Control

# Control Performance Analysis: AMD Ryzen 5 7600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 delivers exceptional performance in Control, with benchmark results showing this combination comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS playability threshold across every resolution and preset tested. The measured data spans three resolutions (1920x1080, 2560x1440, and 3840x2160) and four quality settings (Low, Medium, High, Ultra), producing average frame rates ranging from a minimum of 81.4 FPS at 4K Ultra to a maximum of 258.6 FPS at 1080p Low. This places the combo in the 66th percentile position out of 3,720 tested combinations for this game, indicating strong but not absolute top-tier standing.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, this system produces outstanding frame rates across all settings. Low preset averages 258.6 FPS, Medium reaches 201.2 FPS, High delivers 178.4 FPS, and Ultra maintains 158 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra represents a 100.6 FPS drop, yet even the most demanding preset at this resolution remains nearly three times above the 60 FPS playability threshold. The data indicates headroom for high refresh rate displays at 1080p, with all presets exceeding 144 FPS targets.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance remains exceptionally strong. Low preset averages 215.7 FPS, Medium achieves 154.6 FPS, High produces 132.8 FPS, and Ultra holds at 119.8 FPS. The transition from 1080p to 1440p at Ultra reduces average frame rate by 38.2 FPS, a 24.2% decrease. Even at the highest quality setting, the system maintains nearly double the playability threshold, suggesting 1440p Ultra is a realistic target for smooth gameplay.

At 3840x2160, the system still delivers playable performance at every preset. Low averages 146.2 FPS, Medium reaches 104.2 FPS, High produces 91 FPS, and Ultra maintains 81.4 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is 64.8 FPS, reflecting the increased GPU workload at higher resolutions. The 4K Ultra result of 81.4 FPS remains comfortably above 60 FPS, though it represents the most demanding scenario tested.

The progression across resolutions shows consistent behavior: each step from 1080p to 1440p to 4K reduces frame rates by roughly 30-40% depending on preset. The Low preset experiences the smallest absolute drop (258.6 to 215.7 to 146.2 FPS), while Ultra shows the most significant decline (158 to 119.8 to 81.4 FPS). This pattern suggests the RTX 5090's capabilities are increasingly taxed as pixel count grows, particularly at higher quality settings.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals how the balance between CPU and GPU responsibilities shifts across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the Ryzen 5 7600's 6-core, 12-thread configuration with a 5.10 GHz boost clock appears to play a significant role, as frame rates reach 258.6 FPS at Low settings—a level where CPU overhead typically becomes a limiting factor. The 3.80 GHz base clock and 32 MB shared L3 cache provide sufficient single-thread performance to feed the RTX 5090 at lower resolutions.

As resolution increases to 2560x1440 and 3840x2160, the GPU's workload grows substantially. The RTX 5090's 21,760 shading units and 1.79 TB/s memory bandwidth become the dominant factor, with frame rate differences between presets widening. At 4K, the GPU's 32 GB GDDR7 memory and 512-bit bus width are fully utilized, explaining why Ultra settings (81.4 FPS) show a 44.3% reduction from Low settings (146.2 FPS) at that resolution.

The scaling between presets provides further insight. At 1080p, the jump from Low to Ultra costs 100.6 FPS (38.9% reduction). At 1440p, the same preset transition costs 95.9 FPS (44.5% reduction). At 4K, the cost is 64.8 FPS (44.3% reduction). The percentage reduction stabilizes at higher resolutions, indicating GPU-bound behavior, while the smaller percentage drop at 1080p suggests partial CPU limitation at lower quality settings.

The RTX 5090's 170 RT cores and 680 tensor cores are relevant for Control, a game known for physics-based destruction and visual effects. However, the measured data focuses on standard rendering presets, with the GPU's raw rasterization performance (104.8 TFLOPS FP32) proving sufficient to maintain high frame rates even at 4K Ultra. The CPU's 65 W TDP and 5 nm process node contribute to sustained performance without thermal throttling concerns in typical desktop configurations.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Examining the nearest rivals for each component provides context for what other hardware might deliver similar results. For the Ryzen 5 7600, the closest equivalents in average benchmark score include the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (0.2% higher score), AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS (0.3% lower), Intel Core i9-11900KF (0.4% higher), and AMD Ryzen 5 8540U (0.5% higher). These alternatives span mobile and desktop platforms, suggesting the 7600's performance level is achievable across various form factors.

The RTX 5090's nearest rivals in benchmark scores include the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB (0.3% lower), NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB (0.6% lower), AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT (1.1% lower), and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X (1.4% higher). Notably, the Tesla P100 models are data center-oriented GPUs, while the RX 6850M XT is a mobile part, indicating the RTX 5090's benchmark performance sits in a unique position relative to both workstation and consumer hardware.

For gaming specifically, the measured FPS results suggest that any combination featuring GPUs in the RTX 5090's performance class would deliver similar frame rates in Control. The deltaPct values of 0.3% to 1.4% among rivals indicate that these alternatives would produce nearly identical results, with differences of only a few frames per second at most. Users with the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X (1.4% higher score) might see marginally better performance, while those with the RX 6850M XT (1.1% lower) would experience slightly reduced frame rates.

The CPU alternatives present a more nuanced picture. Since Control at higher resolutions becomes GPU-bound, the Ryzen 9 6900HX or Core i9-11900KF would likely match the 7600's performance in most scenarios. However, at 1080p Low where CPU overhead matters, differences could emerge despite similar average benchmark scores. The 7600's 78th percentile ranking among all CPUs, combined with its 12,735 Cinebench R23 multicore score, positions it as a capable gaming processor that won't bottleneck the RTX 5090 in most situations.

The Verdict

This system can run Control at playable frame rates across all tested configurations. The verdict data confirms that every resolution and preset combination clears the 60 FPS threshold. At 3840x2160, all four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable, with Ultra achieving 81.4 FPS—the lowest result in the entire dataset but still 21.4 FPS above the playability threshold. This makes 4K Ultra a viable option for users prioritizing visual quality over maximum refresh rates.

At 2560x1440, the system delivers even stronger performance, with Ultra settings producing 119.8 FPS and Low reaching 215.7 FPS. This resolution offers an excellent balance between visual fidelity and smoothness, suitable for high-refresh-rate monitors. The 1920x1080 results are exceptional across the board, with Ultra maintaining 158 FPS and Low hitting 258.6 FPS, making this resolution ideal for competitive play or extremely high refresh rate displays.

The benchmark data indicates that this combination has substantial headroom beyond the 60 FPS threshold. Even the most demanding scenario tested—4K Ultra at 81.4 FPS—provides a comfortable margin. Users seeking higher frame rates at 4K could enable upscaling or adjust specific settings, though the data suggests such measures are unnecessary for basic playability. The system's performance is consistent and predictable, with no scenarios falling below the playability threshold.

How This Combo Ranks

Among 3,720 tested CPU-GPU combinations in Control, this pairing ranks 66th, placing it in the top 2% of all configurations. This ranking reflects the RTX 5090's exceptional GPU performance (92nd percentile among all GPUs) combined with the Ryzen 5 7600's solid CPU showing (78th percentile among all CPUs). The rank of 66 indicates that while this combo is elite, there are 65 other configurations that achieve higher average performance in this game.

The ranking suggests that the combination is not the absolute fastest possible pairing for Control, likely due to the CPU's mid-range positioning relative to flagship processors. However, the measured FPS data shows that this rank translates to excellent real-world performance, with even the weakest result (4K Ultra at 81.4 FPS) far exceeding playability requirements. The deltaPct values among CPU rivals (all within 0.5%) and GPU rivals (all within 1.4%) indicate that minor component changes would shift the ranking only slightly.

For context, the GPU's 92nd percentile ranking versus the CPU's 78th percentile implies that the RTX 5090 is the primary driver of this combo's high position. Users considering upgrades would likely see diminishing returns from CPU improvements alone, as the data shows GPU-bound behavior at higher resolutions. The 66th rank out of 3,720 combinations represents a strong overall pairing that delivers top-tier performance in Control.

FAQ

Q: Can this system achieve 60 FPS at 4K Ultra settings in Control?

A: Yes. The measured average frame rate at 3840x2160 Ultra is 81.4 FPS, which is 21.4 FPS above the 60 FPS playability threshold. All four presets at 4K exceed 60 FPS, with Low averaging 146.2 FPS, Medium 104.2 FPS, and High 91 FPS.

Q: What is the highest frame rate this combination produces?

A: The maximum average frame rate recorded is 258.6 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings. This represents the least demanding configuration tested and shows the system's ceiling for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p.

Q: How does performance scale between 1080p and 4K?

A: At Ultra settings, performance drops from 158 FPS at 1920x1080 to 119.8 FPS at 2560x1440 (a 24.2% reduction) and further to 81.4 FPS at 3840x2160 (a 48.5% reduction from 1080p). The scaling pattern indicates increasing GPU workload as resolution rises.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this game?

A: At 1080p with lower presets, the CPU plays a more significant role, as evidenced by the smaller percentage performance drop between presets (38.9% from Low to Ultra). At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the dominant factor, with consistent ~44% reductions between Low and Ultra presets.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested configurations?

A: This pairing ranks 66th out of 3,720 tested combinations in Control, placing it in the top 2% of all systems. The RTX 5090's 92nd percentile GPU ranking is the primary contributor to this strong position.

Q: What frame rate can users expect at 1440p with High settings?

A: The measured average is 132.8 FPS at 2560x1440 High settings. This remains well above the 60 FPS threshold and provides a smooth experience for most displays, while also leaving headroom for demanding scenes.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the most demanding option that maintains at least 60 FPS, achieving an average of 158 FPS. This provides maximum visual quality while still delivering frame rates suitable for high-refresh-rate displays. Users could potentially exceed 200 FPS by dropping to Medium (201.2 FPS) or Low (258.6 FPS), but Ultra offers the best visual experience without sacrificing playability.

For 2560x1440, Ultra settings again represent the highest quality option above 60 FPS, with an average of 119.8 FPS. This configuration balances the increased resolution's visual demands with smooth performance, remaining nearly double the playability threshold. The 119.8 FPS result also supports 120 Hz displays, making 1440p Ultra an excellent choice for users with high refresh rate monitors.

At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset achieves 81.4 FPS, clearing the 60 FPS threshold with a 21.4 FPS margin. This is the most demanding configuration in the dataset and represents the system's performance limit while maintaining playability. Users prioritizing higher frame rates at 4K could select High (91 FPS) or Medium (104.2 FPS) for additional headroom, though Ultra remains fully playable. The 81.4 FPS result at 4K Ultra confirms this system can run Control at maximum settings across all resolutions tested.