Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Control
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 28 | 32 | 36 | 51 |
| 1440p QHD | 42 | 48 | 54 | 76 |
| 1080p Full HD | 55 | 63 | 71 | 101 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Control on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D and Intel Arc B570 combination delivers a playable experience in Control only at 1080p and 1440p, with 4K remaining out of reach. Benchmark data shows the combo ranks 2995 out of 3720 tested configurations, placing it in the lower-mid tier of systems for this title. The pairing is competent but not overpowering, with performance scaling predictably as resolution and settings increase.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo's rank of 2995 out of 3720 tested combinations puts it roughly in the 20th percentile of all systems tested for Control. This is a modest standing, reflecting the Arc B570's mid-range positioning rather than any CPU limitation. The Ryzen 5 7500X3D sits in the 89th percentile among all CPUs, while the Arc B570 lands in the 65th percentile among all GPUs, so the GPU is the clear bottleneck in this pairing.
The data indicates that this system is not designed for maximum fidelity or high-refresh 4K gaming in Control. Instead, it occupies a practical space: capable of smooth 1080p gameplay at high settings and 1440p at low settings. The rank suggests that many other tested combinations deliver higher frame rates, but this combo remains functional for the game's core experience. The 3720 tested combos span a wide range of hardware, and this pairing's position reflects a balanced but not exceptional outcome.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160 (4K), no preset reaches the 60 FPS playable threshold. The best result is Low settings at 51 FPS average, which falls short of the target. Medium produces 36 FPS, High drops to 32 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 28 FPS. None of these are viable for smooth gameplay, so the verdict for 4K is no playable settings.
At 2560x1440 (1440p), only Low settings achieve playability, with an average of 76 FPS. This is the sole preset above the 60 FPS threshold. Medium sits at 54 FPS, High at 48 FPS, and Ultra at 42 FPS, all below the playable mark. The recommended setting is Low, which delivers a comfortable margin above 60 FPS while maintaining acceptable visual quality for the resolution.
At 1920x1080 (1080p), three presets are playable: High at 63 FPS, Medium at 71 FPS, and Low at 101 FPS. Ultra falls short at 55 FPS. The best playable setting is High, which meets the 60 FPS threshold with a small 3 FPS buffer. This is the recommended configuration for the smoothest experience at 1080p, balancing visual quality and performance.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals a clear shift in component importance as resolution changes. At 1080p, the GPU is the primary limiter, as evidenced by the large FPS spread across presets: from 101 FPS at Low to 55 FPS at Ultra. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking suggests it has ample headroom, but the Arc B570's 65th percentile standing constrains results. The 63 FPS average at High settings indicates the GPU is working near its limit.
At 1440p, GPU pressure intensifies. The FPS range narrows from 76 FPS at Low to 42 FPS at Ultra, showing that even the lowest preset demands significant GPU resources. The CPU's role diminishes further, as the system becomes increasingly GPU-bound. The 76 FPS at Low versus 54 FPS at Medium demonstrates that the GPU's performance scaling is steep, with each settings tier costing roughly 15-20% performance.
At 4K, the GPU is overwhelmingly dominant. The FPS range compresses to 28-51 FPS across all presets, with even Low settings failing to reach 60 FPS. This indicates the Arc B570 lacks the raw throughput for 4K in Control, regardless of CPU capability. The 51 FPS at Low versus 28 FPS at Ultra shows a 45% performance drop from minimal to maximal settings, highlighting the GPU's limited headroom at this resolution.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The Ryzen 5 7500X3D's nearest rivals, based on average benchmark scores, include the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H with a score of 44466 (0.2% higher), the Intel Core i9-13950HX at 44342 (0.5% higher), and the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 at 44309 (0.6% higher). The Intel Core i5-14600 scores 44889, which is 0.7% lower. These processors would deliver near-identical CPU performance in Control, meaning the GPU would remain the limiting factor in most scenarios.
For the Intel Arc B570, the nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile with a score of 20534 (0.1% higher), the Intel Arc A750 at 20582 (0.1% lower), the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M at 20480 (0.4% higher), and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X at 20662 (0.5% lower). Substituting any of these GPUs would produce similar frame rates in Control, with differences likely within a few FPS. The Arc A750 is particularly noteworthy as a direct competitor, given its near-identical benchmark score.
Measured FPS Breakdown
3840x2160 (4K):
- Low: 51 FPS average
- Medium: 36 FPS average, 31 FPS minimum, 42 FPS maximum
- High: 32 FPS average
- Ultra: 28 FPS average
2560x1440 (1440p):
- Low: 76 FPS average
- Medium: 54 FPS average, 46 FPS minimum, 62 FPS maximum
- High: 48 FPS average
- Ultra: 42 FPS average
1920x1080 (1080p):
- Low: 101 FPS average
- Medium: 71 FPS average, 61 FPS minimum, 82 FPS maximum
- High: 63 FPS average
- Ultra: 55 FPS average
The minimum FPS data is only available for Medium settings across all resolutions. At 4K Medium, the 31 FPS minimum shows occasional dips below the average, while at 1440p Medium the minimum of 46 FPS stays closer to the average. At 1080p Medium, the 61 FPS minimum stays above the playable threshold, indicating stable performance. The lack of min/max data for other presets limits deeper analysis, but the averages provide a reliable baseline.
FAQ
Q: Can this combo run Control at 4K?
A: No. All presets at 3840x2160 fall below the 60 FPS threshold. The best result is Low settings at 51 FPS average, which is still 9 FPS short of playable.
Q: What is the best settings preset for 1080p?
A: High settings at 1920x1080 delivers 63 FPS average, which is the highest playable preset. Medium runs at 71 FPS and Low at 101 FPS, but High offers the best visual quality while staying above 60 FPS.
Q: Which component is the bottleneck in this system?
A: The GPU. The Intel Arc B570 ranks in the 65th percentile among all GPUs, while the Ryzen 5 7500X3D ranks in the 89th percentile among CPUs. FPS scaling across resolutions and presets confirms the GPU limits performance.
Q: How does the Arc B570 compare to the Arc A750 in this game?
A: They are nearly identical. The Arc A750 has an average benchmark score of 20582 versus the Arc B570's 20556, a difference of just 0.1%. Expect similar frame rates in Control.
Q: Is the Ryzen 5 7500X3D holding back the GPU?
A: No. The CPU's benchmark scores place it well above the GPU's performance tier, and the FPS patterns across resolutions indicate the GPU is the limiting factor at all settings.
Q: What is the playable settings situation at 1440p?
A: Only Low settings are playable at 2560x1440, with an average of 76 FPS. Medium drops to 54 FPS, High to 48 FPS, and Ultra to 42 FPS, all below the 60 FPS threshold.