Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Control
Action Adventure 2019

Control

83%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
258 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
143 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
200 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
112 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
132 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
71 FPS
6.1ms Frame Time
9ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,485
Your CPU 24,964
Graphics Card
Required 27,787
Your GPU 56,083

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 71 82 96 132
1440p QHD 112 127 143 200
1080p Full HD 143 164 186 258

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 164
1920x1080 Low 258
1920x1080 Medium 186
1920x1080 Ultra 143
2560x1440 High 127
2560x1440 Low 200
2560x1440 Medium 143
2560x1440 Ultra 112
3840x2160 High 82
3840x2160 Low 132
3840x2160 Medium 96
3840x2160 Ultra 71

Performance Analysis: Control on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 delivers a decisive performance profile in Control, a 2019 Action Adventure title. Measured data shows this combination produces exceptionally high frame rates across all tested resolutions and presets, with the only question being how far the visual quality ceiling can be pushed before frame rates dip below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The data presents a clear picture of a system that has significant headroom, even at 4K.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the RTX 5080 and Ryzen 5 7500F combination shows a clear scaling pattern tied directly to graphics settings. The average frame rate at Low settings is 132.3 FPS, which drops to 96 FPS at Medium, 82.4 FPS at High, and finally 70.8 FPS at Ultra. This represents a 46.5% reduction in average frame rate from Low to Ultra, indicating that the GPU is the primary driver of performance at this resolution, as the CPU has ample headroom to feed frames.

Moving down to 2560x1440, the performance envelope expands considerably. The Low preset produces an average of 199.9 FPS, while Medium yields 142.8 FPS and High reaches 127 FPS. The Ultra preset still manages a robust 111.5 FPS average. The gap between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 88.4 FPS, showing that the scaling is steep but the absolute numbers remain high enough that even the most demanding settings are never a concern for smooth gameplay.

At 1920x1080, the system truly flexes its muscle. The Low preset averages 257.6 FPS, which is a remarkable figure for a title from this era. Medium settings produce 185.9 FPS, High settings reach 163.8 FPS, and Ultra settings still deliver 142.6 FPS. The relative performance drop from Low to Ultra is less severe in percentage terms than at higher resolutions, suggesting that at 1080p the CPU begins to play a more significant role in limiting the absolute maximum frame rate, though the numbers remain far beyond what any display can likely show.

The data reveals a consistent pattern: the RTX 5080 provides enough raw power to saturate even high-refresh-rate displays at 1440p and 1080p, and it remains comfortably above 60 FPS at 4K Ultra. The absence of min and max FPS values in the dataset means the analysis relies on average frame rates, but the consistency of the scaling suggests stable performance.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU nearest rivals show that the Ryzen 5 7500F sits in a tightly contested performance band. Its average benchmark score of 24964 places it just 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-11850H, which scores 24935. The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is marginally faster at 25005, a 0.2% difference. The Intel Core i7-13620H scores 24911, trailing by 0.2%, and the Intel Core 5 210H at 24872 is 0.4% behind. These deltas are negligible in gaming terms, meaning any of these processors would produce nearly identical frame rates in Control when paired with the same RTX 5080.

On the GPU side, the RTX 5080's nearest rivals present an interesting contrast. The AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55757, which is 0.6% lower than the RTX 5080's 56083 average. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is 0.7% behind with a score of 55698, and the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X trails by 2.3% with 54828. Notably, the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE is ahead by 2.2% with a score of 57367. These performance deltas suggest that swapping the RTX 5080 for any of these alternatives would result in very similar Control frame rates, with the RX 9070 GRE potentially offering a slight edge.

For a user considering this combo, the data implies that the CPU choice has virtually no impact on Control performance, since all nearest rivals are within a fraction of a percent. The GPU choice matters more, but even the closest rival GPUs are so close in score that the gaming experience would be nearly indistinguishable. This makes the RTX 5080 a solid but not uniquely positioned choice within its immediate competitive set.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that maintains an average of at least 60 FPS is Ultra, which achieves exactly 70.8 FPS. This is the clear best option for 4K, as it delivers the highest visual fidelity while still leaving a 10.8 FPS margin above the playable threshold. High settings at 82.4 FPS are also viable, but Ultra is the optimal choice given the headroom.

For 2560x1440, the Ultra preset is again the best selection, with an average of 111.5 FPS. This is far above the 60 FPS threshold, providing ample refresh rate headroom for high-refresh-rate monitors. The gap between Ultra and the next tier down, High at 127 FPS, is only 15.5 FPS, but Ultra is the obvious pick for maximum quality.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset delivers 142.6 FPS, which is the best of all tested settings at this resolution. This is the definitive choice, as it offers the highest visual settings while still maintaining a frame rate that exceeds the refresh rate of most standard 1080p displays. The data shows no reason to compromise on settings at this resolution, as even the most demanding preset is far beyond the playable threshold.

The Verdict

The verdict is unambiguous: this PC can run Control exceptionally well at every tested resolution and preset. According to the verdict by resolution, all four settings presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—are playable at all three resolutions. The playable threshold is 60 FPS, and the lowest average frame rate recorded across the entire dataset is 70.8 FPS at 4K Ultra.

At 3840x2160, the best settings are Ultra with an average of 70.8 FPS, which clears the threshold by a comfortable margin. At 2560x1440, Ultra delivers 111.5 FPS, and at 1920x1080, Ultra produces 142.6 FPS. The system never struggles to maintain smooth gameplay, regardless of how aggressively the graphics options are pushed. The data indicates that this combination is overkill for Control at 1080p and 1440p, and it is only at 4K Ultra that the GPU begins to approach its limits, yet it still succeeds.

The conclusion is that the Ryzen 5 7500F and RTX 5080 provide a gaming experience that is not merely playable but overwhelmingly so. Users can crank every setting to maximum and enjoy the game without any performance compromises, even at the highest resolution tested.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals a nuanced division of labor between the CPU and GPU across resolutions. At 3840x2160, the frame rate drops significantly from Low to Ultra, from 132.3 FPS to 70.8 FPS. This 46.5% decrease is driven almost entirely by GPU load, as the higher pixel count and more complex shading demand more from the graphics card. The CPU has more than enough capacity to feed the GPU at this resolution, so the GPU is the clear bottleneck and the primary determinant of performance.

At 2560x1440, the scaling pattern is similar but with higher absolute values. The difference between Low at 199.9 FPS and Ultra at 111.5 FPS is 88.4 FPS, which is a larger absolute gap than at 4K. This indicates that the GPU is still the limiting factor, but the CPU is beginning to exert more influence as frame rates climb. The Ryzen 5 7500F's 6-core, 12-thread configuration with a 5.00 GHz boost clock is sufficient to keep up, but the headroom narrows.

At 1920x1080, the pattern shifts. The frame rate at Low is 257.6 FPS, which is exceptionally high. The drop to Ultra at 142.6 FPS represents a 44.6% reduction. However, the fact that the Low preset cannot break far beyond 257.6 FPS suggests that the CPU is starting to cap the maximum frame rate. The GPU is still the dominant factor, but the CPU's role becomes more prominent at lower resolutions where the GPU has less work to do per frame. The CPU's single-thread score of 974 in 3DMark and 3218 in Cinebench R23 indicates strong per-core performance, but even the best CPUs will eventually limit frame rates in less demanding scenes.

The scaling between resolutions confirms this interpretation. At Ultra settings, the frame rate drops from 142.6 FPS at 1080p to 111.5 FPS at 1440p and 70.8 FPS at 4K. This 50.3% decline from 1080p to 4K is consistent with a GPU-bound scenario. The data shows that for Control, the GPU matters most at all resolutions, but the CPU becomes a more meaningful consideration at 1080p when chasing extremely high frame rates.

FAQ

*Q: Can this system run Control at 4K with all settings maxed out?*

A: Yes, the measured average frame rate at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 70.8 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the highest preset that maintains above 60 FPS at 2560x1440?

A: All presets are playable, but Ultra is the best option with an average of 111.5 FPS.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7500F compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500F scores 24964, which is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-11850H and 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F.

Q: Is the RTX 5080 significantly faster than its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The RTX 5080 scores 56083, which is 0.6% higher than the AMD Radeon 8060S and 2.2% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE.

Q: What is the best setting for 1920x1080 to maximize visual quality?

A: Ultra settings deliver an average of 142.6 FPS, which is the highest quality preset tested and well above 60 FPS.

Q: Does the CPU bottleneck the GPU at any resolution?

A: At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the average is 257.6 FPS, suggesting the CPU may limit the absolute maximum frame rate, but at playable presets the GPU remains the primary factor.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 combination ranks 181st out of 3720 tested combos in Control. This places it in the top 4.9% of all configurations in the database, which is a strong showing given the sheer number of possible hardware pairings. The rank reflects the system's ability to deliver high frame rates across all resolutions, with the 4K Ultra average of 70.8 FPS being a particularly notable achievement.

The high rank is unsurprising given the individual components' performance percentiles. The CPU sits in the 77th percentile of all CPUs, and the GPU is in the 87th percentile of all GPUs. When combined, they produce a system that is consistently above 60 FPS even at the most demanding settings. The rank of 181 implies that a small number of combinations—likely those with even more powerful GPUs or CPUs—can outperform this setup, but for the vast majority of systems, this pairing is significantly faster.

The data indicates that the RTX 5080 is the main driver of this high rank, as its 87th percentile GPU score is the stronger of the two components. The CPU's 77th percentile is respectable but not elite, yet it does not hold the system back in this title. Overall, this combo is a top-tier performer for Control, offering an experience that few systems can match.