Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Archeage
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 25 | 34 | 54 | 57 |
| 1440p QHD | 41 | 61 | 90 | 106 |
| 1080p Full HD | 61 | 95 | 134 | 154 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Archeage on Your System
The Intel Core i7-14700F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 produces a clear, tiered performance profile in Archeage, where 1080p and 1440p gaming are viable but 4K Ultra is not. The measured data, drawn from direct benchmarking, shows a steady progression of frame rates that scale predictably with resolution and settings, making it possible to identify exact thresholds for smooth gameplay.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 3840x2160, the combo struggles to maintain fluid motion, with the average frame rate falling below the 60 FPS playable threshold across all tested presets. The lowest recorded average is 24.9 FPS at Ultra settings, which is the most demanding configuration tested. Dropping to High settings improves the average to 33.6 FPS, while Medium yields 53.7 FPS. The best result at this resolution comes from Low settings, which reaches 56.6 FPS — still short of the 60 FPS target. The data shows a steep penalty for moving from Low to Ultra, a difference of 31.7 FPS, indicating that the GPU is the limiting factor at 4K.
Moving to 2560x1440, the picture becomes more favorable. The Ultra preset averages 40.7 FPS, which is unplayable by the 60 FPS standard. High settings, however, cross the line at 60.8 FPS, making it the first playable configuration at this resolution. Medium settings provide a comfortable margin at 89.5 FPS, and Low settings reach 106.1 FPS. The jump from Ultra to High represents a 20.1 FPS improvement, suggesting that the most demanding options impose a heavy load that the RTX 4060 cannot overcome at 1440p, but the mid-range presets offer substantial headroom.
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its strongest results. The Ultra preset averages 61 FPS, just barely clearing the playable threshold. High settings produce 95 FPS, Medium reaches 133.8 FPS, and Low tops out at 153.8 FPS. The scaling from Ultra to Low is dramatic — a 92.8 FPS spread — which highlights how much performance is available when the visual load is reduced. The data shows that even the most demanding setting at 1080p is playable, though with a slim margin, while lower settings provide the kind of high refresh rate output that benefits fast-paced MMO combat.
Best Settings per Resolution
For each resolution, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is identified from the measured data. At 3840x2160, no preset meets the 60 FPS threshold, so the answer is none — the highest average achievable is 56.6 FPS on Low settings, which falls short. At 2560x1440, the High preset qualifies, delivering an average of 60.8 FPS. This is the highest visual quality that maintains playable frame rates at this resolution. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset qualifies, averaging 61 FPS. This is the maximum quality setting tested, and it clears the threshold with a margin of just 1 FPS, making it the best choice for users who prioritize visuals over frame rate headroom.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Archeage at 4K Ultra settings?
A: No. The average frame rate at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 24.9 FPS, which is far below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Even Low settings at 4K only reach 56.6 FPS, so no preset provides smooth gameplay at this resolution.
Q: What is the highest playable setting at 1440p?
A: High settings, which average 60.8 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that clears the 60 FPS line at 2560x1440. Medium and Low settings are also playable, offering 89.5 FPS and 106.1 FPS respectively, but Ultra is not, at 40.7 FPS.
Q: Is the Ultra preset at 1080p worth using?
A: It averages 61 FPS, which is just above the playable threshold. The data shows it is technically playable, but the margin is slim. Users seeking stability may prefer High settings at 95 FPS, which offers more headroom for demanding scenes.
Q: How much faster is Low compared to Ultra at 1080p?
A: Low settings average 153.8 FPS, which is 92.8 FPS higher than the Ultra preset’s 61 FPS average. This represents a performance gain of roughly 2.5 times when dropping from maximum to minimum quality.
Q: At which resolution does the system first fail to hit 60 FPS?
A: At 3840x2160, the system fails to hit 60 FPS on every preset. The closest result is Low settings at 56.6 FPS, so even the least demanding configuration at 4K is below the playable threshold.
Q: Does the system have any single preset that is unplayable at 1080p?
A: No. All four presets at 1920x1080 — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — average above 60 FPS. The lowest result is Ultra at 61 FPS, which still clears the threshold.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The nearest rivals for the Intel Core i7-14700F provide context for its CPU performance. The Intel Xeon 6505P has an average score of 53701, which is 0.2% lower than the i7-14700F’s average of 53620. The Intel Xeon Phi 7290 scores 53469, a 0.3% deficit. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X scores 53288, trailing by 0.6%, and the AMD EPYC 7313P scores 53206, a 0.8% gap. These figures indicate that the i7-14700F sits at the top of this group, with its closest competitor being the Xeon 6505P, which is virtually identical in performance. For gaming, any of these CPUs would deliver similar frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, though the i7-14700F holds a slight edge.
On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 has an average benchmark score of 17639. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon HD 7790, scores 17666, which is 0.2% higher. The AMD Radeon 780M scores 17588, a 0.3% deficit, while the AMD Radeon Pro 560 scores 17551, trailing by 0.5%. The AMD Radeon Pro 460 scores 17509, a 0.7% gap. These deltaPct values are all within 1% of the RTX 4060, meaning that in practical terms, these GPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates in Archeage. The HD 7790 is the only rival that slightly outperforms the RTX 4060 in synthetic benchmarks, but the difference is negligible in real-world gaming.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark data reveals how the CPU and GPU divide responsibilities across resolutions. At 3840x2160, the frame rates are consistently low, ranging from 24.9 FPS at Ultra to 56.6 FPS at Low. The relatively small gap between Low and Medium (2.9 FPS) suggests that the GPU is saturated at this resolution, meaning the RTX 4060 is the primary constraint. The CPU, with its high multi-core score of 35122 in Cinebench R23, is unlikely to be the bottleneck when the GPU is struggling to render frames.
At 2560x1440, the scaling between presets becomes more pronounced. The jump from Low (106.1 FPS) to Medium (89.5 FPS) is a 16.6 FPS drop, and from Medium to High (60.8 FPS) is a 28.7 FPS drop. This pattern indicates that the GPU is still the dominant factor, as each increase in visual quality costs a significant number of frames. The CPU’s role is less critical here, though its single-core performance of 4958 in Cinebench R23 helps maintain high frame rates in less demanding scenes.
At 1920x1080, the story shifts slightly. The Ultra preset averages 61 FPS, while High jumps to 95 FPS, a 34 FPS difference. This large gap between the two highest presets suggests that the GPU is heavily taxed by Ultra settings. However, the fact that Low settings reach 153.8 FPS indicates that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU with enough data to achieve very high frame rates. In this region, the i7-14700F’s strong multi-threaded performance, reflected in its 41317 Passmark multithread score, ensures that MMO-related CPU workloads, such as player counts and server interactions, do not become a limiting factor.
The data shows that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at all resolutions, with the CPU providing sufficient headroom at lower settings. As resolution decreases, the CPU’s ability to push high frame rates becomes more apparent, but the GPU’s performance characteristics still dictate the overall playability.
The Verdict
This PC can run Archeage at 1080p and 1440p, but not at 4K. At 1920x1080, the system clears the 60 FPS threshold on all four presets, with Ultra averaging 61 FPS, High at 95 FPS, Medium at 133.8 FPS, and Low at 153.8 FPS. The best settings for this resolution are Ultra, as it is the most demanding preset that stays above 60 FPS. At 2560x1440, the system is playable on High, Medium, and Low presets, with High averaging 60.8 FPS, Medium at 89.5 FPS, and Low at 106.1 FPS. The best settings here are also High, which is the most demanding playable option. At 3840x2160, no preset reaches 60 FPS, with Low being the closest at 56.6 FPS. Therefore, the verdict is that the system is fully playable at 1080p and 1440p, but users must avoid 4K for smooth gameplay.
How This Combo Ranks
In the database of tested combinations, this specific pairing of the Intel Core i7-14700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 ranks 2048 out of 3708 total combos for Archeage. This places it in the lower-middle portion of the overall distribution, meaning that while it is far from the top performers, it is also not among the weakest systems tested. The rank reflects the GPU’s mid-tier status, as the RTX 4060 sits in the 61st percentile among all GPUs, while the CPU is in the 91st percentile among all CPUs. The combination’s overall rank suggests that for this MMO, the GPU holds the system back from higher placements, as the CPU’s strong performance cannot compensate for the GPU’s limitations at higher resolutions. Users with this combo should expect a capable 1080p experience, a decent 1440p experience with adjusted settings, and a poor 4K experience.