Archeage

The Intel Core i5-12400 paired with the Intel Arc B390 presents a specific performance profile for Archeage, a 2014 MMORPG. The recorded data shows that this combination is heavily constrained by the graphics processor, limiting playability to lower resolutions and settings. This analysis breaks down the measured frame rates, compares the hardware to its nearest rivals, and determines the optimal configurations based on the database's playable threshold of 60 frames per second.

Best Settings per Resolution

Based entirely on the measured FPS data, the most demanding preset that maintains an average of at least 60 FPS at each resolution is as follows:

• 3840x2160 (4K): No settings are playable. The highest average frame rate recorded at this resolution is 28 FPS on Low settings, which falls significantly short of the 60 FPS threshold.
• 2560x1440 (1440p): No settings are playable. The best result is 48 FPS average on Low settings, which is still below the target.
• 1920x1080 (1080p): Medium settings is the most demanding preset that remains playable, achieving an average of 64 FPS. Low settings also clear the threshold with an average of 71 FPS.

The vernacular of the data is clear: 1080p is the only resolution where this combo can offer a smooth experience, and it must be limited to Medium or Low presets.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Archeage at 4K resolution?

A: No. The database shows no playable settings at 3840x2160. The highest average frame rate recorded at this resolution is 28 FPS on Low settings, which is well below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best playable setting at 1920x1080?

A: The best playable setting is Medium, which achieves an average of 64 FPS. This preset clears the 60 FPS threshold while offering a higher visual quality than the Low preset, which averages 71 FPS.

Q: How does the Arc B390's performance compare to the CPU's performance in this game?

A: The data suggests the GPU is the primary bottleneck. While the CPU's benchmark scores are strong (e.g., a Passmark single-thread score of 3456), the GPU's average benchmark score is very low (1482) and sits in the 9th percentile of all GPUs. This low GPU performance is reflected in the frame rates, which fail to reach 60 FPS at 1440p and above.

Q: What is the frame rate on High settings at 2560x1440?

A: The measured average frame rate is 29 FPS. This is not a playable experience according to the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: Is the Intel Core i5-12400 a good match for the Intel Arc B390?

A: According to the benchmark data, the CPU is far more capable than the GPU. The CPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 and Intel Core i3-14100F, showing it has similar compute power. However, the GPU's nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX and GT 710, which are very low-end parts. This imbalance indicates the GPU will limit performance in most gaming scenarios.

Q: What is the average frame rate on Ultra settings at 1920x1080?

A: The average frame rate is 29 FPS. This is identical to the High preset at 2560x1440, suggesting that the GPU is overwhelmed by the demands of the Ultra preset.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following data is the complete set of measured frame rates from the database. Values are presented as Average (Minimum, Maximum) where available.

3840x2160:

• Low: 28 FPS
• Medium: 25 FPS (21, 28)
• High: 17 FPS
• Ultra: 11 FPS

2560x1440:

• Low: 48 FPS
• Medium: 43 FPS (36, 49)
• High: 29 FPS
• Ultra: 20 FPS

1920x1080:

• Low: 71 FPS
• Medium: 64 FPS (54, 73)
• High: 43 FPS
• Ultra: 29 FPS

The data shows a clear pattern. At any given resolution, the frame rate drops by roughly 20 FPS when moving from Low to High settings, and then drops a further 14 FPS when moving from High to Ultra. The step from Low to Medium is much smaller, often around 5-8 FPS, suggesting that the Medium preset is a point of diminishing returns for GPU load.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The database provides nearest rivals for both components to contextualize their performance.

For the CPU (Intel Core i5-12400):

The average benchmark score is 18683, placing it in the 72nd percentile of all CPUs. Its closest rivals, based on average score, are:

• AMD EPYC 7643 (avg score 18697, 0.1% slower)
• Intel Core i7-1355U (avg score 18730, 0.3% slower)
• AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 (avg score 18811, 0.7% slower)
• Intel Core i3-14100F (avg score 18519, 0.9% faster)

Any of these CPUs would provide essentially the same level of processor performance in Archeage. The differences in score are negligible, so swapping the i5-12400 for one of these rivals would have little to no effect on the measured frame rates, as the GPU remains the limiting factor.

For the GPU (Intel Arc B390):

The average benchmark score is 1482, which is in the 9th percentile of all GPUs. Its closest rivals are much older, lower-end parts:

• NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX (avg score 1463, 1.3% faster)
• NVIDIA GeForce 800M (avg score 1460, 1.5% faster)
• NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM (avg score 1446, 2.5% faster)
• NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 (avg score 1443, 2.7% faster)

The performance deltas are small, meaning any of these GPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates. A system with a GT 710, for example, would likely perform within a few percentage points of the Arc B390 in this game, reinforcing the conclusion that the graphics card is the definitive bottleneck in this pairing.

The Verdict

The verdict from the database is clear: this PC can run Archeage, but only at 1080p with the right settings. The `verdictByResolution` field confirms that at 3840x2160 and 2560x1440, there are no playable settings. The system fails to reach the 60 FPS threshold at these resolutions. The experience is limited to 1920x1080, where the Low and Medium presets are playable. The best playable setting is Medium, which yields an average of 64 FPS. While the Low preset offers a higher average frame rate of 71 FPS, the Medium preset is the most demanding that still clears the playable threshold, providing a better visual experience without sacrificing smoothness.

How This Combo Ranks

Among all combinations of CPUs and GPUs tested in the database, this specific pairing ranks 3297 out of 3708. This places it in the bottom 11% of all tested combos for Archeage. This low ranking is directly attributable to the Intel Arc B390's performance. The CPU is in the top 28% of all processors, but the GPU's 9th percentile ranking drags the entire system down. The data indicates that the system's overall capability is severely hampered by the graphics solution.

CPU and GPU Roles

The recorded measurements clearly delineate the roles of the processor and graphics card in Archeage.

• Resolution Scaling: As resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440, the average frame rate on High settings drops from 43 FPS to 29 FPS. Moving to 3840x2160 results in a further drop to 17 FPS. This significant frame rate loss with increasing pixel count is a classic sign of a GPU bottleneck. The CPU load does not scale with resolution in the same way, but the GPU's workload increases substantially.

• Settings Scaling: The impact of graphical settings is equally telling. At 1920x1080, the frame rate falls from 43 FPS on High to 29 FPS on Ultra. This 14 FPS drop for a single step in preset quality again points to the GPU's limited processing power. The CPU is capable of handling the extra draw calls and physics calculations, but the GPU cannot render the additional visual effects fast enough.

• Component Imbalance: The CPU's 3DMark scores (e.g., 5873 for 16 threads, 910 for single thread) are respectable for a modern desktop chip. In contrast, the GPU's sole 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1482. This massive disparity in compute capability means that for this game, the GPU is the sole determinant of performance. Even at 1080p Low settings, where the CPU's role is more prominent, the frame rate of 71 FPS is likely limited by the GPU's ability to issue draw calls. The data suggests that upgrading the GPU would yield a dramatic performance increase, while upgrading the CPU would provide no measurable benefit for Archeage.