Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Archeage
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 21 | 29 | 41 | 48 |
| 1440p QHD | 36 | 52 | 74 | 85 |
| 1080p Full HD | 52 | 76 | 109 | 127 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Archeage on Your System
The Intel Core i5-14600KF paired with the Intel Arc B580 presents a mixed picture for Archeage, a 2014 MMORPG. The data reveals a system that is highly capable at mainstream resolutions but falls short of demanding 4K playability. At 1920x1080, the combination delivers strong performance across most presets, while 2560x1440 offers a solid balance of visual fidelity and smoothness. However, the step up to 3840x2160 exposes the GPU's limits, with even medium settings failing to maintain a consistent 60 FPS. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS data, component roles, and optimal settings for each resolution.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of performance across three resolutions and four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the highest average FPS recorded is 126.8 on Low settings, with Medium achieving 109, High reaching 76, and Ultra dropping to 51.5. This shows a steep curve where the jump from High to Ultra costs roughly 24.5 FPS, a significant 32% reduction. The system comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold on Low, Medium, and High, but falls below it on Ultra. The data indicates that 1080p Ultra is the only preset at this resolution that fails to clear the playable bar.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance scales down predictably. Low settings yield an average of 84.6 FPS, Medium drops to 74, High falls to 52, and Ultra plummets to 36. The pattern mirrors 1080p but with lower absolute numbers. The system maintains 60+ FPS only on Low and Medium presets. The transition from Medium to High represents a 22 FPS loss, highlighting a substantial performance cliff between these two settings. At 1440p, the playable settings are clearly defined: Low and Medium pass, while High and Ultra fail.
At 3840x2160, the results are uniformly below the playable threshold. Low settings average 47.7 FPS, Medium drops to 41.4, High falls to 28.6, and Ultra bottoms out at 20.7. No preset at 4K achieves the 60 FPS target. The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a steady decline, with the gap between Low and High being roughly 19 FPS. The data suggests that this combination is not suited for 4K gaming in Archeage, as even the lowest settings produce a sub-60 FPS experience, and the highest settings result in a slideshow-like frame rate.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark results indicate a clear shift in component bottleneck depending on resolution and preset. At 1920x1080, the Intel Arc B580 appears to be the primary constraint, as evidenced by the dramatic FPS drop when moving from High (76 FPS) to Ultra (51.5 FPS). This 32% performance penalty suggests the GPU is saturated at Ultra settings, unable to keep up with the increased shading and texture demands. The Intel Core i5-14600KF, with its high multi-core performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32544), likely has ample headroom at this resolution, as MMORPGs like Archeage often rely on single-thread performance, where the CPU scores 4594 in Cinebench R23 single-core.
At 2560x1440, the balance shifts further toward the GPU. The FPS reduction from 1080p is significant: High drops from 76 to 52, a 31.6% decrease, while Medium falls from 109 to 74, a 32.1% reduction. These proportional drops indicate that the GPU is the limiting factor, as the increased pixel count directly impacts fill rate and memory bandwidth. The Arc B580’s 456.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 213.6 GPixel/s pixel rate are being taxed more heavily at this resolution. The CPU’s role diminishes, as the frame rate scales almost linearly with resolution, a hallmark of GPU-bound scenarios.
At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes overwhelmingly dominant. The FPS numbers are uniformly low, ranging from 20.7 to 47.7, with the gap between Low and Medium being just 6.3 FPS. This narrow spread suggests that even at Low settings, the GPU is struggling to process the 8.3 million pixels per frame. The CPU’s performance is largely irrelevant here, as the Arc B580’s 13.67 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is insufficient for the workload. The data shows that the GPU’s memory bus width of 192-bit and 12 GB of GDDR6 memory are not enough to sustain playable frame rates at this resolution, regardless of CPU capability.
Best Settings per Resolution
For each resolution, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is as follows. At 1920x1080, the best settings are High, which achieves an average of 76 FPS. This preset provides a substantial visual upgrade over Medium (109 FPS) while still maintaining a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold. The data indicates that Ultra (51.5 FPS) is not viable, leaving High as the optimal choice for 1080p gaming.
At 2560x1440, the best settings are Medium, with an average of 74 FPS. Low settings (84.6 FPS) offer slightly higher performance, but Medium provides better visual quality while still clearing the playable bar. High (52 FPS) and Ultra (36 FPS) are both below the threshold, making Medium the sweet spot for 1440p. The 74 FPS average leaves a buffer of 14 FPS, which is reasonable for a game with potential frame-time spikes during large-scale battles.
At 3840x2160, there are no playable settings, as all presets fall below 60 FPS. The highest average FPS is 47.7 on Low, which is still 12.3 FPS short of the target. The verdict data confirms this, listing zero playable settings for 4K. Users seeking 4K performance would need to consider a more powerful GPU, as the Arc B580’s architecture is not capable of handling this resolution in Archeage.
FAQ
Q: Can the Intel Core i5-14600KF and Intel Arc B580 run Archeage at 1920x1080?
A: Yes, the combination can run the game at 1080p with playable frame rates. The measured data shows 76 FPS on High settings, 109 FPS on Medium, and 126.8 FPS on Low. Ultra settings fall short at 51.5 FPS, so High is the recommended preset.
Q: What is the best resolution and settings combination for this hardware?
A: The best balance of visual quality and performance is 2560x1440 on Medium settings, which achieves 74 FPS. At 1920x1080, High settings are also viable at 76 FPS, offering a higher frame rate but at a lower resolution.
Q: Is 4K gaming possible with this CPU and GPU combo?
A: No, the data shows that 3840x2160 is not playable at any setting. The highest average FPS is 47.7 on Low, and Ultra drops to 20.7 FPS. All presets fall below the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: How does the Intel Arc B580 compare to its nearest rivals in terms of average benchmark score?
A: The Arc B580 has an average benchmark score of 23021. It is 0.2% below the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP (23061), 0.6% above the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (22895), and 0.7% below the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (23172). These are minor differences, indicating similar overall performance.
Q: What is the CPU’s performance percentile relative to all tested CPUs?
A: The Intel Core i5-14600KF ranks in the 90th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 49394. It is 0.3% above the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 (49228) and 0.8% above the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 (48995), showing it is a high-performing processor.
Q: What are the playable settings at 2560x1440?
A: Low and Medium settings are playable at this resolution, with average FPS of 84.6 and 74, respectively. High (52 FPS) and Ultra (36 FPS) are below the 60 FPS threshold.
The Verdict
The data shows that this PC can run Archeage, but with significant caveats based on resolution. At 1920x1080, the system clears the 60 FPS threshold on High, Medium, and Low presets, making it fully capable of smooth gameplay. The average FPS of 76 on High indicates a comfortable experience for most players. At 2560x1440, the system remains playable on Medium (74 FPS) and Low (84.6 FPS), but High and Ultra fall below the threshold. This makes 1440p a viable option for users willing to accept medium visual quality. At 3840x2160, the system fails to achieve playable frame rates on any preset, with the best case being 47.7 FPS on Low. The verdict is clear: this combo is a solid 1080p performer, a decent 1440p option with reduced settings, and unsuitable for 4K gaming.
How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core i5-14600KF and Intel Arc B580 combination ranks 2789 out of 3708 tested combos in Archeage. This places it in the lower-middle portion of the performance spectrum, despite the individual components having strong benchmark scores. The CPU ranks in the 90th percentile among all CPUs, and the GPU ranks in the 68th percentile among all GPUs. The low combo rank suggests that the pair is not well-optimized for this specific game, likely due to the GPU’s limitations at higher resolutions. For context, the combo rank indicates that roughly 75% of tested configurations outperform this one, which is consistent with the GPU’s mid-tier standing. The data implies that users with higher-tier GPUs would see significantly better results, particularly at 1440p and 4K.
Similar Performance Alternatives
For the CPU, the nearest rivals are all within 1% of the i5-14600KF’s average benchmark score of 49394. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 (49228, 0.3% higher) and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (49196, 0.4% higher) would offer nearly identical CPU-bound performance. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 (48995, 0.8% higher) is also a close match. These CPUs would behave similarly in Archeage, where the workload is likely more GPU-dependent at higher resolutions.
For the GPU, the Intel Arc B580’s average score of 23021 is closely matched by several alternatives. The AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP (23061, 0.2% higher) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (22895, 0.6% lower) are near-perfect matches. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (23172, 0.7% higher) is slightly faster, while the NVIDIA P106-100 (23249, 1% higher) is also similar. Users with any of these GPUs would see comparable frame rates in Archeage, though the RTX 3080 might offer slightly better performance at 4K due to its higher score. The data suggests that swapping the CPU or GPU for these alternatives would result in minimal performance changes, as the deltaPct values are all under 1%.