Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Control
Action Adventure 2019

Control

71%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
180 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
101 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
136 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
78 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
91 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
54 FPS
8.5ms Frame Time
13ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,485
Your CPU 25,005
Graphics Card
Required 27,787
Your GPU 23,877

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 54 57 65 91
1440p QHD 78 89 100 136
1080p Full HD 101 117 129 180

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 117
1920x1080 Low 180
1920x1080 Medium 129
1920x1080 Ultra 101
2560x1440 High 89
2560x1440 Low 136
2560x1440 Medium 100
2560x1440 Ultra 78
3840x2160 High 57
3840x2160 Low 91
3840x2160 Medium 65
3840x2160 Ultra 54

Performance Analysis: Control on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 delivers a robust Control experience, ranking 1131st out of 3720 tested combinations. This places the combo in the top third of all systems benchmarked, indicating strong overall capability. The data shows that this configuration is well-suited for high-refresh-rate gaming at mainstream resolutions, with performance scaling predictably as resolution and quality settings increase.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank of 1131 out of 3720 tested combinations places it above the median, confirming that this pairing is more capable than the average system tested for Control. The percentile positioning of the individual components reinforces this: the Ryzen 5 8400F sits in the 77th percentile among all CPUs, while the RX 9070 falls in the 69th percentile among all GPUs. This suggests a balanced pairing where neither component is drastically bottlenecking the other, although the GPU's lower percentile relative to the CPU hints that the graphics card will be the limiting factor at higher settings.

In practical terms, this rank translates to a system that can handle the game's demanding physics and particle effects without significant compromise. The measured FPS data confirms this, with the combo achieving playable frame rates at every tested resolution and setting combination, with the sole exception of Ultra settings at 4K. The gap between the combo's rank and the top-performing systems is substantial, but the performance delivered is more than sufficient for a smooth experience in most scenarios.

CPU and GPU Roles

The division of labor between the Ryzen 5 8400F and the RX 9070 shifts noticeably across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the CPU's influence is more pronounced; the 8400F's six Zen 4 cores and 12 threads, with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, are capable of feeding the GPU efficiently. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p shows a drop from 179.8 FPS to 100.7 FPS, a 44% reduction, indicating that the GPU is doing progressively more work as settings increase, but the CPU maintains high frame delivery.

At 2560x1440, the GPU begins to assert its dominance. The transition from 1080p High to 1440p High results in a 24.2% performance decrease, from 117.2 FPS to 88.8 FPS. This is a smaller relative drop than the setting-based scaling at 1080p, suggesting the GPU is becoming the primary constraint. The RX 9070's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth allow it to handle the increased pixel count efficiently, while the CPU's role diminishes.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is unequivocally the bottleneck. The RX 9070's raw compute power, rated at 36.13 TFLOPS FP32, is taxed heavily, with High settings producing 56.6 FPS and Ultra dropping to 53.7 FPS. The CPU's contribution is minimal here, as the frame rate is dictated almost entirely by the GPU's ability to render the 8.3 million pixels. The scaling between 1440p and 4K at High settings shows a 36.3% drop, confirming that the GPU is the limiting factor at this resolution.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo excels across all presets. Low settings produce an average of 179.8 FPS, which is exceptionally high and indicates the CPU and GPU are not stressed. Medium settings yield 128.8 FPS, still far above the 60 FPS threshold. High settings deliver 117.2 FPS, and even Ultra settings maintain 100.7 FPS. The consistency across these presets shows a well-balanced system, with no single component creating a severe bottleneck.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance remains strong. Low settings achieve 135.9 FPS, Medium reaches 99.6 FPS, High produces 88.8 FPS, and Ultra maintains 77.8 FPS. The drop from Low to Ultra is 42.8%, which is slightly steeper than at 1080p, reflecting the increased GPU load. However, all presets remain comfortably above the 60 FPS playability threshold, making 1440p an excellent resolution for this combo.

At 3840x2160, the GPU's limits become apparent. Low settings still deliver a playable 90.9 FPS, and Medium maintains 64.8 FPS. However, High settings drop to 56.6 FPS, just below the 60 FPS target, and Ultra falls to 53.7 FPS. This resolution requires sacrificing visual quality to maintain smooth gameplay, as only Low and Medium presets clear the playability threshold. The data indicates that 4K gaming is possible but not with the highest quality settings.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Control at 4K Ultra settings?

A: No, the measured average FPS at 3840x2160 Ultra is 53.7 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The highest playable preset at this resolution is Medium, which achieves 64.8 FPS.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo?

A: The data shows that 2560x1440 is the sweet spot. All four presets, from Low to Ultra, maintain frame rates above 60 FPS, with Ultra averaging 77.8 FPS. This provides a balance between visual fidelity and smooth performance.

Q: How does the RX 9070 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RX 9070's nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z, which has an average benchmark score 0.6% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 6800S is 0.8% lower, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile is 1.1% higher. These differences are minimal, indicating the RX 9070 performs within 1.2% of these cards.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 8400F a bottleneck for the RX 9070?

A: At lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU has more influence, but it is not a significant bottleneck. The 8400F's 3DMark max-thread score of 6165 and single-thread score of 951 show strong performance. At 4K, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor, with frame rates dropping below 60 FPS at High and Ultra settings.

Q: What FPS can I expect at 1080p High settings?

A: The measured average FPS at 1920x1080 High settings is 117.2 FPS. This is well above the 60 FPS threshold and provides a very smooth experience.

Q: Does the system maintain 60 FPS at 1440p Ultra?

A: Yes, the measured average at 2560x1440 Ultra is 77.8 FPS. This is 29.7% above the 60 FPS threshold, providing a comfortable margin for demanding scenes.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The Ryzen 5 8400F's nearest rivals in CPU benchmark scores include the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F, which scores 0.2% higher, and the Intel Core i7-11850H, which scores 0.3% higher. The Intel Core i7-13620H is 0.4% higher, and the AMD EPYC 9474F is 0.4% lower. These CPUs would provide essentially identical CPU-bound performance in Control, meaning the frame rates at lower resolutions would be nearly indistinguishable.

For the GPU, the RX 9070's nearest rivals show similar performance. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z has an average score 0.6% higher, while the AMD Radeon RX 6800S is 0.8% lower. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile is 1.1% higher, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER is 1.2% lower. Any of these GPUs paired with the 8400F would produce frame rates within a few percent of the measured results, making them viable alternatives if the RX 9070 is unavailable.

The practical implication is that upgrading or downgrading to any of these components would result in a negligible performance difference in Control. The combination's ranking would remain similar, and the playable settings at each resolution would stay the same. Users with these alternative components can expect very similar gameplay experiences.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which achieves an average of 100.7 FPS. This provides the maximum visual quality with a significant performance buffer, ensuring smooth gameplay even in intense combat scenarios.

At 2560x1440, Ultra settings also clear the 60 FPS threshold, with an average of 77.8 FPS. This is the recommended configuration for 1440p, as it delivers high fidelity with a 29.7% margin above the minimum playable frame rate.

At 3840x2160, the most demanding playable preset is Medium, which averages 64.8 FPS. This is the highest quality setting that maintains performance above 60 FPS. High settings drop to 56.6 FPS, which does not meet the playability threshold, and Ultra falls to 53.7 FPS. For 4K, Medium is the maximum recommended preset.

The Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and AMD Radeon RX 9070 can run Control effectively across all tested resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system clears 60 FPS on every preset, including Ultra at 100.7 FPS. At 2560x1440, all settings are playable, with Ultra achieving 77.8 FPS. At 3840x2160, the system is limited to Low and Medium presets, with Medium providing 64.8 FPS.

The verdict by resolution confirms that this combo is fully playable at 1080p and 1440p with maximum settings. At 4K, users must choose between Medium quality at 64.8 FPS or lower settings for higher frame rates. The system is not capable of sustaining 60 FPS at 4K High or Ultra, but the performance at lower presets ensures the game remains fully playable. This is a strong result for a mainstream mid-range combination, delivering excellent performance in Control without requiring the highest-end hardware.