Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Control
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 28 | 32 | 36 | 51 |
| 1440p QHD | 42 | 48 | 54 | 76 |
| 1080p Full HD | 55 | 63 | 71 | 101 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Control on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 paired with the Intel Arc B570 delivers a playable Control experience only at 1080p and 1440p, with 4K remaining out of reach. At 1920x1080, the combo clears the 60 FPS threshold at High, Medium, and Low settings, with the High preset averaging 63 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440, only the Low preset maintains 60+ FPS, averaging 76 FPS. At 3840x2160, no settings preset reaches the 60 FPS playable threshold; the best result is 51 FPS on Low. The system ranks 2995th out of 3720 tested combos for this title, placing it in the lower-middle tier of tested hardware configurations.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the Ryzen 5 7600 + Arc B570 combination shows a clear performance curve across presets. The Low preset delivers the highest average at 101 FPS, while Medium averages 71 FPS with a minimum of 61 FPS and maximum of 82 FPS. High settings average 63 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS playable threshold. Ultra settings drop to 55 FPS average, falling below the playable mark. The data indicates that High is the most demanding preset that remains playable at this resolution, with a 8 FPS margin above the threshold.
At 2560x1440, performance degrades noticeably. Low settings average 76 FPS, maintaining a comfortable margin above 60 FPS. Medium settings average 54 FPS, with a minimum of 46 FPS and maximum of 62 FPS — the average falls short of playable, though occasional peaks cross the line. High settings average 48 FPS, and Ultra drops to 42 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is substantial at 22 FPS, suggesting that the Arc B570's memory bandwidth or compute resources are strained by the increased pixel count at medium-quality assets.
At 3840x2160, the combination struggles across all presets. Low settings produce 51 FPS average, the only 4K result above 50 FPS. Medium averages 36 FPS with a minimum of 31 FPS and maximum of 42 FPS. High settings average 32 FPS, and Ultra averages 28 FPS. None of these results approach the 60 FPS playable threshold; the best 4K outcome is nearly 15% below playable, indicating that 4K requires substantial settings compromises or hardware upgrades.
The measured data shows a consistent pattern: each resolution step down from 4K to 1440p to 1080p yields roughly a 50% improvement in average FPS at equivalent settings. For instance, High settings go from 32 FPS at 4K to 48 FPS at 1440p to 63 FPS at 1080p. This scaling suggests the Arc B570 is the primary bottleneck, as the Ryzen 5 7600's single-thread performance (999 in 3dmark single-thread, 3910 in passmark single-thread) is unlikely to limit at these frame rates.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Control at 60 FPS on a 1080p monitor?
A: Yes, at 1080p the combination achieves 60+ FPS on High (63 FPS), Medium (71 FPS), and Low (101 FPS) presets. Only Ultra settings fall below the threshold at 55 FPS.
Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming?
A: Low is the only playable preset at 2560x1440, averaging 76 FPS. Medium drops to 54 FPS average, which fails the 60 FPS playable criterion.
Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this hardware?
A: No. At 3840x2160, even Low settings only reach 51 FPS average. Medium, High, and Ultra all fall below 40 FPS, making 4K unplayable by the 60 FPS standard.
Q: How does the Arc B570 compare to its nearest GPU rivals in overall benchmark scores?
A: The Arc B570 scores 20556 average, which is 0.1% lower than the Intel Arc A750 (20582) and 0.1% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20534). This places it statistically tied with those GPUs in aggregate benchmarks.
Q: Does the Ryzen 5 7600 bottleneck the Arc B570 in this game?
A: The data does not indicate a CPU bottleneck. The 7600's nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, scores within 0.2% (26274 vs 26324), and the FPS scaling across resolutions follows GPU-typical patterns, suggesting the GPU is the performance limiter.
Q: What is the expected frame time consistency at playable settings?
A: At 1080p Medium, the minimum FPS is 61 and maximum is 82, showing a 21 FPS spread. At 1440p Medium, the spread is wider (46 to 62 FPS), indicating less consistent frame pacing at higher resolutions.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The CPU's benchmark profile places it between several close rivals. The AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX scores 26274, just 0.2% lower than the Ryzen 5 7600's 26324. The AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS scores 26402, which is 0.3% higher. The Intel Core i9-11900KF scores 26212, 0.4% lower. The AMD Ryzen 5 8540U scores 26187, 0.5% lower. In practical terms, any of these CPUs would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Control, with differences well under 1% in synthetic benchmarks.
For the GPU side, the Intel Arc A750 is the closest match, with an average score of 20582 versus the Arc B570's 20556 — a 0.1% difference. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534, within 0.1% of the B570. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20480, 0.4% lower, and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20662, 0.5% higher. These rivals would produce nearly identical FPS results in Control, meaning users with an RTX 3070 Mobile or Arc A750 should expect the same playable settings tiers: 1080p High, 1440p Low, and no 4K.
The combination of a CPU in the 26187-26402 score range with a GPU in the 20480-20662 range represents a balanced mid-range pairing. The CPU's 78th percentile ranking among all CPUs (compared to the GPU's 65th percentile among all GPUs) suggests the processor has more headroom than the graphics card in this pairing, reinforcing that GPU-side upgrades would yield larger FPS gains in Control.
The Verdict
The Ryzen 5 7600 + Intel Arc B570 can run Control at playable frame rates, but with significant restrictions based on resolution. At 1920x1080, the system clears 60 FPS on High settings (63 FPS average), which is the recommended target for most players. Medium (71 FPS) and Low (101 FPS) also qualify. Ultra settings fail at 55 FPS. At 2560x1440, only Low settings achieve playable status, averaging 76 FPS. Medium falls short at 54 FPS, and High/Ultra are not viable. At 3840x2160, no preset reaches 60 FPS; the best result is Low at 51 FPS, which fails the playability test by 9 FPS.
The verdict is clear: this is a 1080p gaming system for Control, with 1440p possible only at the lowest visual quality. The 4K resolution is not recommended for this title with this hardware.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination ranks 2995th out of 3720 tested combos for Control, placing it in the 20th percentile of all tested hardware configurations. This ranking reflects that the majority of tested systems outperform this pairing in this specific game. The rank is influenced primarily by the Arc B570's 65th percentile GPU ranking, while the CPU's 78th percentile ranking is comparatively stronger. The delta between the CPU and GPU percentiles suggests that the graphics card is the limiting factor in this pairing's overall game performance ranking. For context, a combo ranking near the 3000th position indicates that roughly 80% of tested systems deliver higher frame rates in Control, making this configuration suitable for budget-conscious 1080p gaming but not competitive with higher-tier hardware.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, with an average of 63 FPS. This provides the best visual quality while maintaining playability, with a narrow 3 FPS margin above the threshold. Medium averages 71 FPS for users who prefer extra headroom, and Low averages 101 FPS for maximum smoothness.
At 2560x1440, the only preset meeting the 60 FPS requirement is Low, averaging 76 FPS. This represents the maximum visual quality available at this resolution while maintaining playable performance. Medium falls below the threshold at 54 FPS, so users seeking higher quality at 1440p would need to accept sub-60 FPS performance.
At 3840x2160, no preset achieves 60 FPS. The closest is Low at 51 FPS, which fails the playability standard. Users attempting 4K on this hardware should either reduce resolution to 1440p or accept frame rates below the playable threshold.