Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Archeage
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 17 | 26 | 38 | 42 |
| 1440p QHD | 31 | 45 | 66 | 74 |
| 1080p Full HD | 45 | 66 | 98 | 110 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Archeage on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and Intel Arc B570 combination presents a curious case for Archeage, a 2014 MMORPG that remains surprisingly demanding at higher settings. The data reveals a system that is decisively capable at mainstream resolutions but falls short of the 60 FPS playability threshold at 4K across all tested presets. This analysis breaks down the measured performance, contextualizes it against similar hardware, and offers clear guidance on how to best configure this pairing for the game.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Based on aggregate benchmark scores, the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F sits in a tightly contested performance band. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core i5-14600T, which scores a nearly identical 32,707 average points, a mere 0.1% difference from the 7400F’s 32,750. The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is equally close at 32,697 points, showing a 0.2% edge for the AMD chip. Interestingly, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H is the only nearby competitor that scores slightly higher, at 32,812 points, which translates to a -0.2% delta for the 7400F. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 trails by 0.3%, with 32,662 points. The practical takeaway is that in CPU-bound scenarios, this processor will perform within a hair’s breadth of these four alternatives, making any of them a viable substitute if availability or platform preferences differ.
On the graphics side, the Intel Arc B570’s average benchmark score of 20,556 places it in a similar cluster of near-identical performers. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is the closest rival, posting 20,534 points, just 0.1% behind the Intel card. The Intel Arc A750 is the direct comparison within Intel’s own lineup, scoring 20,582 points, which is 0.1% ahead of the B570. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M and AMD Radeon R9 M390X are also within the same performance envelope, with deltas of 0.4% and -0.5% respectively. For Archeage, these results suggest that swapping the Arc B570 for any of these four GPUs would yield nearly indistinguishable frame rates, assuming the CPU remains constant. The data indicates that the gaming experience is defined more by the combination’s overall balance than by any single component’s dominance.
CPU and GPU Roles
The measured FPS data for Archeage shows a clear trend: the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck as resolution increases, while the CPU’s role is more pronounced at lower resolutions where frame rates are higher. At 1920x1080, the system achieves 110 FPS on Low settings and 98 FPS on Medium, indicating that both components are working efficiently but the headroom suggests the CPU is keeping pace with the GPU’s output. When resolution scales to 2560x1440, frame rates drop proportionally more than the pixel count increase would suggest, pointing to the GPU starting to struggle. The Low preset falls to 74 FPS, a 33% reduction from 1080p, while Medium drops to 66 FPS. This scaling pattern implies that the Arc B570’s memory bandwidth and compute resources are being taxed more heavily.
At 3840x2160, the GPU’s limitation becomes stark. Even the Low preset only manages 42 FPS, and the High preset collapses to 26 FPS. The CPU’s performance, as indicated by its strong multi-core scores (21,765 in Cinebench R23), is unlikely to be the limiting factor here; the sheer pixel throughput required at 4K overwhelms the GPU. The data shows that the gap between Low and Medium settings is relatively small at 4K (42 vs 38 FPS), suggesting that the GPU is hitting a hard performance ceiling rather than being constrained by specific settings. Conversely, at 1080p, the jump from High (66 FPS) to Ultra (45 FPS) is dramatic, which indicates that the Ultra preset introduces effects that heavily tax the GPU, but the CPU still has enough headroom to feed frames. The verdict is that for this game, the Intel Arc B570 dictates playability at 1440p and above, while the Ryzen 5 7400F is more than sufficient to avoid bottlenecking at 1080p.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The benchmark data provides a complete picture of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the system delivers its strongest results. The Low preset averages 110 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS playability threshold. Medium settings see a slight dip to 98 FPS, with a minimum of 83 FPS and a maximum of 112 FPS, showing consistent frame pacing. High settings average 66 FPS, still comfortably playable, but Ultra drops sharply to 45 FPS, which fails to maintain smooth gameplay. The 1080p data suggests that the sweet spot is between Medium and High, with both offering a solid experience.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance scales down noticeably. The Low preset averages 74 FPS, which remains playable, and Medium follows at 66 FPS, with a recorded minimum of 56 FPS and maximum of 76 FPS. This minimum dip below 60 FPS is worth noting, as it could cause occasional stutter in crowded MMORPG scenes. High settings average 45 FPS, which is below the playable threshold, and Ultra falls to 31 FPS. At 1440p, the system is effectively limited to Low and Medium presets for a consistent experience.
At 3840x2160, the data paints a grim picture for high-resolution enthusiasts. Every preset fails to reach 60 FPS. Low settings average 42 FPS, Medium drops to 38 FPS with a minimum of 32 FPS and maximum of 43 FPS, High falls to 26 FPS, and Ultra is nearly unplayable at 17 FPS. The frame rates at 4K indicate that this combination is not suitable for this game at that resolution, regardless of graphical compromises. The data shows a clear linear decline from 1080p to 4K, with the GPU being the sole limiting factor.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Archeage at 60 FPS in 1080p?
A: Yes, the data shows that at 1920x1080, the Low, Medium, and High presets all average above 60 FPS, with 110, 98, and 66 FPS respectively. Only the Ultra preset falls short at 45 FPS.
Q: What is the best graphics preset for 1440p to maintain 60 FPS?
A: The Medium preset is the highest setting that achieves an average of 66 FPS at 2560x1440. The High preset drops to 45 FPS, so it is not recommended for a smooth experience.
Q: Is 4K gaming possible with the Intel Arc B570 in Archeage?
A: No, the benchmark results indicate that no preset at 3840x2160 reaches the 60 FPS playable threshold. The highest average FPS is 42 on Low settings, which is still below the target.
Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7400F compare to the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The Ryzen 5 7400F scores 32,750 points on average, which is 0.2% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H’s score of 32,697. This difference is negligible in real-world gaming performance.
Q: What are the minimum and maximum FPS recorded for the Medium preset at 1080p?
A: At 1920x1080 with Medium settings, the minimum FPS is 83 and the maximum is 112, with an average of 98 FPS. This indicates a relatively stable frame rate.
Q: Which component is more important for this game at 4K?
A: The GPU is clearly the limiting factor. The CPU’s performance is sufficient, as evidenced by the strong frame rates at 1080p, but the Arc B570 cannot handle the pixel throughput required at 3840x2160.
The Verdict
This PC can run Archeage successfully at 1080p and 1440p, but with significant caveats. At 1920x1080, the system clears the 60 FPS threshold on High settings, averaging 66 FPS, and offers even higher headroom on Medium (98 FPS) and Low (110 FPS). This makes 1080p the most comfortable resolution for this combination, with the ability to enjoy high visual fidelity without sacrificing smoothness. At 2560x1440, the system remains playable but only on Low and Medium presets, with Medium averaging 66 FPS. The minimum FPS of 56 on Medium is a slight concern, but the average stays above the playable mark. The Ultra preset is not viable at any resolution, as it fails to reach 60 FPS even at 1080p.
For 3840x2160, the verdict is clear: the system cannot run the game at a playable frame rate. All presets fall below 60 FPS, with the best case being 42 FPS on Low. The data suggests that 4K is not an option for this hardware in Archeage. The overall assessment is that this is a solid 1080p and entry-level 1440p machine for this title, but users seeking 4K performance would need to look at a more powerful GPU.
Best Settings per Resolution
- 1920x1080: The best preset that maintains an average of at least 60 FPS is High, which delivers 66 FPS. While Medium offers 98 FPS, High provides a better visual experience while still comfortably clearing the playability threshold.
- 2560x1440: The most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Medium, averaging 66 FPS. Low is also playable at 74 FPS, but Medium offers a better balance of quality and performance.
- 3840x2160: No preset achieves 60 FPS. The best average is 42 FPS on Low, which is below the playable threshold. For this resolution, the system is not recommended for this game.
How This Combo Ranks
In the broader context of all tested hardware combinations for Archeage, this pairing of the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and Intel Arc B570 ranks 2983rd out of 3708 total combinations. This places it in the lower half of all systems tested, which is consistent with the performance data showing that it struggles at higher resolutions. The rank reflects that while the CPU is above average (83rd percentile among all CPUs), the GPU’s 65th percentile standing drags the overall combo down when paired with a demanding title like Archeage at high settings. The data implies that most other tested systems offer better 4K or Ultra-preset performance, but this combo remains a viable option for 1080p gamers who prioritize a strong CPU for other tasks. The rank is a sobering reminder that raw component scores do not always translate to top-tier gaming performance in every title.