Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Control
Action Adventure 2019

Control

66%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
101 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
55 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
76 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
42 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
51 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
28 FPS
15.9ms Frame Time
24ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,485
Your CPU 24,964
Graphics Card
Required 27,787
Your GPU 20,556

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 28 32 36 51
1440p QHD 42 48 54 76
1080p Full HD 55 63 71 101

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 63
1920x1080 Low 101
1920x1080 Medium 71
1920x1080 Ultra 55
2560x1440 High 48
2560x1440 Low 76
2560x1440 Medium 54
2560x1440 Ultra 42
3840x2160 High 32
3840x2160 Low 51
3840x2160 Medium 36
3840x2160 Ultra 28

Performance Analysis: Control on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and Intel Arc B570 combination delivers a distinctly resolution-dependent experience in Control. At 1080p, the pairing is comfortably playable across most settings, but the demands of higher resolutions quickly expose the GPU's limitations. The data indicates a clear ceiling: 1440p is only viable at Low settings, while 4K falls short of the 60 FPS target at every preset.

FAQ

*Q: Can this PC run Control at 1920x1080 with High settings?*

A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 1080p High is 63 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Q: What is the best playable preset at 2560x1440?

A: Low is the only setting that maintains 60 FPS at this resolution, achieving an average of 76 FPS. Medium and High fall short at 54 FPS and 48 FPS, respectively.

Q: Is 4K gaming feasible with this hardware?

A: No. At 3840x2160, the highest average FPS recorded is 51 FPS on Low settings, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset yields only 28 FPS.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B570 compare to the Intel Arc A750?

A: The benchmark scores are nearly identical. The Arc B570 has an average benchmark score of 20556, while the Arc A750 scores 20582, a difference of -0.1%.

Q: What is the average FPS range at 1080p Medium?

A: The average FPS is 71, with a minimum of 61 FPS and a maximum of 82 FPS, ensuring a consistent experience above the target frame rate.

*Q: How many total combinations does this setup rank against in Control?*

A: This CPU and GPU combo ranks 2995 out of 3720 tested combinations in the game's benchmark database.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance scaling across resolutions reveals a system that becomes progressively more GPU-bound as resolution increases. At 1920x1080, the gap between Low and Ultra settings is 46 FPS (101 vs 55 FPS), indicating that both the CPU and GPU are actively engaged, with the GPU having enough headroom to respond to settings changes. Moving to 2560x1440, the spread narrows to 34 FPS (76 vs 42 FPS), and at 3840x2160, it further compresses to 23 FPS (51 vs 28 FPS). This compression is a classic sign of the GPU becoming the primary bottleneck; the rendering workload at higher resolutions saturates the Arc B570, leaving the Ryzen 5 7500F's six Zen 4 cores with less influence over the final frame rate.

The Ryzen 5 7500F's strong single-thread performance—a 3DMark single-thread score of 974 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2374—ensures that it does not hold back the GPU at 1080p. However, the data suggests its role diminishes as pixel count rises. At 4K, the difference between Low and High settings is only 19 FPS (51 vs 32 FPS), whereas at 1080p, the same settings gap is 38 FPS. This indicates that at 4K, the GPU's raw shading and rasterization throughput, capped at 11.52 TFLOPS, is the deciding factor, not the CPU's ability to feed it frames. The Arc B570's 10 GB of GDDR6 memory and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p, but the 4K data suggests a hard limit on the GPU's compute capacity.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The benchmark data places the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F in a tight cluster of CPUs with comparable average scores. The Intel Core i7-11850H is nearly identical, with a score of 24935 against the Ryzen's 24964, a delta of just 0.1%. The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is equally close, scoring 25005, which is 0.2% higher. The Intel Core i7-13620H (24911) and Intel Core 5 210H (24872) also fall within a 0.4% margin. For gaming, this means any of these processors would produce nearly indistinguishable frame rates in Control, assuming the same GPU. The choice between them would hinge on platform features rather than raw game performance.

On the GPU side, the Intel Arc B570's average score of 20556 places it alongside several familiar alternatives. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is the closest match, with a score of 20534 (0.1% lower). The Intel Arc A750, a desktop card from the previous generation, scores 20582, a 0.1% difference, indicating the B570 offers a similar level of performance. Interestingly, the list also includes the much older NVIDIA Quadro M4000M and AMD Radeon R9 M390X, which score 20480 and 20662, respectively. While these are not modern gaming GPUs, the benchmark scores suggest that in Control, the Arc B570 would deliver frame rates consistent with these parts, though driver support and feature sets differ significantly.

The Verdict

The verdict is clear: this PC can run Control, but the definition of "run" depends entirely on the target resolution. At 1920x1080, the system is fully playable across three of the four presets. The data shows that High settings achieve 63 FPS, Medium hits 71 FPS, and Low reaches 101 FPS. Only Ultra falls below the 60 FPS line at 55 FPS. For 2560x1440, the options narrow drastically. The verdict data lists only Low as a playable setting, with an average of 76 FPS. High (48 FPS) and Medium (54 FPS) are not viable. At 3840x2160, the system cannot achieve 60 FPS at any settings preset. The best case is Low at 51 FPS, followed by Medium at 36 FPS, High at 32 FPS, and Ultra at 28 FPS. Therefore, for a 60 FPS experience, the user must stay at 1080p or drop to Low quality at 1440p.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a detailed view of performance across all tested configurations. At 1920x1080, the results are as follows:

  • Low: 101 FPS average.
  • Medium: 71 FPS average, with a minimum of 61 FPS and a maximum of 82 FPS.
  • High: 63 FPS average.
  • Ultra: 55 FPS average.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates drop significantly:

  • Low: 76 FPS average.
  • Medium: 54 FPS average, with a minimum of 46 FPS and a maximum of 62 FPS.
  • High: 48 FPS average.
  • Ultra: 42 FPS average.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles to maintain playable frame rates:

  • Low: 51 FPS average.
  • Medium: 36 FPS average, with a minimum of 31 FPS and a maximum of 42 FPS.
  • High: 32 FPS average.
  • Ultra: 28 FPS average.

The data shows a consistent pattern of diminishing returns as resolution increases. For instance, the jump from 1080p Medium to 1440p Medium results in a 17 FPS loss (71 to 54 FPS), while the jump from 1440p Medium to 4K Medium results in an 18 FPS loss (54 to 36 FPS). This linear degradation underscores the GPU's limited headroom at higher pixel counts.

How This Combo Ranks

In the benchmark database for Control, this specific configuration of an AMD Ryzen 5 7500F paired with an Intel Arc B570 ranks 2995 out of 3720 tested combinations. This places it in the lower half of all systems tested, which is consistent with the measured FPS data showing it is not a high-end performer. The 19th percentile ranking (calculated from 2995/3720) indicates that a significant majority of tested hardware combinations deliver higher average frame rates. This ranking is heavily influenced by the GPU's mid-tier position, as the Arc B570's percentileVsAllGpus is 65, meaning it outperforms 65% of all GPUs, but the CPU's percentileVsAllCpus is 77. The combination of a strong CPU with a mid-range GPU results in a system that is often limited by graphics performance, particularly at higher resolutions where the GPU's 65th percentile standing is not sufficient to maintain high frame rates.

Best Settings per Resolution

Based on the verdict data and the measured FPS, the optimal settings for each resolution are as follows:

  • 1920x1080: The best preset that remains at or above 60 FPS is High, with an average of 63 FPS. This provides the highest visual quality while maintaining playability. Medium (71 FPS) and Low (101 FPS) are also viable, but High offers the best balance of fidelity and performance.
  • 2560x1440: The only playable preset is Low, achieving an average of 76 FPS. While this is well above the 60 FPS threshold, it requires a significant reduction in visual quality. Medium (54 FPS) and High (48 FPS) are not recommended as they fall below the target.
  • 3840x2160: No settings preset achieves the 60 FPS threshold. The best average FPS is 51 on Low, which is still below playable. The system is not recommended for 4K gaming in Control without further compromises, such as resolution scaling, which are not represented in this data.

In summary, the Ryzen 5 7500F and Arc B570 combination is a capable 1080p gaming platform for Control, offering a smooth experience at High settings. Users with 1440p monitors can still enjoy the game at Low quality, but those seeking 4K performance will need to consider a more powerful GPU.