Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Control
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 43 | 51 | 58 | 80 |
| 1440p QHD | 68 | 75 | 85 | 119 |
| 1080p Full HD | 86 | 103 | 115 | 157 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Control on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 delivers a strong Control experience, but 4K gaming demands significant settings compromises. At 2560x1440 and 1920x1080, this combination provides a fully playable experience at the highest preset, with average frame rates of 68 FPS and 86.2 FPS respectively. The data indicates that 3840x2160 is the only resolution where the Ultra preset falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold, requiring a drop to Low settings to maintain smooth gameplay. This is a capable pairing that excels at high-refresh 1080p and 1440p gaming, while 4K users will need to prioritize frame rate over visual fidelity.
Best Settings per Resolution
For each resolution, the most demanding preset that maintains an average of at least 60 FPS is identified. The playable threshold is defined as 60 FPS.
At 3840x2160, the only preset that clears the 60 FPS bar is Low, which delivers an average of 79.5 FPS. The Medium preset falls short at 57.9 FPS, and High is further behind at 51.3 FPS. The Ultra preset is not viable at this resolution, producing only 42.9 FPS. This is a significant compromise, as the visual quality drop from Ultra to Low is substantial, but it is the only way to achieve smooth gameplay at 4K with this hardware.
At 2560x1440, the situation improves dramatically. All four presets — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — achieve an average of at least 60 FPS. The most demanding preset that remains playable is Ultra, which averages 68 FPS. This is the optimal choice for 1440p, as it provides the full visual experience while still maintaining a comfortable margin above the playable threshold. The High preset offers 75.4 FPS, and Medium reaches 84.5 FPS, providing headroom for those who prefer higher frame rates.
At 1920x1080, the combination is thoroughly capable. All presets are playable, and the most demanding option, Ultra, achieves an average of 86.2 FPS. This makes 1080p the resolution where the user can enable every setting without concern. The High preset at 102.6 FPS and Medium at 115.2 FPS offer even more performance for high-refresh-rate displays. The Low preset, at 157.4 FPS, is for those seeking maximum frame rates.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark data reveals how the balance of CPU and GPU workload shifts across resolutions and presets. This is a GPU-bound title at higher settings, but the CPU becomes more relevant as resolution drops.
Looking at the scaling from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160 at the Ultra preset, the average frame rate drops from 86.2 FPS to 42.9 FPS. This is a reduction of roughly 50% when the pixel count quadruples, indicating that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at 4K. The RTX 3070 is being pushed to its limits, and the CPU has ample headroom to feed it.
The opposite is true at lower resolutions and settings. At the Low preset, the frame rate scales from 157.4 FPS at 1080p to 119 FPS at 1440p and 79.5 FPS at 4K. The gap between 1080p and 1440p is relatively small, suggesting that at 1080p Low, the CPU is starting to limit performance. The Ryzen 5 7500F, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, is a strong processor, but the data shows that the GPU is the dominant factor in most scenarios.
The difference between Low and Ultra presets at a single resolution also highlights the GPU's role. At 1920x1080, the gap is 71.2 FPS (157.4 vs 86.2). At 2560x1440, the gap is 51 FPS (119 vs 68). At 3840x2160, the gap narrows to 36.6 FPS (79.5 vs 42.9). As resolution increases, the cost of higher settings in absolute FPS terms becomes smaller, but the relative cost remains substantial. This pattern confirms that the RTX 3070 is the deciding factor for performance in Control, with the CPU providing sufficient support to avoid major bottlenecks at most settings.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The following data represents the measured average frame rates for each resolution and settings combination. Minimum and maximum FPS values were not available in the dataset.
At 1920x1080, the performance envelope is wide. The Low preset delivers the highest average at 157.4 FPS. Moving to Medium reduces the average to 115.2 FPS, a drop of 42.2 FPS. The High preset averages 102.6 FPS, which is 12.6 FPS lower than Medium. The Ultra preset, while still very fast, averages 86.2 FPS, showing a 16.4 FPS cost over High. This scaling shows that each settings tier has a measurable impact on performance at 1080p.
At 2560x1440, the frame rates remain high. The Low preset averages 119 FPS. The Medium preset averages 84.5 FPS, a reduction of 34.5 FPS from Low. The High preset averages 75.4 FPS, which is 9.1 FPS lower than Medium. The Ultra preset averages 68 FPS, representing a 7.4 FPS penalty over High. The relative cost of the Ultra preset is smaller at 1440p than at 1080p, but the absolute performance is still clearly sufficient for smooth gameplay.
At 3840x2160, the performance drops significantly. The Low preset is the only one to exceed 60 FPS, averaging 79.5 FPS. The Medium preset averages 57.9 FPS, just below the playable threshold. The High preset averages 51.3 FPS. The Ultra preset averages 42.9 FPS, which is the lowest score recorded for this combination. The data shows a steep decline from Low to Medium (21.6 FPS), followed by smaller gaps between Medium and High (6.6 FPS) and High to Ultra (8.4 FPS). This indicates that the GPU is severely strained at 4K, and even modest settings increases have a large impact.
The Verdict
The core question is whether this PC can run Control. The data provides a clear answer: yes, but with a major caveat at 4K.
At 1920x1080, the verdict is a definitive yes. All presets, including Ultra, run above 60 FPS. The Ultra preset, with an average of 86.2 FPS, is the recommended setting for this resolution, providing the best visual quality without any performance concerns.
At 2560x1440, the verdict is also a clear yes. The Ultra preset averages 68 FPS, which is above the playable threshold. This resolution offers the best balance of visual fidelity and performance, as the user can enable all settings and still maintain a comfortable frame rate.
At 3840x2160, the verdict is conditional. The only playable preset is Low, which averages 79.5 FPS. This means the game is technically playable at 4K, but the user must sacrifice most graphical features to achieve smooth gameplay. The Medium, High, and Ultra presets all fall below 60 FPS, with Ultra being the least playable at 42.9 FPS. For a game like Control, which features detailed environments and effects, this is a significant compromise.
In summary, this combination is a strong performer for 1080p and 1440p gaming, offering a full Ultra experience. For 4K, it is only suitable for users who prioritize frame rate over visual quality and are willing to play at Low settings.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Examining the nearest rivals for both the CPU and GPU provides context for how this hardware compares to other options.
The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F has an average benchmark score of 24964. Its closest competitor is the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F, which scores 25005, a delta of -0.2%. This indicates the two processors are effectively equal in performance. The Intel Core i7-11850H scores 24935, a delta of 0.1%, and the Intel Core i7-13620H scores 24911, a delta of 0.2%. The Intel Core 5 210H scores 24872, a delta of 0.4%. All four rivals are within a 0.6% performance band, meaning that a user swapping the Ryzen 5 7500F for any of these would see virtually no difference in gaming performance in this title.
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 has an average benchmark score of 17208. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, which scores 17083, a delta of 0.7%. This suggests the RTX 3070 holds a slight edge. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 scores 17037, a delta of 1%, and the AMD Radeon HD 7970M scores 17019, a delta of 1.1%. The NVIDIA Tesla K40c scores 17468, a delta of -1.5%. These alternatives are all very close in aggregate performance, so a system with any of these GPUs would likely produce similar frame rates in Control, though the RTX 3070 appears to have a marginal advantage over most of them.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is ranked 1597th out of 3720 tested combinations for Control. This places it in the upper-middle tier of all possible pairings.
This rank is a reflection of the hardware's overall capabilities. The CPU is a modern 6-core part with strong single-thread performance, and the GPU is a capable mid-range card. The ranking indicates that this system outperforms a majority of other tested configurations, but it is not at the top end. The data suggests that while this combo is well-suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, it will struggle with the most demanding scenarios at 4K, consistent with the measured FPS results. For a user seeking a reliable 60 FPS experience at high settings, this rank confirms that the pairing is a solid, mid-to-high-tier choice.