Control

Control is a demanding action-adventure title that stresses both the CPU and GPU, and the recorded data for the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 shows a system that scales predictably with resolution and settings. The benchmark results indicate that this combination is capable of delivering a smooth experience at 1080p and 1440p, but it struggles to maintain high frame rates at 4K. The measurements provide a clear picture of where this hardware excels and where its limits are reached, making it a versatile option for gamers targeting mainstream resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this combo spans three resolutions and four settings presets, providing a comprehensive view of performance. At 3840x2160 (4K), the results are the most constrained. With the Ultra preset, the average frame rate drops to 35 FPS, which is well below the playable threshold. High settings at 4K improve the average to 40 FPS, but this remains insufficient for smooth gameplay. The Medium preset at 4K records an average of 45 FPS, with a minimum of 38 FPS and a maximum of 52 FPS, indicating noticeable frame dips during intense scenes. The only 4K setting that clears the 60 FPS barrier is Low, which achieves an average of 63 FPS.

Moving down to 2560x1440 (1440p), the performance becomes more viable. The Ultra preset here yields an average of 52 FPS, still short of the target. High settings at 1440p produce an average of 59 FPS, just one frame below the threshold, which suggests that minor tweaks could push it over. The Medium preset delivers a solid 67 FPS average, with a minimum of 57 FPS and a maximum of 77 FPS, offering a stable experience with some headroom. Low settings at 1440p are the strongest, reaching an average of 94 FPS, which provides a comfortable margin for high refresh rate displays.

At 1920x1080 (1080p), the combo shows its full potential. The Ultra preset achieves an average of 68 FPS, making it fully playable at the highest visual quality. High settings improve this to 78 FPS, while Medium reaches 88 FPS with a minimum of 75 FPS and a maximum of 101 FPS. Low settings at 1080p top out at 124 FPS, which is more than enough for competitive or high-refresh gameplay. The data shows a consistent progression: as resolution decreases, the average FPS increases across all presets, with the gap between Low and Ultra narrowing at lower resolutions.

CPU and GPU Roles

The scaling between resolutions and presets reveals how the workload shifts between the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050. At 4K, the GPU is clearly the dominant factor. The drop from Low to Ultra settings at 3840x2160 reduces the average FPS from 63 to 35, a decline of 28 FPS. This significant impact from settings changes indicates that the RTX 5050 is heavily taxed by the pixel count and visual effects at 4K, and the CPU has enough headroom to keep up. The data implies that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at this resolution, as even the highest settings produce low frame rates.

At 1440p, the balance shifts slightly. The difference between Low and Ultra presets is 42 FPS (94 down to 52), which still points to the GPU being the main constraint, but the CPU begins to play a more noticeable role. The Medium preset at 1440p holds an average of 67 FPS, and the minimum of 57 FPS suggests that frame pacing is consistent, but not perfect. The Ryzen 5 4600G, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, provides enough processing power to feed the GPU at this resolution, but the performance gap between presets shows that the RTX 5050 is still the limiting factor for high-quality settings.

At 1080p, the dynamic changes further. The ultra preset at 1920x1080 averages 68 FPS, while Low hits 124 FPS, a spread of 56 FPS. This larger range indicates that the CPU is now more involved, as the GPU has less work per frame and the processor must handle the draw calls and physics more efficiently. The Ryzen 5 4600G's performance is adequate for this task, but the data suggests that at lower resolutions, the CPU can become a more significant contributor to overall frame rates, especially when paired with a capable GPU like the RTX 5050. The recorded metrics show that this combo is well-balanced for 1080p, with neither component consistently holding the other back.

Best Settings per Resolution

Based on the measured FPS, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS varies by resolution. At 3840x2160, the only playable option is Low settings, which achieves an average of 63 FPS. This is a clear indicator that 4K gaming with this hardware requires significant compromises in visual quality to maintain smooth performance. The data shows no other 4K preset reaching the 60 FPS threshold, so Low is the definitive choice for this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the best playable preset is Medium, which delivers an average of 67 FPS. This strikes a balance between visual fidelity and performance, as High settings fall just short at 59 FPS and Ultra is further behind at 52 FPS. The Medium preset's minimum of 57 FPS is close to the threshold, but the average remains above it, making it a reliable option for 1440p gaming. The recorded data suggests that players can enjoy a good mix of graphics quality and responsiveness at this setting.

For 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the most demanding option that still clears 60 FPS, with an average of 68 FPS. This means gamers can run Control at maximum settings on 1080p without sacrificing playability. High and Medium presets also exceed the threshold, offering averages of 78 FPS and 88 FPS respectively, but Ultra provides the full experience. The data indicates that this resolution is where the combo shines, allowing for the highest visual quality while maintaining a smooth frame rate.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo of the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 ranks 2296 out of 3720 tested combinations in the database for Control. This places it in the middle of the pack, indicating that while it is not a top-tier performer, it is far from the bottom. The percentile data for the individual components provides context: the CPU has a percentile of 71 against all CPUs, meaning it outperforms a majority of processors in general benchmarks, while the GPU has a percentile of 66 against all GPUs. This suggests that the pair is well-matched, with neither component being a weak link relative to the other.

The ranking implies that many other combinations deliver higher frame rates in Control, likely due to more powerful CPUs or GPUs. However, the measured FPS at 1080p shows that this combo can still achieve playable performance at the highest settings, which is a positive sign for its overall capability. The data indicates that the combo's mid-pack rank is consistent with its performance profile: it handles mainstream resolutions well but falls behind at higher demands like 4K Ultra. For users with a 1080p or 1440p monitor, this ranking is more than adequate, but those seeking 4K performance would need to look at higher-tier hardware.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the CPU and GPU provide insight into what other hardware would behave similarly in this system. For the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G, the closest matches include the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE, which has an average benchmark score of 17482, just 0.1 percent lower than the Ryzen 5's score. The Intel Core 7 150U scores 17395, a 0.6 percent difference, while the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE and Intel Core i3-14100T are slightly ahead, with scores of 17614 and 17648, representing negative delta percentages of 0.6 and 0.8 respectively. These CPUs would likely produce similar frame rates in Control, as their overall processing power is nearly equivalent.

On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL, which averages 21153 in benchmarks, a 0.6 percent difference. The AMD Radeon HD 8970M and NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile score 21237 and 21379, with deltas of 1 and 1.6 percent, while the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT is slightly lower at 20713, a 1.6 percent difference. These GPUs would offer comparable performance in Control at the same settings, meaning users with any of these cards could expect similar FPS results. The data suggests that swapping the Ryzen 5 4600G or RTX 5050 for one of these rivals would not drastically change the gaming experience.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Control at 4K with playable frame rates?

A: Yes, but only at Low settings, which achieve an average of 63 FPS at 3840x2160. Higher settings at 4K fall below the 60 FPS threshold, with Medium at 45 FPS, High at 40 FPS, and Ultra at 35 FPS.

Q: What is the best setting for 1440p gaming?

A: Medium settings at 2560x1440 deliver an average of 67 FPS, with a minimum of 57 FPS and a maximum of 77 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that stays above 60 FPS, as High averages 59 FPS and Ultra drops to 52 FPS.

Q: Does the combo achieve 60 FPS at 1080p on Ultra?

A: Yes, the Ultra preset at 1920x1080 records an average of 68 FPS. All other presets at this resolution also exceed 60 FPS, with High at 78 FPS, Medium at 88 FPS, and Low at 124 FPS.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested systems?

A: It ranks 2296 out of 3720 tested combinations for Control, placing it in the middle of the database. The CPU scores in the 71st percentile and the GPU in the 66th percentile against their respective categories.

Q: Which components are most similar in performance?

A: For the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE is nearly identical with a 0.1 percent score difference. For the GPU, the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL is the closest at 0.6 percent, while the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT is 1.6 percent lower in benchmark scores.

Q: Is the 4K performance stable or are there frame drops?

A: At 4K Medium settings, the minimum FPS is 38 and the maximum is 52, showing a 14 FPS variance. The Low preset at 4K does not have recorded min/max values, but its average of 63 FPS suggests a smoother experience overall.

The Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 can run Control, but the experience depends heavily on the target resolution. At 1920x1080, the combo clears 60 FPS on all presets, including Ultra with an average of 68 FPS, making it fully capable of handling the game at maximum settings. For 2560x1440, the system achieves playable frame rates on Low and Medium, with Medium delivering 67 FPS as the best high-quality option; High settings fall just short at 59 FPS, so users must choose between a small settings reduction or accepting a marginal frame rate dip. At 3840x2160, only Low settings reach 63 FPS, meaning 4K gaming requires significant visual compromises. The data shows this is a solid choice for 1080p and a good option for 1440p, but not a 4K-capable configuration for this title.