Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Control
Action Adventure 2019

Control

61%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
115 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
68 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
86 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
50 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
59 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
35 FPS
12.8ms Frame Time
19ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,485
Your CPU 26,324
Graphics Card
Required 27,787
Your GPU 16,129

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 35 36 43 59
1440p QHD 50 55 67 86
1080p Full HD 68 78 83 115

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 78
1920x1080 Low 115
1920x1080 Medium 83
1920x1080 Ultra 68
2560x1440 High 55
2560x1440 Low 86
2560x1440 Medium 67
2560x1440 Ultra 50
3840x2160 High 36
3840x2160 Low 59
3840x2160 Medium 43
3840x2160 Ultra 35

Performance Analysis: Control on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti combination delivers a smooth Control experience at 1920x1080 across all settings and at 2560x1440 on Medium and Low presets, but falls short of 60 FPS at 3840x2160. The data shows this pair offers excellent performance for high-refresh 1080p gaming and a solid 1440p experience, though the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions and graphical presets.

FAQ

*Q: Can this PC run Control at 1920x1080 on Ultra settings?*

A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 1920x1080 on Ultra settings is 67.6, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. This makes 1080p Ultra fully playable with headroom above the target.

Q: What is the best playable setting at 2560x1440?

A: Medium settings provide the highest visual quality while remaining playable. The measured average FPS is 66.9, well above the 60 FPS threshold. High and Ultra settings at this resolution average 55.0 and 50.4 FPS respectively, meaning they fall short of consistent 60 FPS gameplay.

Q: Is 3840x2160 (4K) playable with any settings?

A: No. None of the tested presets at 3840x2160 reach the 60 FPS playable threshold. The best result is at Low settings with an average of 59.4 FPS, which technically misses the mark. Medium averages 43.2 FPS, High averages 36.3 FPS, and Ultra averages 35.1 FPS.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7600 compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 7600 sits within 0.5% of its nearest rivals. It is 0.2% faster than the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, 0.4% faster than the Intel Core i9-11900KF, and 0.5% faster than the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U. It trails the AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS by a mere 0.3%. In practical terms, all four CPUs deliver nearly identical application performance.

Q: How does the RTX 3060 Ti rank against its GPU rivals?

A: The RTX 3060 Ti performs within 1.7% of its nearest competitors. It is 0.7% faster than an AMD Radeon RX 9060, and 1.7% faster than an AMD Radeon R9 370X. It is 1.4% slower than both an AMD Radeon Pro 5600M and an AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT. These deltas are small enough that real-world gaming differences are negligible.

Q: What overall combo rank does this system hold?

A: Among 3720 tested CPU and GPU combinations running Control, this AMD Ryzen 5 7600 + RTX 3060 Ti pairing ranks 2592nd. This places it in the middle tier of tested configurations.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance scaling across resolutions and presets reveals a clear GPU-bound scenario in Control. At 1920x1080, the RTX 3060 Ti is the decisive factor: moving from Low to Ultra settings drops average FPS from 115.3 down to 67.6, a 41% reduction driven entirely by GPU load. The CPU, a 6-core 12-thread Zen 4 part with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, has ample headroom at this resolution to feed frames without bottlenecking.

At 2560x1440, the GPU load intensifies. Compared to 1080p, the average FPS at Medium settings falls from 82.6 to 66.9. At Ultra, the drop is steeper: from 67.6 at 1080p to 50.4 at 1440p. This 25% reduction in FPS moving from 1080p Ultra to 1440p Ultra directly reflects the increased pixel count burdening the RTX 3060 Ti’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and its 448.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Ryzen 5 7600 remains underutilized here, as its DDR5 memory support and 32 MB L3 cache are more than sufficient for the game's physics and AI workloads.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the overwhelming bottleneck. Average FPS at High settings is 36.3, and even Low settings only reach 59.4 — still below the 60 FPS threshold. The 4K resolution demands significantly more shading and rasterization work from the RTX 3060 Ti’s 4864 shading units and 80 ROPs, and the data shows the card simply lacks the throughput for sustained 60 FPS at any preset. The CPU plays a minimal role here; a faster GPU would yield far greater gains than any CPU upgrade.

Across all presets, the pattern is consistent: the RTX 3060 Ti dictates performance, while the Ryzen 5 7600 provides stable frame delivery without introducing CPU-side stutter or limitations.

Similar Performance Alternatives

If this specific CPU or GPU is unavailable, several alternatives will produce near-identical performance in Control. On the CPU side, the data shows four rivals within 0.5% of the Ryzen 5 7600’s average benchmark score of 26324. The AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (score 26274, 0.2% slower) and Intel Core i9-11900KF (score 26212, 0.4% slower) are effective substitutes in gaming scenarios. The AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS (26402, 0.3% faster) and AMD Ryzen 5 8540U (26187, 0.5% slower) also fall within this tight performance band. In practice, swapping to any of these will produce FPS differences under 1%, imperceptible in real gameplay.

For the GPU, the RTX 3060 Ti’s nearest rivals offer almost identical frame rates. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 (average score 16014, 0.7% slower) will trail by a fraction of a percent. The AMD Radeon Pro 5600M (16351, 1.4% faster) and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (16361, 1.4% faster) will produce roughly one additional frame per second in most scenarios. The AMD Radeon R9 370X (15862, 1.7% slower) is the weak link here but still close enough that the difference would be hard to notice without a frame counter. Any of these cards paired with the Ryzen 5 7600 (or one of its CPU rivals) will yield a very similar experience in Control.

The Verdict

This PC can run Control successfully at both 1920x1080 and 2560x1440, but the results depend heavily on settings. At 3840x2160, no preset reaches the 60 FPS playable threshold, so 4K gaming is not viable with this combination.

For 1920x1080, the verdict is clear: all four tested presets — Low (115.3 FPS), Medium (82.6 FPS), High (78.0 FPS), and Ultra (67.6 FPS) — are playable. The best visual experience is on Ultra settings, where the average of 67.6 FPS leaves margin for dips while still clearing 60 FPS comfortably.

At 2560x1440, the playable settings are Medium and Low. Medium settings deliver the best visual quality at a playable 66.9 FPS average. High (55.0 FPS) and Ultra (50.4 FPS) both fall short of the 60 FPS target, so these presets are not recommended for smooth gameplay. For the best experience at this resolution, run Medium settings — the measured performance provides a steady frame rate without dropping below the target.

For 3840x2160, the verdict is definitive: this combination does not deliver 60 FPS at any preset. The closest result is Low at 59.4 FPS, which is below the threshold. Users seeking 4K 60 FPS in Control would need a more powerful GPU.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the measured average FPS spans a wide range. Low settings produce 115.3 FPS average. Medium settings average 82.6 FPS. High settings average 78.0 FPS. Ultra settings average 67.6 FPS. All presets exceed the 60 FPS playable threshold, giving users full freedom to prioritize visuals or frame rate.

At 2560x1440, the averages narrow. Low settings deliver 86.3 FPS. Medium settings average 66.9 FPS. High settings average 55.0 FPS. Ultra settings average 50.4 FPS. Only Low and Medium clear the 60 FPS line. The drop from 1080p to 1440p on Ultra — from 67.6 to 50.4 — represents a 25% performance penalty from the increased resolution.

At 3840x2160, performance is further constrained. Low settings average 59.4 FPS, just below the target. Medium averages 43.2 FPS. High averages 36.3 FPS. Ultra averages 35.1 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows consistent, steep drops as GPU fill-rate and memory bandwidth become limiting factors. No min or max FPS data is available for any preset, so the analysis relies solely on average values.

How This Combo Ranks

Among 3720 distinct CPU and GPU combinations tested in Control, this AMD Ryzen 5 7600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti pairing ranks 2592nd. This places it in the 30th percentile of all tested combos. The ranking reflects the GPU’s mid-range standing — the RTX 3060 Ti sits at the 59th percentile among all GPUs, while the Ryzen 5 7600 is stronger at the 78th percentile among all CPUs. The combination is well-balanced for 1080p and medium-to-high 1440p gaming, but the GPU holds the system back from higher ranks that would require a card with more shading units or faster memory. The rank of 2592 out of 3720 is consistent with a mid-tier 1440p capable system that cannot sustain 4K 60 FPS.