averages 40 FPS, which is well below the 60 FPS playability threshold. Dropping to Medium improves the average to 45 FPS, with a minimum of 38 FPS and a maximum of 52 FPS—the only resolution in the dataset with min/max values recorded. The Ultra preset falls to 35 FPS average, making it unusable at this resolution. Low settings are the only option that reaches playability, averaging 63 FPS.

At 2560x1440 (1440p), the situation improves significantly. The Low preset delivers 94 FPS average, which is more than enough for smooth gameplay. Medium settings drop to 67 FPS average, with a minimum of 57 FPS and a maximum of 77 FPS. This is the best playable preset at 1440p, as High averages 59 FPS—just one frame below the 60 FPS threshold—and Ultra averages 52 FPS.

At 1920x1080 (1080p), the combo performs admirably across the board. The Low preset hits 124 FPS average, Medium reaches 88 FPS (minimum 75, maximum 101), High averages 78 FPS, and Ultra still manages 68 FPS. Every preset at 1080p clears the 60 FPS line, with the Ultra setting providing a comfortable margin above the playability threshold.

The frame rate scaling follows a predictable pattern: dropping from Ultra to Low at 1080p yields an 82% performance increase (68 to 124 FPS), while the same preset change at 4K yields an 80% increase (35 to 63 FPS). This consistency suggests the GPU is the limiting factor at all resolutions, with the CPU providing sufficient headroom.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F sits at the 77th percentile among all tested processors, with an average benchmark score of 25,005. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F, which scores 24,964—a delta of just 0.2%. In practical terms, these two chips are interchangeable for gaming performance. The Intel Core i7-11850H (24,935, 0.3% delta) and Intel Core i7-13620H (24,911, 0.4% delta) are also within a rounding error, meaning any of these processors would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Control. The AMD EPYC 9474F (25,103, -0.4% delta) is a server part that performs similarly in synthetic tests but is not a realistic desktop alternative.

For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 ranks at the 66th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 21,035. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL (21,153, -0.6% delta), which would deliver virtually identical performance in Control. The AMD Radeon HD 8970M (21,237, -1% delta) and NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile (21,379, -1.6% delta) are also close, though these are mobile parts. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (20,713, 1.6% delta) is the closest desktop alternative, running about 1.6% slower on average—a difference that would not be noticeable in gameplay.

When pairing these alternatives, a system with the Ryzen 5 7500F and RX 5600 XT would behave nearly identically to the 8400F/RTX 5050 combo, with the GPU delta being the only meaningful variance. The CPU differences are so small (under 0.5%) that they would not shift any frame rate by more than a frame or two.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Low, which averages 63 FPS. This is the only playable option at 4K, and the 3 FPS margin above the threshold is thin—any demanding scene could push it below 60.

At 2560x1440, the best playable setting is Medium, averaging 67 FPS. The minimum of 57 FPS means there will be occasional dips below the 60 FPS line, but the average holds comfortably above it. High at 59 FPS is technically unplayable by the 60 FPS threshold, so Medium is the clear choice.

At 1920x1080, the best preset is Ultra, averaging 68 FPS. This provides the full visual experience with an 8 FPS buffer above the threshold. If you prefer higher frame rates, Low hits 124 FPS and Medium reaches 88 FPS, but Ultra is the recommended setting for visual quality without sacrificing playability.

The Verdict

This PC can run Control, but the experience depends entirely on your target resolution. At 1920x1080, the combo clears 60 FPS at all four presets (High, Low, Medium, and Ultra), making it fully playable at maximum settings. The Ultra preset’s 68 FPS average provides a solid margin, so this is the resolution where the system shines.

At 2560x1440, only Low and Medium presets clear 60 FPS. The Medium preset averages 67 FPS, which is playable, but the 57 FPS minimum indicates occasional stutter. High falls just short at 59 FPS, making it unsuitable by the defined threshold. This resolution is usable, but you must compromise on visual quality.

At 3840x2160, only Low settings clear 60 FPS, averaging 63 FPS. This is technically playable but leaves no headroom, and the visual fidelity is significantly reduced. Ultra at 35 FPS and High at 40 FPS are not viable options.

The data indicates this is a 1080p gaming system for Control. At 1440p, it works with Medium settings, and at 4K, it barely meets the threshold with Low settings. The GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions, while the CPU has ample performance headroom.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Control at 4K with High settings?

A: No. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 High is 40 FPS, which is well below the 60 FPS playability threshold. Only Low settings at 4K reach playable frame rates (63 FPS average).

Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming?

A: Medium is the best playable preset at 2560x1440, averaging 67 FPS with a minimum of 57 FPS. High averages 59 FPS, just below the 60 FPS threshold, so it is not considered playable.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck in this setup?

A: The GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU scores at the 77th percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 66th percentile. The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K follows a GPU-bound pattern, with similar performance drops across preset changes.

Q: How does the RTX 5050 compare to the RX 5600 XT?

A: The RTX 5050 has an average benchmark score of 21,035, which is 1.6% higher than the RX 5600 XT’s 20,713. In Control, this would translate to roughly 1-2 FPS difference at any given preset and resolution.

Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1080p with Ultra settings?

A: The Ultra preset at 1920x1080 averages 68 FPS. This is above the 60 FPS threshold, making it the recommended setting for maximum visual quality at this resolution.

Q: Does the system ever dip below 60 FPS at 1080p?

A: Yes, at Medium settings the minimum recorded FPS is 75, which is above 60. However, the dataset only includes min/max values for Medium presets, so dip behavior at other presets is not measured. All 1080p averages are above 60 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks

This specific combination of AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 ranks 2,296 out of 3,720 tested combos in Control. This places it in the 38th percentile of all tested systems, meaning roughly 62% of configurations outperform it in this game. The rank reflects the GPU’s mid-tier positioning—the RTX 5050’s 66th percentile GPU score is the primary driver, while the CPU’s 77th percentile ranking provides adequate support.

In practical terms, this combo is positioned well for 1080p gaming but falls behind more powerful setups at higher resolutions. The rank of 2,296 suggests that while this system is not at the top of the charts, it is far from the bottom. For a mainstream 1080p-focused build, this ranking is reasonable. The gap between this combo and higher-ranked systems will widen at 4K, where the RTX 5050’s 8 GB memory buffer and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth become more significant limitations. At 1080p, however, the rank is more than adequate for a smooth experience in Control at Ultra settings.