Control

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is a formidable combination for Control, a 2019 Action Adventure title. Benchmark results show this combo ranks 639th out of 3,720 tested combinations, placing it in the top 18% of all configurations. This ranking is reinforced by the individual component percentiles: the CPU sits at the 77th percentile of all processors, while the GPU reaches the 83rd percentile of all graphics cards. The data indicates a system that comfortably handles the game's demands across all tested resolutions, though the headroom varies significantly between 1080p and 4K.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank of 639 out of 3,720 tested combinations places it in the upper echelon of systems evaluated for Control. This is a strong showing, signaling that the pairing of these two components is well-balanced for this specific title. The CPU's average benchmark score of 25,005 and the GPU's average of 43,223 both contribute to this high placement, suggesting neither component is a severe bottleneck at the game's default settings. The percentile rankings reinforce this: the Ryzen 5 8400F outperforms 77% of all CPUs, and the RTX 4070 SUPER outperforms 83% of all GPUs. When combined, they produce a system that is clearly positioned for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1440p and smooth 4K experiences, as the measured FPS data will show. The rank implies that a substantial majority of tested systems will deliver lower frame rates in Control, making this combo a strong contender for players seeking high visual fidelity without sacrificing performance.

CPU and GPU Roles

The relationship between the CPU and GPU shifts as resolution and settings change, a pattern visible in the measured FPS data. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves 214 FPS, which is the highest frame rate recorded. This suggests that at lower resolutions and less demanding presets, the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU enough data to reach very high frame rates. However, the GPU is still the primary driver of performance, as the frame rate scales down to 118 FPS at Ultra settings in the same resolution, indicating that the increased graphical load is being handled by the GPU. Moving to 2560x1440, the Low setting yields 162 FPS, while Ultra drops to 89 FPS; this 73 FPS gap highlights the GPU's growing influence as pixel count increases.

At 3840x2160, the GPU's role becomes even more dominant. The Low preset produces 110 FPS, but the Ultra preset falls to 60 FPS, a 50 FPS reduction. This scaling shows that the RTX 4070 SUPER is the limiting factor at 4K, as the CPU's performance headroom is less relevant when the GPU is working to render four times the pixels of 1080p. The data implies that at 1080p and 1440p, the CPU provides a solid foundation, but the GPU is the component that determines the final frame rate, especially as settings and resolution increase. Players targeting maximum frame rates at 1080p will find the CPU sufficient, while those pushing 4K Ultra will be entirely dependent on the GPU's capabilities.

Best Settings per Resolution

For players aiming for a consistent 60 FPS experience, the data shows that this combo can achieve that target at every resolution with the most demanding preset. At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset delivers an average of 60 FPS, which is exactly the playable threshold. This is the highest quality setting that maintains the target, and it is the recommended choice for 4K. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset averages 89 FPS, providing comfortable headroom above the 60 FPS threshold. This makes 1440p the sweet spot for high-refresh-rate monitors, as the average frame rate is well above the minimum requirement. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset averages 118 FPS, which is nearly double the 60 FPS target, offering an exceptionally smooth experience for competitive or fast-paced play. In each case, the Ultra preset is the best option, as it is the most demanding setting that still clears the playable threshold.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Examining the nearest rivals for both components provides context for what other hardware might offer similar performance. The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F's closest competitor is the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F, which has an average score of 24,964, a mere 0.2% difference. This indicates that the two CPUs are essentially interchangeable in gaming workloads. The Intel Core i7-11850H and Intel Core i7-13620H are also close, with scores of 24,935 and 24,911, representing 0.3% and 0.4% deltas, respectively. These processors would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Control.

On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is closely matched by the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB, which has an average score of 43,262, just 0.1% lower. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 also show similar performance with 0.1% and 0.2% deltas. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is slightly ahead at 43,667, a 1% difference. These rivals suggest that users with these alternative components would see nearly identical performance in Control, with the RTX 4090 Mobile providing a marginal edge. The data indicates that the RTX 4070 SUPER sits in a performance tier where small variations in benchmark scores translate to imperceptible differences in actual frame rates for this game.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a detailed view of performance across all resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves an average of 214 FPS, while Medium averages 152 FPS with a minimum of 130 and a maximum of 175. High averages 135 FPS, and Ultra averages 118 FPS. This progression shows a steady decline as graphical demands increase, but even the lowest average is far above the 60 FPS threshold. At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 162 FPS, Medium averages 115 FPS with a minimum of 98 and a maximum of 133, High averages 102 FPS, and Ultra averages 89 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 73 FPS, demonstrating the impact of resolution scaling on the GPU.

At 3840x2160, the Low preset averages 110 FPS, Medium averages 78 FPS with a minimum of 66 and a maximum of 90, High averages 69 FPS, and Ultra averages 60 FPS. The minimum FPS values for Medium settings at all resolutions provide insight into frame time consistency: at 1080p, the minimum is 130 FPS; at 1440p, it is 98 FPS; and at 4K, it is 66 FPS. These minimums indicate that even in demanding scenes, the combo maintains frame rates well above the playable threshold, with the 4K Medium preset being the only case where the minimum approaches the 60 FPS line. The data shows a consistent pattern: as resolution increases, all settings see lower average frame rates, but the system never drops below 60 FPS in any measured configuration.

The Verdict

This PC can absolutely run Control, and it does so with exceptional performance across all tested resolutions. The verdict by resolution confirms that the Ultra preset is playable at every resolution, with average frame rates of 60 FPS at 3840x2160, 89 FPS at 2560x1440, and 118 FPS at 1920x1080. The 4K Ultra setting is the most demanding configuration tested, and it clears the 60 FPS threshold by exactly one frame per second, making it a viable option for players who prioritize visual quality. At 1440p, the Ultra preset provides a significant buffer above the threshold, making it ideal for high-refresh-rate displays. At 1080p, the system delivers frame rates that exceed the refresh rates of most monitors, ensuring a consistently fluid experience. The data strongly suggests that this combo is overqualified for 1080p and 1440p gaming in Control, while being perfectly adequate for 4K at maximum settings.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Control at 4K Ultra settings?

A: Yes, the measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 60 FPS, which exactly meets the playable threshold of 60 FPS.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p?

A: The Ultra preset at 2560x1440 achieves an average of 89 FPS, making it the most demanding setting that remains well above the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rival?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F has an average benchmark score of 25,005, which is 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F's score of 24,964, indicating nearly identical performance.

Q: What is the lowest average FPS recorded at 1080p?

A: The lowest average FPS at 1920x1080 is 118 FPS, which occurs with the Ultra settings preset.

Q: Is the GPU more important than the CPU at 4K?

A: Yes, the data shows a 50 FPS drop from Low to Ultra at 3840x2160, indicating the GPU is the primary bottleneck at this resolution.

Q: What is the highest average FPS achieved by this combo?

A: The highest average FPS is 214, which is achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings.